Skip to main content

‘We Were the System’: Practitioners’ Experiences and the Juvenile Justice Mosaic in the 1980s

  • Chapter
The Management of Change in Criminal Justice
  • 283 Accesses

Abstract

During the 1980s, the significant use of institutionalisation for juveniles common in the 1970s was radically reversed. Between 1980 and 1990, the number of both male and female juveniles sentenced to custody fell dramatically, from 7000 to 1400. In the same period, the proportionate use of non-custodial options increased and also the overall number of juveniles dealt with by the youth justice system was reduced by 37%. A strategy of ‘diversion’ (from custody, from prosecution and from the youth justice system altogether) was evident (Telford and Santatzoglou, 2012). A significant policy event of the time was the Conservative government’s 1983 Intermediate Treatment (IT) Initiative, which offered significant resources to voluntary organisations, working in partnership with local authorities, in return for providing alternative-to-custody, community-based projects for juvenile offenders. Notably, youth justice practitioners were seen as instrumental in the occurrence of the diversionary transition. As one practitioner has put it: ‘what happened [during the 1980s] was very special; the input from practitioners’ (Lorna Whyte in Rutherford, 1992, p. 26). Indeed, accounts written in the early 1990s strongly associate the custodial decline with practice activity in shaping innovative community programmes (Allen, 1991, p. 49; Ball, 1992, p. 280; Pitts, 1992, p. 136; Gelsthorpe and Morris, 1994, p. 983).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AJJUST, The Journal of the Association for Juvenile Justice (January 1987), in Verdict Section of Letters, No. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • AJJUST, The Journal of the Association for Juvenile Justice (June 1987) ‘Workshops for AJJ Conference’, No. 13, pp. 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • AJJUST, The Journal of the Association for Juvenile Justice (September 1987) ‘Conference Feedback — The facts and figures’, No. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • AJJUST, The Journal of the Association for Juvenile Justice (December 1987) ‘A Case for Change on Roles within the Appeal Process’, in Rough Justice Section of Letters, No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • AJJUST, The Journal of the Association for Juvenile Justice (May, 1989) Evaluating the DHSS IT Initiative: A Practical View — The Implications for Young Adult Offenders No. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • AJJUST, The Journal of the Association for Juvenile Justice (October 1989) The Letters Section, No. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. (1989) ‘From juveniles to young adults: Time for change?’, AJJUST, 20(May), pp. 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. (1991) ‘Out of jail: The reduction in the use of penal custody for male juveniles 1981–88’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, pp. 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. (1978) Representation in the Juvenile Court (Routledge & Kegan Paul. London: Henley and Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C. (1992) ‘Young offenders and the youth court’, The Criminal Law Review, pp. 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dor, O. (2007), Thinking About Law: In Silence with Heidegger (US and Canada: Hart Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1987) ‘Intermediate treatment: A realistic alternative to custody’, CRIMINAL JUSTICE – The Magazine of the Howard League, November, 5(4), pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Y. (1988) ‘Information received by the court’, in NACRO Report of a NACRO Working Party: School Reports in the Juvenile Court — a Second Look.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. and Gosling, F. (1985) ‘Developing a local strategy’, Initiatives – Newsletter of the NACRO Juvenile Offenders Team, Winter, No. 5, pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, M. and Wiggin, P. (1985) ‘Partners in crime – How agencies can work together’, INITIATIVES — Newsletter of the NACRO Juvenile Offenders Team, Summer, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and Morris, A. (1994) ‘Juvenile justice 1945–1992’, in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 949–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, F. and Locke, T. (1990) ‘Developing an Initiative’; in Reducing Custody for Juveniles: The DHSS Intermediate Treatment Initiative – Report of the Department of Health and Social Security’s Conference held on 3 February 1989, NACRO-Juvenile Crime Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. (1989) ‘A patchwork quilt’, in Sheena Doyle (ed.), Towards a Custody Free Community – A Collection of Papers From Two AJJ National Conferences (Association for Juvenile Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, S. and Miller, D. (1989) ‘Alternatives to custody: Establishing services access criteria & minimum professional standards’, AJJUST, 20 (May), pp. 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (1984) ‘Starting new projects takes time’, INITIATIVES – Newsletter of the NACRO Juvenile Offenders Team, Summer, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1989) ‘The successful revolution’, Community Care (INSIDE), March 30, pp. i–ii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.W. (1985) ‘The need for credibility’, INITIATIVES – Newsletter of the NACRO Juvenile Offenders Team, Winter, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiliko, J., Atandi, B. and Awino, Z. (2012), ‘Strategic planning in turbulent environment: A conceptual view’, DBA Africa Management Review, 3(1), pp. 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, K. (1991) ‘Partnership in a local juvenile justice system: The case for marginality’, in R. Reiner and M. Cross (eds.), Beyond Law and Order-Criminal Justice Politics and Policy into the 1990s (London: Macmillan Academic and Professional), 186–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, S. and Treitel, P. (1983) Juvenile Justice in the United Kingdom: Comparisons and Suggestions for Change (London: New Approaches to Juvenile Crime).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, H. (1990) ‘Power and ideology in the juvenile court’, AJJUST, 24 (June), pp. 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhillips, S. (1984) ‘Monitoring a community alternatives scheme’, INITIATIVES – Newsletter of the NACRO Juvenile Offenders Team, Autumn, No. 2, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978) ‘Patterns in strategy formation’, Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1987) ‘Crafting strategy’, Harvard Business Review (July–August), pp. 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO) (1982) Community Alternatives for Young Offenders, Final Report, NACRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO) (1985) Project Development Survey-DHSS Initiative, NACRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO) (1990) Reducing Custody for Juveniles: The DHSS Intermediate Treatment Initiative, Report of the Department of Health and Social Security’s Conference held on 3 February 1989, NACRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO) (1991) Seizing the Initiative: NACRO’s Final Report on the DHSS Intermediate Treatment Initiative to Divert Juvenile Offenders from Care and Custody, 1983–1989, NACRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, H., Casburn, M. and Turnbull, D. (1981) Receiving Juvenile Justice (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. (1992) ‘The end of an era’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, pp. 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A. (1987) ‘Editorial’, CRIMINAL JUSTICE — The Magazine of the Howard League, 5(4), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A. (1989) ‘The mood and temper of penal policy. Curious happenings in England during the 1980s’, Youth and Policy, 27, pp. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A. (1992) Growing Out of Crime — The New Era (Winchester: Waterside Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., Schatzman, L., Bucker, R., Ehrlich, D. and Sabshin, M. (1964) Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions (New York: Free Press of Glencoe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford, M. and Santatzoglou, S. (2012) ‘“It was about trust” — practitioners as policy makers and the improvement of inter-professional communication within the 1980s youth justice process’, Legal Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford, M. and Santatzoglou, S. (2013) ‘“No More Excuses”: the shaping of community interventions in England and Wales in the 1980s’, Int. J. Public Law and Policy, 3(4), 416–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. (1989) ‘Four years of pace’, AJJUST, October, No. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. (1996) The Development of the Juvenile Justice Service in Hampshire (1987 to 1991), The Effect on the Criminal Justice Process, and the Implications for Establishing Radical Practice in Statutory Organisations (MPhil, Faculty of Law, University of Southampton), Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Sotirios Santatzoglou

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santatzoglou, S. (2015). ‘We Were the System’: Practitioners’ Experiences and the Juvenile Justice Mosaic in the 1980s. In: Wasik, M., Santatzoglou, S. (eds) The Management of Change in Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462497_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics