Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the Marketisation of the Probation Service Through an Interpretative Policy Framework

  • Chapter
The Management of Change in Criminal Justice

Abstract

The government’s plan for the management of offenders, Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) (Ministry of Justice, 2013a) outlines a structure where only those assessed as high risk are managed in the public sector and sets out a process for bidding to provide criminal justice services within a market environment. This agenda builds on the intentions set out in Breaking the Cycle (Ministry of Justice, 2010) to extend the principles of payment by results (PbR) to all providers of services for offenders. In the TR agenda, the government is moving from a position of relative stability in an area not recently attracting significant public concern towards a policy that has little evidence base. It is a policy decision fraught with pitfalls that could expose the government to a high-profile policy failure especially if previously effective systems are dismantled and reoffending increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Audit Commission (2012) Local Payment by Results Briefing: Payment by Results for local services, http://archive.audit-commission.gov.uk/auditcommission/sitecollectiondocuments/Downloads/20120405localPbR.pdf, last accessed 7 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (2002) ‘Constructing the sociology of social problems: Spector and Kitsuse twenty-five years later’, Sociological Forum, 17(4), pp. 699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, P. and Donoghue, J. (2013) ‘Digging up the grassroots? The impact of marketisation and managerialism on local justice’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2013) Everything for Sale? The Marketisation of UK Higher Education (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2011) ‘Where to now?’, Probation Journal, 58(3), pp. 211–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, S. and Goodman, A. (2013) ‘Transforming rehabilitation, a fiscal motivated approach to offender management’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCRM (2010) Coordinated Community Response Model Online Toolkit, http://www.ccrm.org.uk/, last accessed 30 January 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. (2013) ‘Practice values versus contract values: The importance of a culture of reflective practice’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluley, E. (2010) ‘Serious Further Offence: The case of Dano Sonnex’, Probation Journal, 57(1), pp. 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M. (2011) ‘Bringing the penal voluntary sector to market’, Criminal Justice Matters, 77(1), pp. 32–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corston, J. (2007) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System (London: Home Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coy, M. and Kelly, L. (2011) Islands in the Stream: An Evaluation Of Four London Independent Domestic Violence Advocacy Schemes The Henry Smith Charity, http://www.henrysmithcharity.org.uk/documents/IslandsintheStreamexecutivesummary2011.pdf, last accessed 9 January 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C., Griffith, S., Groves, N., Johnson, H. and Douglass, J. (2010) Evaluation of Early Intervention Models for Change in Domestic Violence: Northern Rock Foundation Domestic Abuse Intervention Project, 2004–2009, http://www.nr-foundation.org.uk/downloads/DAI-full-evaluation-report.pdf, last accessed 27 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, D. (1998) ‘Toughing it out: From labour opposition to labour government’, Policy Studies, 19(3–4), pp. 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S. and Maruna, S. (2004) ‘Desistance-focused criminal justice policy research: Introduction to a special issue on desistance from crime and public policy’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), pp. 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and Hedderman, C. (2012) ‘Providing for women offenders: The risks of adopting a payment by results approach’, Probation Journal, 59(4), pp. 374–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, B. (2013) ‘Public protection? The implications of grayling’s “Transforming Rehabilitation” agenda on the safety of women and children’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomm, R. (2013) ‘What will “Count” and be transformed for women in the criminal justice system?’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayling (2014) Comment: The ban on sending prisoner books is part of my rehabilitation revolution, http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2014/03/24/comment-the-ban-on-sending-prisoners-books-is-part-of-my-reh, last accessed 2 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardian (2009) ‘No quick fix for probation’s problems’, http://www.theguardian.com/society/joepublic/2009/jun/24/probation-system-failures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, C. (2013) ‘Transforming rehabilitation and the creeping marketisation of British public services’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2010) ‘Government policy on women offenders: Labour’s legacy and the coalition’s challenge’, Punishment and Society, 12(4), pp. 485–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2013) ‘Payment by results: Hopes, fears and evidence’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heins, E. (2013) ‘Doctors in the driving seat? Reforms in NHS primary care and commissioning’, pp. 47–65 in G. Ramia, K. Farnsworth and Z. Irving (eds.), Social Policy Review 25: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy (Bristol: Policy Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HMIP (2005) Inquiry into the Supervision of Peter Williams by Nottingham City Youth Offending Team HM Inspectorate of Probation: London, http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/probation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/03/peterwilliamsenquiry-rps.pdf, last accessed 27 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIP (2006a) An Independent Review of a Serious Further Offence case: Damien Hanson and Elliot White HM Inspectorate of Probation: London, http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/probation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/03/hansonandwhitereview-rps.pdf, last accessed 6 August 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIP (2006b) An Independent Review of a Serious Further Offence case: Anthony Rice HM Inspectorate of Probation: London, http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/probation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/03/anthonyricereport-rps.pdf, last accessed 27 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, H. and Godfrey, B. (2013) ‘Counterblast: The perennial problem of short prison sentences’, The Howards Journal, 52(4), pp. 433–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (2002) ‘Policy convergence and crime control in the USA and the UK: Streams of influence and levels of impact’, Criminal Justice, 2(2), pp. 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (USA: Harper Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S. and Bushway, S. (2008) ‘“The Chicken and Egg” of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime’, European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), pp. 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. (2012) ‘Big Society, the Voluntary Sector and the Marketisation of Criminal Justice’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12(5), pp. 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2013) ‘Transforming rehabilitation: Evidence, values and ideology’, British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2–3), pp. 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F., Farrall, S., Lightowler, C. and Maruna, S. (2013) ‘Discovering desistance: Reconfiguring criminal justice?’, Scottish Justice Matters, 1(2), pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2010) Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders (London: Ministry of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013a) Transforming Rehabilitation: A Strategy for Reform (London: Ministry of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013b) Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin: July 2010 to June 2011 (London: England and Wales Ministry of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013c) Rehabilitation Programme: Payment Mechanism Straw Man Procurement document available, http://www.justicegov.uk/downloads/rehab-prog/payment-mechanism.pdf, last accessed 1 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, A. (2012) ‘Counterblast: Putting a price on rehabilitation: Payment by results and the March of the market in prisons and probation’, The Howard Journal, 51(4), pp. 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omand, D. (2013) A Serious Further Offence Review Regarding the Supervision of Jon Venables, http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/corporate-reports/moj/2010/omand-review, last accessed 1 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, H. (1964) ‘Two models of the criminal process’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), pp. 1–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. (1995) ‘The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2) pp. 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (2006) ‘Reducing repeat victimisation among high-risk victims of domestic violence: The benefits of a coordinated community response in Cardiff, Wales’, Violence Against Women, 12(8), pp. 761–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (2009) Independent Domestic Violence Advisors: A Process Evaluation (Cardiff University: Cardiff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. and Laub, J. (1995) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life (Harvard: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. and Radaelli, C. (2004) ‘Policy change and discourse in Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues’, West European Politics, 7(2), pp. 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. and Kitsuse, M. (1987) Constructing Social Problems (New York: Aldine de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Third Sector (2012) Analysis: Payment by Results – Can it Work for Charities? http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/Finance/article/1156811/analysis-payment-results-work-charities/, last accessed 7 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyer, R. (1992) ‘Some consequences of contextual constructionism’, Social Problems, 39(1), pp. 35–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, N. (2006) ‘How should we theorise public policy? Problem solving and problematicity’, Policy and Society, 2, pp. 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, N. (2013) ‘The questioning theory of policy practice: Outline of an integrated analytical framework’, Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), pp. 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, D. (2009) ‘On the social construction of social problems and social problems theory: A contribution to the legacy of John Kitsuse’, American Sociologist, 40, pp. 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Women in Prison (2012) Corston Report: 5 Years on, http://www.womeninprison.org.uk/userfiles/file/Corston+5%20Report.pdf, last accessed 1 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (2007) ‘Interpretation in policy analysis: On methods and practice’, Critical Policy Studies, 1(1), pp. 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rose Broad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Keele University, UK

    Martin Wasik (Emeritus Professor of Law) & Sotirios Santatzoglou (Emeritus Professor of Law) (Emeritus Professor of Law) &  (Emeritus Professor of Law)

Copyright information

© 2015 Rose Broad and Jon Spencer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broad, R., Spencer, J. (2015). Understanding the Marketisation of the Probation Service Through an Interpretative Policy Framework. In: Wasik, M., Santatzoglou, S. (eds) The Management of Change in Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462497_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation