Skip to main content

Managing Magistrates’ Courts: A Loss of Local Control

  • Chapter
The Management of Change in Criminal Justice
  • 294 Accesses

Abstract

The tension between local and central services has played out in government over the last century. Ministers and their London-based civil servants are keen to gain and maintain control over policy and how it is implemented. Local politicians and other stakeholders say central control does not work and stifles innovation. There are many areas of justice which have see-sawed between local and central control, of which the administration of the courts is a good example. This chapter offers an overview of how and why the administration of magistrates’ courts in England and Wales was centralised in 2003, and what implications that has had for local and other stakeholders.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auld, R. (2001) Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales (London: Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Constitutional Affairs (2005) Courts Boards Guidance (London: CM6461).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, J. (2014) ‘Reforming the role of magistrates: Implications for summary justice in England and Wales’, Modern Law Review, 77(6), pp. 928–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gloucestershire Magistrates’ Courts Committee (2003) Annual Report 2002/3, http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Governance Working Group (2013) Judicial Governance in the Magistrates’ Courts: Final report, http://magistrates-association.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/judicial-governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (2013) Autumn 2013 Survey Report (REF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2002) Justice for All (London: CM5563).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2015) 2010 to 2015 Government Policy: Crime Prevention, www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-crime-prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Committee on the Lord Chancellor’s Department Courts Bill First Report of Session 2002–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial Office (2012) Policy Changes Affecting Family Panel Magistrates and Magistrates’ Involvement with Community Safety Partnerships JO Circular AC (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Vay, J. (1989) Report of the Le Vay Efficiency Scrutiny of Magistrates’ Courts (London: Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2011) Response to Consultation on Reforms Proposed in the Public Bodies Bill Reforming the Public Bodies Landscape (15 December 2011) Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2014) User Guide to Neighbourhood Justice Panels MoJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotland, Baroness (2003) ‘Narrowing the justice gap’, Justice of the Peace, 167, pp. 865–866.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Penelope Gibbs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibbs, P. (2015). Managing Magistrates’ Courts: A Loss of Local Control. In: Wasik, M., Santatzoglou, S. (eds) The Management of Change in Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462497_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics