Skip to main content

Collaborative Performance-Making in Context

  • Chapter
Collaboration in Performance Practice

Abstract

‘Collaboration in the arts’, according to historian Charles Green (2001: x), became ‘a crucial element in the transition from modernist to postmodernist art’ and it continues to be a key component of creative processes in Western arts contexts. Although performative art forms can be seen to have an inherent collaborative aspect, it is only recently that an emphasis has been placed on problematizing processes of co-labouring in the disciplines of the performing arts. The recognition and exploration of creativity as ‘social’ and frequently ‘an explicitly collaborative endeavour’ has opened new avenues for research across diverse disciplines in the early twenty-first century (Littleton and Miell, 2004: 1). With specific reference to the performing arts, Kathryn Syssoyeva (2013: 2) similarly suggests that scholarly interest in ‘collective creation’ has only recently gathered pace. This collection of writing contributes to this growing area of scholarly interest in its examination of the role and place of collaboration in contemporary performance-making. Critically evaluating issues around the politics and ethics of collaborative work, it foregrounds the notion of creativity in performance as ‘social’, presenting an analysis of both the social and cultural conditions and the artistic processes that shape contemporary collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Austin, J.H. (2003) Chase, Chance, and Creativity: The Lucky Art of Novelty. (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banes, S. (1983) Democracy’s Body: Judson Dance Theater, 1962–1964. (Ann Arbor Michigan: University of Michigan Research Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille, G. (2004), The Unfinished System on Nonknowledge, in Kendall, S. (ed). (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Translated by M. Ritter. (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt R. (2006) Judson Dance Theater: Performative Traces. (Abingdon and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvejić, B. (2005) Collectivity? You mean Collaboration?, URL: http://eipcp.net/transversal/1204/cvejic/en [Accessed December 2014]

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Z. and Steinbock, A. (2011) ‘Max Scheler’ in E. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/scheler/ [Accessed December 2014]

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Filewod, A. (2008) ‘Collective Creation: Process, Politics and Poetics’, in Barton, B. (ed.) Collective Creation, Collaboration and Devising. (Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garafola, L. (1998) Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes. (New York: Da Capro Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. (2001) The Third Hand: Collaboration in Art from Conceptualism to Postmodernism. (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropius, W. (2011) ‘The Theory and Organization of the Bauhaus’, in Harrison, C. and Wood, P. Art in Theory 1900–2000: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, K. (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. 1st edn. Published in 1927 (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B. (2007) ‘The revenge of the concept: Artistic exchanges, networked resistance’, in Bradley, W. & Esche, C. (eds) Art and Social Change. (London: Tate Publishing & Afterall), 350–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. and Kunst, B. (2012) ‘Introduction: Labour and Performance’, Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 17:6, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, B. (2012) ‘Art and Labour: On consumption, laziness and less work’, Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 17:6, 116–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laermans, R. (2012) ‘“Being in common”: Theorizing artistic collaboration’, Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 17:6, 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. (2009) Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy. (Cambridge Massachusetts and London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. and Massumi, B. (2014) Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melrose, S. (2005) ‘“Out of Words”’. Presented as a keynote address at the Centre for the History and Analysis of Recorded Music (CHARM) Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melrose, S. (2006) ‘“Constitutive Ambiguities”: Writing Professional or Expert Performance Practices, and the Théâtre du Soleil’ in Kelleher, J. and Ridout, N. (eds), Contemporary Theatre in Europe: A Critical Companion. (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 120–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melrose, S. (2009a) ‘Signs of Life, Signs of the Times: and if all artists are semioticians?’, ADSA Conference Keynote, Boom or Bust: Economies of Production and Exchange in Theatre, Performance and Culture, Edith Cowan University, Curtin University and Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia, URL: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/3068/1/presentationADSA2009.pdf [Accessed December 2014]

  • Melrose, S.(2009b) ‘Expert-intuitive processing and the logics of production: struggles in (the wording of) creative decision-making in dance’, in Butterworth, J. and Wildschut, L. (eds) Contemporary Choreography: A Critical Reader. (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J. (2000) Being Singular Plural. (California: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noys, B. (2000), George Bataille: A Critical Introduction. (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, R. and Werry, M. (2012) ‘On Failure (On Pedagogy): Editorial Introduction’, Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 17:1, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, W. (1690), Political Arithmetick, URL:http://www.marxists.org/reference/ subject/economics/petty/index.htm [Accessed November 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2011), The Total Work of Art in European Modernism. (Ithaca: Cornwell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, B. (2008) Becoming Beside Ourselves: The Alphabet, Ghosts, and Distributed Human Being. (Durham and London: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sachsenmaier, S. (2013) ‘Beyond Allan Kaprow: An Interview with Rosemary Butcher’, Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 4: 2, 267–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, M. (2011) ‘Collective Responsibility’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2011 Edition, URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collective-responsibility [accessed December 2014].

  • Schechner, R. (1981) ‘Fall of the American Avant-Garde’, Performing Art Journal 5: 2, 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. (2006) ‘The Darker Side of the Multitude’, Theory Kit, URL: http://kit.kein.org/node/1 [Accessed January 2015].

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (2004) Visions of Belonging: Family Stories, Popular Culture and Postwar Democracy. (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (ed.), (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Syssoyeva, K. and Proudfit, S. (eds), (2013), A History of Collective Creation. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, G. (1994) Heuretics: The Logic of Invention. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. (1999), ‘Introduction: A grain of sand in the works: continuity and change at the Théâtre du Soleil’ in Williams, D. (ed.) Collaborative Theatre: The Théâtre du Soleil Sourcebook (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Noyale Colin and Stefanie Sachsenmaier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colin, N., Sachsenmaier, S. (2016). Collaborative Performance-Making in Context. In: Colin, N., Sachsenmaier, S. (eds) Collaboration in Performance Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462466_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics