Skip to main content

English in Japan: Indecisions, Inequalities, and Practices of Relocalization

  • Chapter
Unequal Englishes

Abstract

This chapter threads together the socio-historical and structural inequalities and contradictions inherent in the meanings, practices, realizations, and appropriations of English in Japan, a language (as will be seen) that the Japanese are not entirely comfortable with for historical and ideological reasons. I will argue that various realizations, enactments, vacillations, and indecisions concerning English and Englishes in Japan can be traced to Japanese conceptualizations of socio-cultural space in turn closely tied in to a political economy and cultural politics that can be traced back, at least, to the traumas of Japan’s post-war occupation by English-speaking Allied powers led by the forces of the United States. Put simply, the matter of unequal Englishes in Japan defies simple explanations and needs to be understood alongside intricacies to be found in both politics and history. In the course of my discussion, I will address the following issues and how they are linked to the matter of unequal Englishes: (1) the question of whether there is a variety of English which can be called ‘Japanese English’; (2) factors that influence the positioning of a Japanese English vis-à-vis essentialist views of American English as well as formalized and regulatory practices regarding English language education in the country. This chapter concludes that structural and ideological inequalities, inhibitions, prohibitions, and prejudices linked to the presence and treatment of English in Japan are not easily surmountable and are therefore unlikely to go away any time soon.

Languages are no more pregiven entities that pre-exist our linguistic performances … Rather they are sedimented products of repeated acts of identity.

(Pennycook 2007, p. 73)

[T]he … sedimentation of English subsystems is a result of agentive acts, particular moves to identify, to use and adapt available semiotic resources for a variety of goals. English, like any other language, does not exist as a prior system but is produced and sedimented through acts of identity.

(Pennycook 2007, p. 73)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Befu, H 2001, Hegemony of homogeneity, Transpacific, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S 2005, ‘Reconstructing local knowledge, reconfiguring language studies’, in S Canagarajah (ed), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice, Routledge, New York & London, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, M & Sugita, Y 2007, ‘Introduction: the US occupation of Japan—innovation, continuity and compromise’, in M Caprio & Y Sugita (eds), Democracy in occupied Japan: the US occupation and Japanese politics and society, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dower, J 1999, Embracing defeat: Japan in the wake of World War II, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P 1985, The politics of education: culture, power and liberation, Bergin and Harvey, Westport.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P 2000, Pedagogy of the oppressed, 30th anniversary edition, trans MB Ramos, Continuum, New York & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, P 2012, The making of monolingual Japan: language, ideology and Japanese modernity, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hino, N 2009, The teaching of English as an international language in Japan, AILA Review, vol. 22, pp. 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honna, N 2008, English as multicultural language in Asian contexts: issues and ideas, Kuroshio, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honna, N & Takeshita, Y 1998, ‘On Japan’s propensity for native speaker English: a change in sight’, Asian Englishes, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C 1995, ‘The 1955 system and the American connection: a bibliographic introduction’, Japan Policy Research Institute (JPRI) Working Paper 11, viewed on 5 June 2013, <http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/ wp11.html>.

  • Kachru, BB 1995, ‘The speaking tree: a medium of plural canons’, in M Tickoo (ed), Language and culture in multilingual societies, SEAMEO RELC, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, R 2002, ‘The impact of globalisation on language teaching in Japan’, in D Block & D Cameron (eds), Globalisation and language teaching, Routledge, London & New York, pp. 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, R 2011a, ‘Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan’, Linguistics and Education, vol. 22, pp. 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, R 2011b, ‘The politics of school curriculum and assessment in Japan’, in Y Zhao, J Lei, G Li, M He, K Okano, D Gamage, H Ramanathan, & N Magahed (eds), Handbook of Asian education: a cultural perspective, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 214–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, AMY 2012, ‘Towards transformation of knowledge and subjectivity in curriculum inquiry: insights from Chen Kuan-Hsing’s “Asia as Method”’, Curriculum Inquiry vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, J 2005, ‘Metroethnicity language and the principle of the Cool’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, vol. 175/176, pp. 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, B 2002a, ‘Aisatsu: ritualized politeness as sociopolitical and economic management in Japan’, in RT Donahue (ed), Exploring Japaneseness: on Japanese enactments of culture and consciousness, Ablex, Westport, Connecticut and London, pp. 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, B 2002b, Japanese higher education as myth, ME Sharpe, Armonk, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, B 2006, The state bearing gifts: deception and disaffection in Japanese higher education, Lexington Books, Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphey T 2004, ‘Participation, (dis-)identification, and Japanese university entrance exams’, TESOL Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A 2007, Global Englishes and transcultural flows, Routledge, London & New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A 2010, Language as a local practice, Routledge, London & New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, DJ 2010, ‘Ideologies of internationalization and the treatment of diversity within Japanese higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M 1995, ‘America’s favorite war criminal: Kishi Nobusuke and the transformation of U.S.-Japan relations’, Japan Policy Research Institute Working (JPRI) Paper 11, viewed on 5 June 2013, <http://www.jpri.org/publications/ workingpapers/wp11.html>.

  • Seargeant, P 2009, The idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the evolution of a global language, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, Buffalo & Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanlaw, J 2004, Japanese English: language and culture contact, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A & Miyahara, M 2011, ‘Parallel universe: globalization and identity in English language teaching at a Japanese university’, in P Seargeant (ed), English in Japan in the era of globalization, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 60–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh, G 2012, ‘Having English as a resource for multicultural understanding: exploring possibilities in Japanese ELT’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh, G 2013, ‘Scrutinizing the native speaker as referent, entity and project’, in SA Houghton & DJ Rivers (eds), Native-speakerism in foreign language education: intergroup dynamics in Japan, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp. 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, T 1994, ‘CIA spent millions to support Japanese right in 50’s and 60’s’, New York Times, October 9, 1994, accessed on 9 June 2013, <http://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/09/world/cia-spent-millions-to-support-japanese-right-in-50-s-and-60-s.html>.

  • Yamagami, M & Tollefson, J 2011, ‘Elite discourses and globalization in Japan: the role of English’, in P Seargeant (ed), English in Japan in the era of globalization, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano, Y 2011, ‘English as an international language and Japanese English’, in P Seargeant (ed), English in Japan in the era of globalization, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ruanni Tupas

Copyright information

© 2015 Glenn Toh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Toh, G. (2015). English in Japan: Indecisions, Inequalities, and Practices of Relocalization. In: Tupas, R. (eds) Unequal Englishes. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461223_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics