Skip to main content

The Emergence of Architecture-Transformations: an Examination of Architecture Experiences from the Perspective of the Sociology of Space and Actor-Network-Theor

  • Chapter
Architecture, Materiality and Society
  • 720 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with the problem of how one can do research into and describe the power of architecture that unfurls notably in architectonic experiences. It thus addresses the problem of aesthetics, which has attracted little attention from a sociological point of view (Reckwitz 2008:259–80). Since the same holds true for architectonic experiences (Dangschat 2009), the present chapter takes a fundamental look at the correlations related to the act of experiencing architecture and its effectiveness. The notion of the effectiveness and power of architecture refers foremost to Foucault’s ([1975] 1994) understanding of power, in which he basically distinguishes two modes. He identifies how a specific function of a certain territory leads to in-respective exclusions of certain groups of people (Foucault [1975] 1994:148), and further he underlines how architecture is used as a tool to transform individuals, as he demonstrates in relation to the architecture of prisons (Foucault [1975] 1994:222). In contrast to that of Foucault, who focused less on the observers’ perspectives,1 my approach implies, in relation to architectonic experiences, that one has to examine the perspective of those who experience architecture in order to indicate how that architecture unfurls its power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Akrich, Madeleine. 1987. “Comment décrire les objets techniques”. Technique et Cultur 9:49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asbrand, Barbara. 2010. “Wissen und Handeln in der Weltgesellschaft.” Pp. 75–92 in Das Gruppendiskussionsverfahren in der Forschungspraxis, edited by R. Bohnsack. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, Ralf, ed. [2003] 2006. Hauptbegriffe Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich/UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, Ralf. [1991] 2008. Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in qualitative Methoden. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich/UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power”. Sociological Theory 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. [1922] 2009. “Die Begriffsform im mythischen Denken (1922).” Pp. 3–61 in Schriften zur Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Philosophische Bibliothek, edited by M. Lauschke. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangschat, Jens D. 2009. “Symbolische Macht und Habitus des Ortes.” Pp. 311–42 in Die Architektur der Gesellschaft — Theorien für die Architektursoziologie, edited by J. Fischer and H. Delitz. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. [1975] 1994. Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fränkel, Hermann. 1969. Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums. Eine Geschichte der griechischen Epik, Lyrik und Prosa bis zur Mitte des fünften Jahrhunderts. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jim. 1988. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: the Sociology of a Door-Closer.” Social Problems 35(3):298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jim. 2006. “Die Vermischung von Menschen und Nicht-Menschen.” Pp. 237–58 in ANThology. Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie, edited by A. Belliger and D. J. Krieger. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreckel, Reinhard. 1976. Soziologisches Denken. Eine Kritische Einführung. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landesschulrat für Vorarlberg. 2007. “Landeslehrplan für Berufsschulen. Lehrberuf: TISCHLEREI.” Retrieved 6 March 2014 (http://www.scool4u.info/lehrberufe/tischlerin/tischlerin.php).

  • Latour, Bruno. 1999. “A Collective of Humans and Nonhumans.” Pp. 174–215 in Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network- Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löw, Martina. 2001. Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löw, Martina. 2009. “Materialität und Bild. Die ‘Architektur der Gesellschaft’ aus strukturierungstheoretischer Perspektive.” Pp. 343–64 in Die Architektur der Gesellschaft. Theorien für die Architektursoziologie, edited by J. Fischer and H. Delitz. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przyborski, Aglaja. 2004. Gesprächsanalyse und dokumentarische Methode. Qualitative Auswertung von Gesprächen, Gruppendiskussionen und anderen Diskursen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, Andreas. 2008. Unscharfe Grenzen. Perspektiven der Kultursoziologie. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, Theodore R. 1997. “Practices and Actions. A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences (27):283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, Theodore R. [1996] 2008. Social Practices: a Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, Hermann. 2003. Was ist Neue Phänomenologie? Rostock: Ingo Koch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, Hermann. 2007. Der unerschöpfliche Gegenstand. Grundzüge der Philosophie. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strum, Shirley S., and Bruno Latour. 1987. “Redefining the Social Link: From Baboons to Humans.” Social Science Information 26(4):783–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaneva, Albena. 2012. “Grenzüberschreitungen. Das Soziale greifbar machen: Auf dem Weg zu einer Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie des Designs.” Pp. 71–90 in Das Design der Gesellschaft zur Kultursoziologie des Designs, Sozialtheorie, edited by S. Moebius and S. Prinz. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Theresia Leuenberger

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leuenberger, T. (2015). The Emergence of Architecture-Transformations: an Examination of Architecture Experiences from the Perspective of the Sociology of Space and Actor-Network-Theor. In: Müller, AL., Reichmann, W. (eds) Architecture, Materiality and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461131_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics