Advertisement

Gazprom pp 48-71 | Cite as

Value and Performance: Gazprom from the Corporate Governance and Finance Perspective

Chapter
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

In 2013 PFC Energy pronounced Gazprom the world’s ninth largest oil and gas company, and Gazprom was seventeenth on Forbes magazine’s list of biggest public companies, also ranking second in the list of the biggest oil and gas companies (ranked by production level).1 As of September 2013 its market capitalization was around $108 billion, not only way below that of Exxon Mobil, the long-term industry leader, but also less than that of the likes of BP and Total, after being on par with them just a year before. The 2013 annual Fortune 500 list ranks the company third by profits and twenty-first by revenues. It controls 15% of global gas production and 18% of global reserves, and is one of the major suppliers of energy to Europe.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Minority Shareholder Dividend Yield Optimal Investment Strategy Royal Dutch Shell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atanasov, Vladimir A., Bernard S. Black, and Conrad S. Ciccotello. 2008. “Unbundling and Measuring Tunneling.” Law and Economics Research Paper Paper No. 117. Austin: University of Texas School of Law, January.Google Scholar
  2. Baumol, William J., and Allan S. Blinder. 2011. Economics Principles and Policy. Boston: South Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, Sanford V., and John Tschirhart. 1988. Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Black, Bernard. 2001. “The Corporate Governance Behavior and Market Value of Russian Firms.” Emerging Markets Review 2: 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkart, M., Denis Gromb, and Fausto Panunzi. 1997. “Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (August): 693–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyck, Alexander, Natalya Volchkova, and Luigi Zingales. 2008. “The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia.” Journal of Finance of the American Finance Association 63, no. 3: 1093–135.Google Scholar
  7. Gazrombank, Oil & Gas Weekly (April 11, 2014) retrieved from http://www.gazprombank.ru/upload/iblock/94f/gpb_og_weekly_20140411.pdf
  8. Gompers, P. A., J. L. Ishii, and A. Metrick. 2003. “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 107–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gordon D.V., K. Gunsch, and C.V. Pawluk. 2003. “A Natural Monopoly in Natural Gas Transmission.” Energy Economics 25, no. 5 (September): 473–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan Titman. 1998. Financial Markets and Corporate Strategy. Scarborough, Ont.: Irwin Professional Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, Nandini. 2005. “Partial Privatization and Firm Performance.” Journal of Finance 60, no. 2 (April): 987–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoyos, Carola. 2007. “The New Seven Sisters: Oil and Gas Giants Dwarf Western Rivals.” Financial Times, March 12.Google Scholar
  13. Koppell, Jonathan G. S. 2003. The Politics of Quasi-Government Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mikkelson, Wayne H., and Richard S. Ruback. 1985. “An Empirical Analysis of the Interfirm Equity Investment Process.” Journal of Financial Economics 14: 523–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation. 2010. “Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period up to 2030.” Decree 1715-r of the Russian Federation. Moscow (www.energystrategy.ru/projects/docs/ES-2030_%28Eng%29.pdf).Google Scholar
  16. Mitrova, Tatiana. 2011. “The Domestic Context: Russian Gas Production.” Unpublished paper presented at Chatham House, London, March 28, 2011 (see www.chathamhouse.org/russian-oil-and-gas-new-trends-and-implications/agenda).Google Scholar
  17. Navalny, Alexei, and Vladimir Ashurkov. 2012. “Uncontrolled Public Companies.” Harvard Business Review Russia, April 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. White Paper on Corporate Governance in Russia. Paris: OECD. (www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/2789982.pdf).Google Scholar
  19. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2006. “Economic Survey of the Russian Federation, 2006.” Policy Brief. Paris: OECD, November (www.oecd.org/russia/37656835.pdf).Google Scholar
  20. Puffer, Sheila M., and Daniel J. McCarthy. 2003. “The Emergence of Corporate Governance in Russia.” Journal of World Business 38: 284–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny. 1997. “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance 52, no. 2 (June): 737–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smeenk, T. 2010. “Russian Gas to Europe: Creating Access and Choice. Underpinning Russia’s Exit Strategy with Gazprom’s Infrastructure Investments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/327665017).Google Scholar
  23. Smit, Han T. J., and Lenos Trigeorgis. 2004. Strategic Investment: Real Options and Games. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Morgan Stanley. 2013. “Clouds Lifting—Upgrading to OW.” July 18 (www3.ms.iwealth.thomsonreuters.com/Pages/ResearchReport1.aspx; access by subscription).Google Scholar
  25. Tordo S., Brandon S. Tracy, and Noora Arfaa. 2011. “National Oil Companies and Value Creation.” World Bank Working Paper 218. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsygankova, Marina. 2012. “An Evaluation of Alternative Scenarios for the Gazprom Monopoly of Russian Gas Exports.” Energy Economics 34, no. 1: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Victor, Nadejda. 2008. “Gazprom: Gas Giant Under Strain.” Working Paper No. 71. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, January.Google Scholar
  28. Yang, Tzu-Yi, Yu-Tai Yang, Barry Bishop, and Ming-Chan Shen. 2011. “Russia’s Economic Reform: Insights and Analyses into Gazprom.” OPEC Energy Review 35, no. 2 (June): 140–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Vladimir Kreyndel 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations