Advertisement

Time for Balanced Thinking

Reflections on Dichotomous Multiple Missions of Public Higher Education in the United States
  • Stewart E. Sutin
Chapter
  • 168 Downloads
Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)

Abstract

Public higher education (HE) in the United States has evolved in different ways as societal needs have changed over time. Currently, concerns have arisen regarding affordability, access, accountability, quality of education, cost-effectiveness, campus security, and graduation and job placement of colleges and universities. Public HE functions in a context characterized by economic volatility, intense financial strains faced by most students and parents, a more diverse student population, breakthrough technologies, increasing reliance upon adjunct faculty and online education, and a troubled P-12 public education system that graduates far too many students who are not college ready. Institutions are called upon to operate at lower costs, while restraining tuition pricing and improving quality of education and student support services. At the same time, state funding is unpredictable and has not kept up with growth in enrollment and demands for more and better services. By 2012 state and local government funding of public HE had reached its lowest level in 25 years per full-time-equivalent student (State Higher Education Executive Officers 2013). These realities should cause leaders and faculties to reflect upon discretionary choices that include their institutional missions, research and teaching priorities, core curriculum, and the operating environments that support these missions. The complexity of these problems mandates strategic responses.

Keywords

High Education Community College Institutional Mission American College Test Student Debt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACT. 2012. National Curriculum Survey. Iowa City, IA: ACT. Available online at: http://www.act.org/research-policy/national-curriculum-survey/.Google Scholar
  2. Belkin, D. 2013. “Parents Shell out Less for Kids in College.” Wall Street Journal, July 23. Available online at: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324144304578622343932131354.
  3. Bok, D. 2008. Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bruni, F. 2013. “Frank Bruni’s Blog.” New York Times, April 12.Google Scholar
  5. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2013. “Media Briefing: Examining States’ Dramatic Higher Education Cuts and Tuition Increases.” Press Release, March 19.Google Scholar
  6. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2013. What President’s Think: A 2013 Survey of Four-Year College Presidents. Washington, DC: Pearson. Available online at: http://results.chronicle.com/PresSurveyP1?elid=CLP2013print.Google Scholar
  7. Delta Cost Project. 2011. Trends in College Spending 1999–2009. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
  8. Economist. 2012. “Higher Education—The College-Cost Calamity.” August 4.Google Scholar
  9. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 2013. Student Loan Debt by Age Group. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Available online at: http://www.newyorkfed.org/studentloandebt/index.html.Google Scholar
  10. Gallup. 2013. Gallup-Inside Higher Ed College and University Presidents Panel—2013 Survey 3 Findings. Washington, DC: Gallup. Available online at: http://www.gallup.com/services/176747/gallup-inside-higher-college-university-pres-idents-panel-2013-survey-findings.aspx.Google Scholar
  11. National Association of State Budget Officers. 2013. Fiscal Survey of States, Spring2013. Washington, DC: National Association of State Budget Officers. Available online at: http://www.nasbo.org/publications-data/fiscal-survey-states/fiscal-survey-states-spring-2013.Google Scholar
  12. Pennsylvania Department of Education. 2012. Governor’s Advisory Commission on Postsecondary Education: Report and Recommendations. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Education. Available online at: http://teampa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ACPE-Final-Recommendations-11–14.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. Pew Center on States. 2012. The Widening Gap Update. Report. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts, June 18. Available online at: http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/0001/01/01/the-widening-gap-update.Google Scholar
  14. Rhodes, F. 2001. The Creation of the Future: The Role of the American University. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. State Higher Education Executive Officers. 2013. State Higher Education Finance, FY 12. Boulder, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers, The College Board. Available online at: http://www.sheeo.org/resources/publications/shef-%E2%80%94-state-higher-education-finance-fy12.Google Scholar
  16. US Department of Education. 2006. A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education. A Report of the Commission Appointed by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Available online at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED493504.pdf.Google Scholar
  17. US Government Debt. 2013. “Government Debt in the United States—Debt Clock.” Available online at: http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John N. Hawkins and Ka Ho Mok 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stewart E. Sutin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations