Advertisement

The Shifting Ecology of Research in Asian Pacific Higher Education Imitation or Innovation

  • John N. Hawkins
Chapter
Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)

Abstract

In an earlier essay I referred to research and scholarship as comprising a critical, if not the most critical part, of the “holy trinity” of higher education (HE), alongside teaching and service (Hawkins 2012). This remains true today even as the nature of research changes and what I refer to here as the ecology of research is such that it remains in a state of transformation and shifting alliances. As was noted earlier, the predominant place of research and pervasive expansion of this mission into most levels of HE was not always the case. John Henry Newman’s view in the mid-1800s remains relevant and in some respects is being restated in current critiques of the role of research in HE: “A university … is a place of teaching universal knowledge. This implies that its object is … the diffusion and extension of knowledge rather than its advancement. If its object were scientific and philosophical discovery, I do not see why a university should have students” (1996, 22). The relationship between teaching, learning, research, and service is finding new expression in the Asia Pacific region and the dominant paradigm of continual expansion at all levels is being tempered by the race to establish “research universities,” world-class universities, and higher rankings along with the attendant contradictions and predicaments that this race entails. All of this is linked increasingly to a quest not just for excellence in these areas but also innovation, an opaque if somewhat slippery concept.

Keywords

High Educa Asia Pacific Region Social Science Citation Index Carnegie Foundation Shifting Ecology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G., and J. Balan, eds. 2007. Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America: World Class Worldwide. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bienenstock, A. 2008. “Essential Characteristics of Research Universities.” In Universities as Centers of Research and Knowledge Creation: An Endangered Species?, edited by H. Vessuri and U. Teichler, 33–40. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Birrer, F., and S. Tobias. 2003. “Linking Science and Business: Examples of Educational Innovation.” Paper presented at Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, August 26–29.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: The Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  5. Bush, V. 1945. Science—the Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. Available online at: http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm.Google Scholar
  6. Carnegie Foundation. 2014. “About Carnegie Classification.” Available online at: http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, X. 2006. “Ideal Orientation Policy-Making: Analysis of the 985 Process.” Peking University Education Review 4 (1) January: 28–45.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, C. M., and H. J. Eyring. 2011. The Innovative University. San Francisco: Josey Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Courant, P. N., J. J. Duderstadt, and E. N. Goldenberg. 2010. “Needed: A National Strategy to Preserve Public Research Universities.” Chronicle of Higher Education, January 3.Google Scholar
  10. Deem, R., K. H. Mok, and L. Lucas. 2008. “Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the ‘World Class’ University in Europe and Asia.” Higher Education Policy 21:83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglass, J. A. 2010. “From Chaos to Order and Back.” Center for Studies in Higher Education, Research and Occasional Paper Series 7 (10): 1–20.Google Scholar
  12. Glenny, L. 1959. The Autonomy of Public Colleges: The Challenge of Coordination. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Gulbrandsen, M., and H. Etzkowitz. 1999. “The Convergence between Europe and America: The Transition from Industrial to Innovation Policy.” Journal of Technology Transfer 24:223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hawkins, J. N. 2012. “The Transformation of Research in the Knowledge Society: The U.S. Experience.” In The Emergent Knowledge Society and the Future of Higher Education, edited by D. E. Neubauer, 26–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hayek, F. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4:33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Indiresan, P. V. 2007. “Prospects for World-Class Research Universities in India.” In Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, edited by P. G. Altbach and J. Balan, 95–122. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jayaram, N. 2007. “Beyond Retailing Knowledge.” In Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, edited by P. G. Altbach and J. Balan, 70–95. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, M., and D. Patton. 2009. “Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current Invention Ownership Model.” Research Policy. Available online at: doi: http://hcd.ucdavis.edu/faculty/webpages/kenney/articles_files/09%20research%20policy.pdf.
  19. Kim, K. S. 2007. “The Making of a World-Class University at the Periphery.” In Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, edited by P. G. Altbach and J. Balan, 122–143. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leydesdorff, L., and P. Van den Besselaar, eds. 1994. Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies. London: Pinter. Available online at: www.carnegiefoundation.org.Google Scholar
  21. MEXT. 2007. “World Premier International Research Center (WPI) Initiative.” Available online at: www.mext.go.jp/english/research_promotion/1303822.htm.Google Scholar
  22. Mitsubishi. 2009. Report on the Results of the Questionnaire of WPI Initiative. Tokyo: Mitsubishi Corporation.Google Scholar
  23. Mori, R. 2013. Correspondence with Professor Rie Mori, National Institute for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation.Google Scholar
  24. National Science Board (NSB). 2007. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. National Science Foundation (NSF). 2007. Asia’s Rising Science and Technology Strength: Comparative Indicators for Asia, the European Union and the United States. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.Google Scholar
  26. Newman, J. H. 1996. The Idea of the University. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Reed, K. 1995. “Citation Analysis of Faculty Publication: Beyond Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index.” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 83 (4): 503–508.Google Scholar
  28. Rhoades, G., and S. Slaughter. 2006. “Academic Capitalism in the New Economy: Challenges and Choices.” American Academic. Available online at: http://fir-goa.usc.es/drupal/files/Rhoades.qxp.pdf.
  29. Salmi, J. 2009. The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seong, S., S. Popper, C. Goldman, and D. Evans. 2008. Brain Korea 21, Phase II A New Evaluation Model. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Education.Google Scholar
  31. Shin, J. C. 2009a. “Building World-Class Research University: The Brain Korea 21 Project.” Higher Education 58:669–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. —. 2009b. “Classifying Research Universities in Korea: A Performance Based Approach.” Higher Education 57:247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shinohara, K. 2002. “Toyoma Plan—Center of Excellence Program for the 21st Century.” In National Science Foundation Tokyo Regional Office. Tokyo: Japan.Google Scholar
  34. Simon, D., and C. Cao. 2009. China’s Emerging Technological Edge: Assessing the Role of High-End Talent. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 1996. “The Emergence of a Competitiveness Research and Development Policy Coalition and the Commercialization of Academic Science and Technology.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 21:303–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas, K. 2013. “Scientific Research: How Asia Carved Its Niche.” Guardian, January 17.Google Scholar
  37. Trow, M. 1974. “Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education.” In OECD Policies for Higher Education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Valimaa, J., and D. Hoffman. 2008. “Knowledge Society Discourse and Higher Education.” Higher Education 56:265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Varma, R. 2000. “Changing Research Cultures in US Industry.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 25:395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. —. 2006. Managing Industrial Research Effectively. Hyderabad: ICFAI University Press, 1–202.Google Scholar
  41. Vessuri, H., and U. Teichler, eds. 2008. Universities as Centers of Research and Knowledge Creation: An Endangered Species? Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Vest, C. M. 2007. The American Research University from World War II to World Wide Web. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wheeler, D. 2012. “Asia Will Power Growth in Research and Development This Year.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 4, 2012, 1–3.Google Scholar
  44. World Bank. 2012. Putting Higher Education to Work: Skills and Research for Growth in East Asia. World Bank East Asia and Pacific Regional Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. Zhu, W., and N. C. Liu. 2009. “Research Performance of Chinese Research Universities: A Scientometric Study.” Journal of Higher Education 30 (2): 30–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John N. Hawkins and Ka Ho Mok 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • John N. Hawkins

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations