Abstract
Utopia, the search for the good society, or at least a much improved one; and science, the pursuit of knowledge, both as an end in itself and for the betterment of human life. Surely the two should go together? And so they have done, according to many utopian scholars, from the seventeenth-century scientific revolution onwards. For Gregory Claeys, utopia ‘has come increasingly to rely on science, to the extent that the two are inextricably intertwined and scientific progress has emerged as the quintessential ideology of modernity’.2 M.I. Finley observes that ancient and early modern utopias took scarcity for granted and therefore had to stress ‘simplicity, the curbing of wants, asceticism, and a static society’; but then came ‘the release of new sources of energy and with it a flood of technological Utopian imagination’.3
The end of our foundation is the knowledge of causes, and secret motions of things; and the enlarging of the bounds of human empire, to the effecting of all things possible.
Francis Bacon, The New Atlantis (1627)1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
G. Claeys (2011) Searching for Utopia: The History of an Idea (London: Thames & Hudson), p. 151.
M.I. Finley (1967) ‘Utopianism Ancient and Modern’, in K.H. Wolff and B. Moore, Jr (eds), The Critical Spirit: Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse (Boston, MA: Beacon Press), p. 13.
K. Kumar (1991) Utopianism (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991), pp. 54, 59.
A. Huxley (1971) Brave New World (London: Folio Society), p. 154. Subsequent page references in the text are to this edition.
See E. Hansot (1974) Perfection and Progress: Two Modes of Utopian Thought (Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press), p. 100.
See B. Goodwin and K. Taylor (1982) The Politics of Utopia: A Study in Theory and Practice (London: Hutchinson), p. 63.
L.T. Sargent (2010) Utopianism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 104; Kumar (1991), pp. 11–12.
H.G. Wells (2005) A Modern Utopia, ed. G. Claeys and P. Parrinder (London: Penguin), p. 11.
T.S. Kuhn (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
See e.g. C.H. Waddington (1941) The Scientific Attitude (Harmondsworth: Penguin);
B. Russell (1931) The Scientific Outlook (London: Allen & Unwin).
F. Jameson (2005) Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions (London and New York: Verso, 2005), pp. 10–11, 184.
J.W. von Goethe (1987) Faust: Part One, trans. D. Luke (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).
O. Stapledon (1972) Star Maker (Harmondsworth: Penguin), p. 16.
K.S. Guthke (1990) The Last Frontier: Imagining Other Worlds from the Copernican Revolution to Modern Science Fiction, trans. H. Atkins (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press), p. 353.
J.B.S. Haldane, ‘Auld Hornie, F.R.S.’, Modern Quarterly 4 (Autumn 1946), 32–40.
See e.g. R. Coward (1983) Patriarchal Precedents: Sexuality and Social Relations (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
V. Nabokov (1980) Lectures on Literature, ed. F. Bowers (New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich), p. 280.
J. Raulerson (2013) Singularities: Technoculture, Transhumanism, and Science Fiction in the Twenty-First Century (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press), p. 4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Patrick Parrinder
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parrinder, P. (2015). Introduction. In: Utopian Literature and Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456786_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456786_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58001-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45678-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)