Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Being the Solo Faculty Member of Color

Research Evidence from Field and Laboratory Studies

  • Chapter
The Truly Diverse Faculty

Part of the book series: The Future of Minority Studies ((FMS))

Abstract

In 1988, Duke University had a plan. In a large effort to diversify their faculty, each of their 56 departments was mandated to hire one black faculty member within five years. Five years later, administrators conceded that although 25 new black faculty members had been hired, 18 had left the university. What the administrators may have failed to recognize is that hiring only one person of color per academic department can create demonstrable negative experiences and outcomes directly attributable to the situation of solo status, or being the only member of one’s racial group in the department. In this chapter, I review research addressing the issues faced by junior faculty of color (JFC) who face, as these newly hired black faculty likely faced, being one of few or the only person of color in his or her department. This research provides insight into the heightened visibility experienced by such faculty members and how it influences the career experiences of JFC, and suggests potential strategies for reducing negative outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Council on Education. (2003). Minorities in higher education. Washington DC: Office of Minority Concerns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1990). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 83–103). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V., & Geis, F. L. (1984). Turning lead into gold: Evaluations of men and women leaders and the alchemy of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 811–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. L., & Swim, J. K. (1995). The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 876–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., & McGraw, K. M. (1984). What’s good for the goose is not good for the gander. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, J. R., & Monin, B. (2007). Failure to warn: How student race affects warning of potential academic difficulty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 663–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Flores Niemann, Y., & Snider, K. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus: Stigma and a common group identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Kenny, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1982). Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. New York: Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikes, E. J. (1991). When men are the minority: The case of men in nursing. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M., Block, C., & Lucas, A. (1992). Presumed innocent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, M., & Yoder, J. D. (1999, August). Gender and status characteristics: The effects of status interventions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., Aronson, J., & Good, C. (2006). A particular resiliency to threatening environments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Saaid, A. M., Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Knight, J. L. (2006). What’s in a name? A multiracial investigation of the role of occupational stereotypes in selection decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1145–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K., & Ford, J. K. (1985). A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P. W., & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. G., & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 918–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, D. M., & Goff, P. A. (2005). Clearing the air: The effect of experimenter race on target’s test performance and subjective experience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, D. M., Ko, S. J., & Friedman, R. A. (2009). The “Obama” effect: How a salient role model reduced race-based performance differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 953–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. Z. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. (2004). Faculty diversity: Problems and solutions. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). (2006). Academic Institutions of Minority Faculty with S&E Doctorates: 2003 (NSF Publication 06–318). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Y. F., & Dovidio, J. F. (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Y. F., & Secord, P. F. (1995). Social ecology of stereotyping. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 25, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, E. M. (1989). Effects of male-female ratio at work. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, K. I., & Niemann, Y. F. (1998). Black and white tokens in academia: A difference of chronic versus acute distinctiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 954–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F. (1994). Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality, 62, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., Morf, C., Hazlett, S., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Self-handicapping: The role of discounting and augmentation in the preservation of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, H. E. S., Crisp, R. J., & Suen, M.-W. (2007). Improving performance expectancies in stereotypic domains: Task relevance and the reduction of stereotype threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 586–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., DuBois, C. L. Z., & Noe, A. W. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saenz, D. S., & Lord, C. G. (1989). Reversing roles: A cognitive strategy for undoing memory deficits associated with token status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 698–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Noe, R. A. (1986). Personnel selection and equal employment opportunity. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 71–116). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segovia, F., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). I’m white, you’re black, but we’re all women: Emphasizing common identity improves intergroup relations for white women. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science, Kansas City, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2002). The differential effects of solo status on members of high- and low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 694–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaquaptewa, D., Waldman, A., & Thompson, M. (2007). Solo status and self-construal: Being distinctive influences racial self-construal and performance apprehension in African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 321–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, R. M., Smith, M. A., Shelton, J. N., Rowley, S. A. J., & Chavous, T. M. (1998). Multidimensional model of racial identity: A reconceptualization of African American racial identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 18–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, J. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances, private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangor, C., Carr, C., & Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1191–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 34 (pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 11. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. D., & Hollenshead, C. (2001). Resisting from the margins: The coping strategies of black women and other women of color faculty members at a research university. The Journal of Negro Education, 70, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2002). When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Digest of Education Statistics, 2008 (NCES 2009–020), Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, M. J. T., Lott, B., García-Vázquez, E., Grant, S. K., Iwamasa, G. Y., Molina, L. E., Ragsdale, B. L., & Vestal-Dowdy, E. (2006). Personal reflections: Barriers and strategies in increasing diversity in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The non-verbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & Society, 5, 178–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 815–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D., Schliecher, T. L., & McDonald, T. W. (1998). Empowering token women leaders: The importance of organizationally legitimated credibility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D., & Sinnett, L. M. (1985). Is it all in the numbers? A case study of tokenism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zárate, M. A., & Smith, E. R. (1990). Person categorization and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 8, 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Denise Sekaquaptewa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Stephanie A. Fryberg Ernesto Javier Martínez

Copyright information

© 2014 Stephanie A. Fryberg and Ernesto Javier Martínez

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sekaquaptewa, D. (2014). On Being the Solo Faculty Member of Color. In: Fryberg, S.A., Martínez, E.J. (eds) The Truly Diverse Faculty. The Future of Minority Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456069_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation