Skip to main content

Junior Faculty of Color in the Corporate University

Implications of Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism on Research, Teaching, and Service

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The Future of Minority Studies ((FMS))

Abstract

In academe today, an overwhelming acceptance by university administrations of a neoliberal ideology that advances corporate logics of efficiency and profit maximization is commonplace (Aronowitz, 2000; Giroux, 2002, 2007; Shumar, 2008). Advancing government deregulation, privatization of public services, and the lowering of public expenditures, neoliberalism, as the dominant ideology in Western societies today, advances a corporate culture driven by profit generation as a model for the functioning of all spheres of society (Bourdieu, 1998; Caanan & Shumar, 2008; Chomsky, 2003; Duménil, 2011; Giroux, 2002, 2004; Olssen & Peters, 2005; Robbins, 2004; Sloan, 2008). Furthermore, reinforcing neoliberalism, neoconservative ideals today promote so-called individual responsibility in place of the public good; social Darwinism; the acceptance of social inequities as “common sense”; and conservative control of curricula, pedagogy, and knowledge production (Apple, 2006; Harvey, 2005; Hill, 2007). In American higher education, these logics are reflected in decision making about what is taught, how material is taught, who teaches, who does research, who belongs, what counts as valid research and, ultimately, in decision making about the goals and purposes of higher education (Apple, 2006; Giroux, 2002, 2004, 2007; Hill, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Association of University Professors. (2009). 2008–2009 report on the economic status of the profession. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.aaup.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (2005). In the name of diversity: Education and the commoditization and consumption of race in the United States. Urban Review, 37(5), 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., & Kanner, M. (2011). Inventing a gay agenda: Students’ perceptions of lesbian and gay professors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1538–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. J., & Smith, G. (2005). Students preconceptions of professors: Benefits and barriers according to ethnicity and gender. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(2), 184–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2006). Understanding and interrupting neoliberalism and neoconservatism in education. Pedagogies, 1(1), 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aptheker, B. (1966). Big business and the American university. New York: New Outlook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S. (2000). The knowledge factory: Dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset: The paradox of faculty voices. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities. Retrieved October 3, 2010, from http://www.aplu.org/document.doc?id=1879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education, 39, 363–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, C. W. (1990). Universities and the capitalist state: Corporate liberalism and the reconstruction of American higher education, 1894–1928. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauder, H. (2006). Learning to become a geographer: Reproduction and transformation in academia. Antipode, 38(4), 671–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, H. (1947). Men who control our universities: The economic and social composition of governing boards of thirty leading American universities. Morningside Heights, NY: King’s Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., Morrow, M., & Tastsoglou, E. (1999). Teaching in environments of resistance: Toward a critical, feminist, and antiracist pedagogy. In M. Mayberry & E. Rose (Eds.), Meeting the challenge: Innovative feminist pedagogies in action (pp. 23–46). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (2004). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). The essence of neoliberalism. Le Monde diplomatique. Retrieved June 28, 2010, from http://mondediplo.com.

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, M. (2008). How the university works: Higher education and the low-wage nation. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, B., Eckel, P., Códova, D., & White, B. (2008). Broadening the leadership spectrum: Advancing diversity in the American college presidency. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubacher, J. S., & Rudy, W. (1958). Higher education in transition: An American history, 1636–1956. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulé, E. (2004). Going to the market: Neoliberalism and the social construction of the university student as an autonomous consumer. In M. Reimer (Ed.), Inside corporate U: Women in the academy speak out (pp. 247–264). Toronto: Sumach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canaan, J. E., & Shumar, W. (Eds.). (2008). Structure and agency in the neoliberal university. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M. A., & Swanson, J. (2003). Funding for qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 852–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheek J. (2005). The practices and politics of funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. (pp. 387–409). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2003). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronicle of Higher Education. (2010). Assistant/associate professor of science education [Job advertisement]. Retrieved June 17, 2010, from http://www.chronicle.com.

  • Church, J. (2008). Managing knowledge: Intellectual property, instructional design and the manufacturing of higher education In J. Caanan & W. Shumar (Eds.), Structure and agency in the neoliberal university (pp. 33–44). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Hudson, E., & Steel, J. (2003). The emperor’s new clothes: Globalisation and e-learning in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B., & Códova, D. (2006). Minorities in higher education: Twenty-second annual status report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M. L. (1910). Academic and industrial efficiency. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curti, M., & Nash, R. (1965). Philanthropy in the shaping of American higher education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dare, A. (2011). (Dis)embodied difference in the online class: Vulnerability, visibility and social justice. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 7(2). Retrieved August 5, 2011, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no2/dare_0611.htm.

  • Davis, J. (1941). Capitalism and its culture. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Bernal, D., & Villalpondo, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in the academy: The struggle over “legitimate” knowledge for faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggs, G., Garrison-Wade, D., Estrada, D., & Galindo, R. (2009). Smiling faces and colored spaces: The experiences of faculty of color pursuing tenure in the academy. Urban Review, 47(4), 312–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, F. (2008). The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G. (2011). The crisis of neoliberalism. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duster, T. (1972). The aims of higher learning and the control of the universities. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Pamphlet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engell, J., & Dangerfield, A. (2005). Saving higher education in the age of money. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosdick, R. B. (1962). Adventures in giving: The story of the General Education Board. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2003). Spectacles of race and pedagogies of denial: Antiblack racist pedagogy under the rein of neoliberalism. Communication Education, 52(3–4), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2004). Proto-fascism in America: Neoliberalism and the demise of democracy. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2006). Spectacles of race and pedagogies of denial: Antiblack racist pedagogy. In D. Macedo & P. Gounari (Eds.), The globalization of racism (pp. 68–93). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2007). The university in chains: Confronting the military-industrial-complex. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. (2009). The threat of race: Reflections on racial neoliberalism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. M. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J., & Metcalfe, A. (2010). Whose web of knowledge is it anyway? Citing feminist research in the field of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 81(2), 140–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (2007). Critical teacher education, new labour and the global project of neoliberal capital. Policy Futures in Education, 5(2), 204–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J., & Gomez, G. (2008). On the pathway to the presidency: Characteristics of higher education’s senior leadership. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirp, D. (2004). Shakespeare, Einstein and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Tierney, W. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, E., & Romero, M. (2001). In the image and likeness: How mentoring functions in the hidden curriculum. In E. Margolis (Ed.), The hidden curriculum in higher education (pp. 79–96). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (1998). Information liberation. London: Freedom.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, E. J. (1936). The control of higher education in America. Educational Record, 17, 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mr. Rockefeller’s Educational Trust. (1907). Current literature, XLVII (3), 253–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Retrieved October 9, 2011, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_260.asp.

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Educational Policy, 20(3), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osei-Kofi, N. (2007). Daring to dream: In search of freedom. In R. Martin (Ed.), Transforming the academy: Struggles and strategies for women in higher education, 2 (pp. 7–8). Tehachapi, CA: GrayMill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osei-Kofi, N., Shahjahan, R., & Patton, L. (2010). Centering social justice in the study of higher education: Strategies and possibilities for institutional change. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, S. (2002). The colorblind cyberclass: Myth and fact. In B. TuSmith & M. Reddy (Eds.), Race in the college classroom: Pedagogy and politics (pp. 264–276). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, M. (2000). The myth of the liberal campus. In G. D. White & F. C. Hauck (Eds.), Campus, Inc.: Corporate power in the ivory tower (pp. 85–92). New York: Prometheus Books (Original work published in 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, H. S. (1906). The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: First annual report of the president and treasurer. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, R. (2004). Global problems and the culture of capitalism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, T., Kelsey, K., & Lin, H. (2010). Enhancing online education through instructor skill development in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). Retrieved October 9, 2011, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/winter134/roman_kelsey134.html.

  • Rudolf, F. (1990). The American college and university: A history. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. (Original work published 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., & Akins, L. (2005). 2004 policies, and the composition of governing boards of public colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahjahan, R. (2012). The role of international organizations in globalizing higher education policy. In J. Smart & M. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 27 (pp. 369–407). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shumar, W. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumar, W. (2008). Space, place and the American university. In J. Caanan & W. Shumar (Eds.), Structure and agency in the neoliberal university (pp. 67–83). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, K. (2008). The expanding educational service sector: Neoliberalism and the corporatization of curriculum at the local level in the US. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(5), 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2009). Diversity’s promise for higher education: Making it work. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. N. (1974). Who rules the universities? An essay in class analysis. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (2000). Forging our identity: Transformative resistance in the areas of work, class and the law: The tyrannies of the untenured professor of color. UC Davis Law Review, 33(4), 1105–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soley, L. (1995). Leasing the ivory tower: The corporate takeover of academia. Boston: South End.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. (2002). Tenure and academic freedom in the academy: Historical parameters and new challenges. In J. E. Cooper & D. D. Stevens (Eds.), Tenure in the sacred grove: Issues and strategies for women and minority faculty (pp. 57–70). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J. (2000). Engaging student resistance to feminism: “How is this stuff going to make us better teachers?” Gender and Education, 12(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomei, L. (2006). The impact of online teaching on faculty load: Computing the ideal class size for online courses. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 531–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, C. A. (2009). Education and neoliberal globalization. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. (2009). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C., González, J., & Wood, J. (2008). Faculty of color in academe: What 20 years of literature tells us. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(3), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TuSmith, B., & Reddy, M. (Eds.). (2002). Race in the college classroom: Pedagogy and politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukpokodu, O. (2008). Teachers’ reflections on pedagogies that enhance learning in an online course on teaching for equity and social justice. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(3), 227–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1918). Higher learning in America. Retrieved June 28, 2010, from http://www.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3113/veblen/higher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, J. (2006). University Inc.: The corporate corruption of higher education. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. D., & Hauck, F. C. (Eds.). (2000). Campus, Inc.: Corporate power in the ivory tower (pp. 13–26). New York: Prometheus Books. (Originally published in 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (2001). Faculty attitudes about distance learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 24(2), 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (1999). A people’s history of the United States: 1492-present, 20th ed. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. (2005). Equity and excellence in American higher education. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Stephanie A. Fryberg Ernesto Javier Martínez

Copyright information

© 2014 Stephanie A. Fryberg and Ernesto Javier Martínez

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osei-Kofi, N. (2014). Junior Faculty of Color in the Corporate University. In: Fryberg, S.A., Martínez, E.J. (eds) The Truly Diverse Faculty. The Future of Minority Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456069_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics