Abstract
As discussed in the previous chapters, Cambodian primary education has experienced rapid expansion of access in the last decade. As a result, one priority for policy in the primary education subsector shifted from quantitative expansion in 2000s to qualitative improvement in 2010s. One of the measures taken by the government in cooperation with development partner is to improve classroom practices by replacing traditional, “chalk-and-talk” practices with modern, student-centered pedagogies, which are now elaborated and incorporated in a comprehensive framework called Child Friendly School (CFS).1 Having been piloted since 2002, CFS became a national policy in 2007, thereby implying that all primary schools should employ child friendly approaches. Indeed, reforming teaching and learning is the second dimension of CFS framework and the most important challenge to many primary schools (Table 4.1).
This chapter is based on the author’s dissertation, How Cambodian pedagogical reform has been constructed: A multi-level case study submitted to Michigan State University.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, R. J. 2001. Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Anderson-Levitt, K. 2004. “Reading lessons in Guinea, France, and the United States: Local meanings or global culture?” Comparative Education Review 48(3): 229–252.
Ayres, D. M. 2000. Anatomy of a crisis: Education, development, and the state in Cambodia, 1953–1998. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Brodie, K., Lelliott, A., and Davis, H. 2002. “Forms and substance in learner-centered teaching: Teachers’ take-up from an in-service programme in South Africa.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18(5): 541–559.
Cohen, D. K. 1990. “A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 311–329. doi:10.3102/01623737012003311.
Courtney, J. and Gravelle, M. 2013. “Switching sides: The struggle between national identity and globalized pedagogy in the development of an early literacy programme in Cambodia.” Citizenship Teaching & Learning 8(3): 309– 325. doi:10.1386/ctl.8.3.309_1.
Gu, L., Huang, R., and Marton, F. 200). “Teaching with variation: A Chinese way of promoting effective mathematics learning.” In Lianghuo, J., Cai, J., and Wong, N.-Y. (eds.) How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders, pp. 309–347. Singapore: World Scientific.
Headley, R. K. 1977. Cambodian-English Dictionary, Volume I and II. Washington, DC: Catholic University of American Press.
Kingdom of Cambodia. 2007. Child Friendly School Policy. Phnom Penh: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, n.d. ETL Training Manual. Phnom Penh: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport.
Needham, S. 2003. “‘This is active learning’: Theories of language, learning, and social relations in the transmission of Khmer Literacy.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 34(1): 27–49. doi:10.1525/aeq.2003.34.1.27.
O’Sullivan, M. 2002. “Reform implementation and the realities within which teachers work: A Namibian case study.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education 32(2): 219. doi:10.1080/03057920220143192.
O’Sullivan, M. (2004). “The reconceptualisation of learner-centred approaches: a Namibian case study.” International Journal of Educational Development 24(6): 585–602. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(03)00018-X.
Pearson, J. 2011. Creative capacity development: Learning to adapt in development practice. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
Reimer, J. K. 2012. Local negotiation of globalised educational discourses: The case of child friendly schools in rural Cambodia. Dissertation submitted to University of British Columbia. Retrieved on July 3, 2014 at https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/43691.
Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57(1): 1–22.
Tobin, J. J., Hsueh, Y., and Karasawa, M. 2009. Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
UNICEF. 2009, May. Child-friendly schools manual. New York: UNICEF.
Vavrus, F. and Bartlett, L. 2013. Teaching in Tension: International pedagogies, national policies, and teachers’ practices in Tanzania. Rotterdam; Boston: SensePublishers.
Wheeler, C. W. 1998. Rebuilding technical capacity in UNICEF/Sida supported school clusters: A study of UNICEF’s Capacity-Building (Education) Project 01. Phnom Penh: UNICEF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Takayo Ogisu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ogisu, T. (2016). Pedagogy in Cambodian Schools. In: Kitamura, Y., Edwards, D.B., Sitha, C., Williams, J.H. (eds) The Political Economy of Schooling in Cambodia. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456007_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456007_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57740-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45600-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)