Abstract
History does not change, but interpretations often do, and in a way quite unrelated to their subject. Japan’s course through modern history is no exception to this, and especially the interpretation of the great watershed that traditionally divides Japan’s modern past from the present, the Asia-Pacific War (1937–1945). Throughout Japan’s postwar period unto the end of the Cold War, the conventional reading of the Asia-Pacific War and its build-up in the 1930s was one of a singular aberration from Japan’s otherwise successful path of modernization and integration into the international community. The war from this perspective had been a fateful Manichaean conflict between the principles of militarism and democracy, of which the latter triumphed and to which Japan pledged itself through declaring unconditional surrender in August 1945. Thus, interpreting the war as the ultimate watershed enabled both parties to start from scratch, and leave the scorched past behind. And to be sure, on the surface no picture could offer a greater contrast between wartime (including the 1930s) and postwar Japan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Suggested readings
Dower, John W., Empire and Aftermath: Yoshida Shigeru and the Japanese Experience, 1878–1954. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Council on East Asian Studies, 1979.
Duus, Peter, Myers, Ramon H., and Peattie, Mark R., eds, The Japanese Wartime Empire: 1931–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Hotta, Eri, Pan-Asianism and Japan’s War, 1931–1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Iriye, Akira, Power and Culture: The Japanese-American War, 1941–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
Obata, Kaoru, “Historical Functions of Monism with Primacy of International Law—A View Based on the Japanese Experience during the Early Period of the Allied Occupation,” The Japanese Annual of International Law 49 (2006): 1–35.
Onuma, Yasuaki, “‘Japanese International Law’ in the postwar period—perspectives on the teaching and research of international law in prewar Japan,” The Japanese Annual of International Law 33 (1990): 25–53.
Saaler, Sven, and Szpilman, Christopher, eds, Pan-Asianism—A Documentary History, 1860–2006, 2 vols. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011.
Zachmann, Urs Matthias, “Race and International Law in Japan’s New Order in East Asia, 1938–1945,” in Rotem Kowner and Walter Demel, eds, Race and Racism in Modern East Asia: Western and Eastern Constructions. Leiden: Brill, 2013, pp. 453–73.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Urs Matthias Zachmann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zachmann, U.M. (2015). Japan’s Transition from “Greater East Asia” to a Trans-Pacific Order, 1931–1960. In: Johnson, R.D. (eds) Asia Pacific in the Age of Globalization. The Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455383_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455383_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49815-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45538-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)