Abstract
Chapter 9 started to consider the whole issue of ending a conflict “once and for all”, but immediately confronted the problem that while particularly violent forms of behaviour could cease, this might do nothing to affect the way in which individuals and communities thought and felt about one another. It might also do less than nothing to influence the issues that gave rise to the conflict in the first place. Moreover, even if adversaries could, indeed, be brought to a state in which they had abandoned strategies of violence and coercion — or even felt reconciled to past antagonisms — and were prepared to coexist with one another, the contradictions and contradictory goals which led to the violent behaviour could remain in place, unresolved and ready to lead back to further antagonisms and future harmful behaviour that would start up the cycle once again.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Christopher Mitchell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, C. (2014). Termination II. In: The Nature of Intractable Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454157_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454157_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-4519-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45415-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)