Skip to main content

The Hybrid War Model: A Complex Adaptive Model of Complex Urban Conflict

  • Chapter
  • 267 Accesses

Part of the book series: The OR Essentials series ((ORESS))

Abstract

This paper firstly discusses the modelling of Peace Support Operations (PSO) within the defence simulation modelling context. It then provides a summary background of the current relevant approaches in such modelling, taking account of the increasing complexity of the strategic environment, and the relevance of ideas from Complex Adaptive Systems theory. It goes on to describe the details of two agent-based models spanning the problem domain, which capture the key ideas of complexity, within a PSO context, taking account of the complex interactions between peacekeepers, civilians, insurgents and nongovernmental organisations involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberts D and Hayes R (1995). Command Arrangements for Peace Operations. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts D and Hayes R (2007). Planning: Complex Endeavours. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts D, Garstka J and Stein F (2003). Network Centric Warfare. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson S and Moffat J (2005). The Agile Organisation: From Informal Networks to Complex Effects and Agility. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobias P and Sprague K (2009). Intermittency of casualties in asymmetric warfare. J Battlefield Technol 12(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frewer L (2007). The development of an agent based model to investigate possible power law relationships in peacekeeping operations PhD Thesis, Cranfield University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley DS (2009). Requirements for a DIME/PMESII Model. https://home.comcast.net/~dshartley3/NRL/NRL.htm, date accessed 30 July 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illachinksi A (2004). Artificial War: Multi-agent Based Simulation of Combat. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd: Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N and Spagat M (2005). From old wars to new wars and global terrorism Cornell University Library Archive Reference arXiv:Physics/0506213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauren M (2003). On the temporal distribution of casualties and determination of medical logistical requirements New Zealand DTA Report 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauren M and Stephen R (2002). Map-aware non-uniform automata (MANA): A New Zealand approach to scenario modelling. J Battlefield Technol 5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauren M, Stephen R and Hore N (2003). Application of the MANA model to operations in East Timor New Zealand DTA Report 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defence (2002). The Strategic Defence Review: A New Chapter Cmd 5566. The Stationery Office: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat J (2002). Command and Control in the Information Age—Representing its Impact. The Stationery Office: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat J (2003). Complexity Theory and Network Centric Warfare. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat J (2007). Modelling human decision-making in simulation models of conflict. The CCRP International C2 Journal 1(1): 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2002). NATO Code of Best Practice for C2 Assessment. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins G (1998). Strategy, Force Planning and Diplomatic/Military Operations. The Royal Institute of International Affairs: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G and Bertsche K (2003). Agent based simulation of (de-)escalation in Peace Support Operations. In Proceedings of 20th International Symposium on Military Operational Research (20 ISMOR), UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E (2003). Effects Based Operations. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E (2006). Complexity, Networking and Effects-based Approaches to Operations. US DoD CCRP: Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr S, Haut D and Hughes W (1997). Developing intellectual tools to support C4ISR analyses for operations other than war. In Proceedings of 3rd ICCRTS. National Defense University; Fort McNair, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Operational Research Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moffat, J., Bathe, M., Frewer, L. (2015). The Hybrid War Model: A Complex Adaptive Model of Complex Urban Conflict. In: Forder, R.A. (eds) OR, Defence and Security. The OR Essentials series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454072_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics