Skip to main content

Cows, Cabins and Tweets: Posthuman Intra-active Affect and Feminist Fire in Secondary School

  • Chapter
Posthuman Research Practices in Education

Abstract

I think one of the main turning points for me and my interests in this (feminist) group was when we got loads of the year nine girls (age 13–14) in and we were talking about the normalized cat-calling and the skirt being lifted up and you kind of think ‘that happened to me too’. And they’re these thirteen year old little girls and it’s really sad and it’s so common that you just kind of blank it out. But when you see these young girls quite petrified and upset by things, it really sets off a little fire in you and it shouldn’t be tolerated.

(Stella, Parkland School, Focus Group)

I think that girls have this taught thing to be kind of quiet and if we are upset … if something’s happened to us that we are not happy about we can’t really talk about it we just carry on and I think you kind of realize that when girls are given a platform or even a class room where they can talk about things and they are safe then how much people feel they can say, and that’s important.

(Anna, year 11, Parkland School, Focus Group)

Feminism has always been incendiary and fiery, spreading and catching through group affects and generating fierce reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, C. (1990/2000) The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory (London: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2009) ‘Affective Atmospheres’, Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham and London: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2008) The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture (Durham and London: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, S. and L. Portwood-Stacer (2015) ‘Introduction: Feminism, Hashtags and Violence against Women and Girls’, Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 341–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M. (1999) Feeling Power: Emotions and Education (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (1993) Unbearable Weight Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013) The Posthuman (London: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. (2004) The Transmission of Affect (Ithica: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, G., H. Manchester and S. Allendyke (2012) ‘Space, Place, and Social Justice in Education: Growing a Bigger Entanglement: Editors’ Introduction’, Qualitative Inquiry, 19(10), 747–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T. (2009) ‘The New Empiricism: Affect and Sociological Method’, European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. J. and P. Alldred (2014) ‘New Materialist Social Inquiry: Designs, Methods and the Research Assemblage’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. and G. Siegworth (eds.) (2010) The Affect Theory Reader (Durham: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (2012) ‘Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation’, Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A. (2013) ‘Affect as Method: Feelings, Aesthetics and Affective Pedagogy’, in R. Coleman and J. Ringrose (eds.) Deleuze and Research Methodologies (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iedema, R. and K. Carroll (2015) ‘Research as Affect-Sphere: Towards Spherogenics’, Emotion Review, 7(1), 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juelskjaer, M. (2013) ‘Gendered Subjectivities of Spacetimematter’, Gender and Education, 25(6), 754–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. and J. Ringrose (2015) ‘ “But then Feminism Goes Out the Window!”: Exploring Teenage Girls’ Critical Response to Celebrity Feminism’, Celebrity Studies, DOI:10.1080/19392397.2015.1005402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, R. (2012) ‘Touching, Unbelonging, and the Absence of Affect’, Feminist Theory, 13(2), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg, S. (2011) ‘Assemblage/Apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault’, Area, 43(2) (June), 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation (Durham: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palipane, K. (2011) ‘The Struggle to Belong: Dealing with Diversity in 21st Century Urban Settings’, http://www.rc21.org/conferences/amsterdam2011/edocs/Session%201/RT1–1-Palipane.pdf, accessed 22 July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2015) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedwell, C. and A. Whitehead (2012) ‘Affecting Feminism: Questions of Feeling in Feminist Theory’, Feminist Theory, 13(2), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. (2011) ‘I Would Rather Be a Cyborg than a Goddess: Intersectionality, Assemblage and Affective Politics, EIPCP’, http://eipcp.net/transversal/0811/puar/en, accessed 22 July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E. (forthcoming) ‘ “Feel What I Feel”: An Onto-cartography of Teen Girls, Sexual Violence and Creative Activism’, Journal of Gender Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E. and G. Ivinson, (2014) ‘Horse-Girl Assemblages: Towards a Post-human Cartography of Girls’ Desire in an Ex-mining Valleys Community’, Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E. and J. Ringrose (2011) ‘Schizoid Subjectivities?: Re-theorising Teen-girls’ Sexual Cultures in an Era of “Sexualisation”’, Journal of Sociology: Special Issue: Youth Transitions, 47(4): 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retallack, H., J. Ringrose and E. Lawrence (2016) ‘“Fuck Your Body Image”: Teen Girls’ Twitter and Instagram Feminism in and around School’, in J. Coffey Shelley Budgeon and Helen Cahill (eds.) Learning Bodies: The Body in Youth and Childhood Studies (London: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J. and E. Renold (2014) “‘F**k Rape!”: Mapping Affective Intensities in a Feminist Research Assemblage’, Qualitative Inquiry, doi:10.1177/1077800 414530261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottenberg, C. (2013) ‘The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism’, Cultural Studies, 28(3), 418–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1990) The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues (London: Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2012) Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding (London: Sage)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Jessica Ringrose and Emma Renold

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ringrose, J., Renold, E. (2016). Cows, Cabins and Tweets: Posthuman Intra-active Affect and Feminist Fire in Secondary School. In: Taylor, C.A., Hughes, C. (eds) Posthuman Research Practices in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453082_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics