Abstract
‘Letting the other be as other’ obviously does not mean here that one will not establish a relation with an other, that one will leave the other alone, or that one and other will not interact with one another. Irigaray’s philosophy has no room for thinking in that way. On the contrary, her entire work involves a sustained engagement with the relational aspects of human life. One of the most important questions for her is, precisely, how to establish a relationship between two individuals who are irreducible to one another, without reducing them to a one. In her ethics of difference I and the other remain two, and whereas we are related to one another, through our relationship, each realizes its own becoming, its own blossoming.
The highest rule of the word would consist in not appropriating the thing but letting it be as thing. What is sought here is beyond: how to let be the other as other while speaking, speaking to them. Moreover: how to encourage the other to be and to remain other. How to let the other come into presence, even to lead them there, without claiming to be their founding.
(Luce Irigaray, The Way of Love, p. 29)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arendt, Hannah, Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (New York: Viking Press, 1968).
Ellsworth, Elizabeth, ‘Why Doesn’t this Feel Empowering? Working through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy’, Harvard Education Review 59:3 (1989), pp. 297–324.
Fisher, Berenice Malka, No Angel in the Classroom: Teaching through Feminist Discourse (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001).
Gore, Jennifer Mary, ‘What We Can Do for You! What Can “We” Do for “You”? Struggling over Empowerment in Critical and Feminist Pedagogy’, in Carmen Luke and Jennifer Mary Gore (eds), Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy (New York: Routledge, 1992), pp. 54–73.
-, ‘What We Can Do for You! What Can “We” Do for “You”? Struggling over Empowerment in Critical and Feminist Pedagogy’, in Carmen Luke and Jennifer Mary Gore (eds), The Struggle for Pedagogies: Critical and Feminist Discourses as Regimes of Truth (New York: Routledge, 1993).
Irigaray, Luce, I Love to You: Sketch for a Felicity Within History, tr. Alison Martin (New York and London: Routledge, 1996).
-, The Way of Love, tr. Heidi Bostic and Stephen Pluhàcĕk (London and New York: Continuum, 2002).
-, ‘Listening, Thinking, Teaching’, in Luce Irigaray with Mary Green (eds), Luce Irigaray: Teaching (London and New York: Continuum, 2008), pp. 231–40.
-, Sharing the World (London and New York: Continuum, 2008).
Luke, Carmen, ‘Feminist Pedagogy Theory: Reflections on Power and Authority’, Educational Theory 46:3 (1996), pp. 283–302.
Marchbank, Jen, Letherby, Gayle, Lander, Kay, Walker, Angela, and Wild, Andrea, ‘Empowering and Enabling or Patronizing and Pressurising? Opening Dialogues between Staff and Students’, Gender and Education 15:1 (2003), pp. 75–90.
Mintz, Avi, ‘Has Therapy Intruded into Education?’, Journal of Philosophy of Education 43:4 (2009), pp. 633–47.
Morley, Louise, ‘All You Need is Love: Feminist Pedagogy for Empowerment and Emotional Labour in The Academy’, International Journal of Inclusive Education 2:1 (1998), pp. 15–27.
Noddings, Nel, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).
-, ‘An Ethic of Caring and Its Implications for Instructional Arrangements’, American Journal of Education 96:2 (1988), pp. 215–30.
-, Women and Evil (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989).
-, Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).
-, ‘Caring in Education’, The Encyclopedia of Informal Education (2005) http://www.infed.org/biblio/noddings_caring_in_education.htm (accessed 19 November 2011).
-, Philosophy of Education, 2nd edn (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007).
Rhoades, Kathleen Ann, ‘Women’s Studies Students and the Politics of Empowerment: A Qualitative Study’ (PhD Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1996).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Tomoka Toraiwa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toraiwa, T. (2015). Enabling Education: Rethinking the Teacher-Student Relationship through Luce Irigaray’s Ethics of Difference. In: Irigaray, L., Marder, M. (eds) Building a New World. Palgrave Studies in Postmetaphysical Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453020_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453020_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49759-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45302-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)