Abstract
Psychoanalytic interpretations of subject development generally associate passivity with the negative set of hierarchized binary pairs that include male-female, active-passive and subject-object, in which the passive feminine object is defined against the active masculine subject. Interpretations of passivity focus on its contingency: the passive feminine object is acted upon, determined by an external agency, and submitted to limitations and suffering. Theories of subjectivity rarely acknowledge possible active or strategic forms of passivity: for example, the non-participatory, the uncooperative and the inert. Following Luce Irigaray’s position that the purpose of a larger, feminist, psychoanalytic project is not simply to contribute towards reforming an imaginary in which the woman is subject rather than object — which could merely reproduce a sort of dichotomy — but to destabilize the mechanism of subject formation at its core, passivity must be considered independent of a binary position in order to permit the emergence of a feminine subjectivity that is neither contingent upon nor subordinate to masculine activity. In particular, passivity must be reinterpreted outside the phallogocentric symbolic order, and the resultant connotations of mere receptivity and contingency which associates activity with visibility and presence, so as to blur the borders of subject formation that exclude femininity and feminine agency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Althusser, Louis, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, tr. B. Brewster (New York: Monthly Review, 2001), pp. 85–126.
Butler, Judith, ‘Bodies that matter’, ed. C. Burke, N. Schor and M. Whitford, Engaging with Irigaray (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 141–73.
Cameron, Ed, ‘Matthew Lewis and the Gothic Horror of Obsessional Neurosis’, Studies in the Humanities, 32, 2 (2005), pp. 168–200.
Derrida, Jacques, Dissemination (London: Continuum, 1981).
Freud, Sigmund, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. and tr. James Strachey (London: Hogarth, 1919).
Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich, Phenomenology of Spirit, tr. A.V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
Heidegger, Martin, On the Way to Language, tr. P.D. Hertz (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1971).
Hodge, J., ‘Irigaray Reading Heidegger’, ed. C. Burke, N. Schor and M. Whitford, Engaging with Irigaray (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 191–210.
Irigaray, Luce, Speculum of the Other Woman, tr. C. Gill (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).
-, This Sex Which Is Not One, tr. C. Porter with C. Burke (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).
-, An Ethics of Sexual Difference, tr. C. Burke and G.C. Gill (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).
-, I Love to You, tr. A. Martin (New York: Routledge, 1996).
-, The Forgetting of Air in Martin Heidegger, tr. B. Mader (Austin: Texas University Press, 1999).
-, To Be Two, tr. M.M. Rhodes and M.F. Cocito-Monoc (New York: Routledge, 2001).
-, To Speak is Never Neutral, tr. G. Schwab (New York: Routledge, 2002).
-, ‘Why Cultivate Difference? Toward a Culture of Two Subjects’ in ‘Dialogues’, special issue of Paragraph, 25 (Edinburgh: University Press, 2002), pp. 79–90.
Lacan, Jacques, Écrits, tr. Bruce Fink (New York: Norton, 2006).
Levinas, Emmanuel, Totality and Infinity, tr. A. Lingis (Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press, 1969).
Massé, Michelle, In the Name of Love: Women, Masochism, and the Gothic (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992).
Sandor, Andras, ‘Metaphor or Diaphor? On the Different Particular to Language’, Diogenes, 34 (1986), pp. 106–28.
Soloviova, Natalia, ‘Radcliffe’s Plot of Female Development’, in Alcindo Pinheiro Sousa, Luisa Marid Rodrqigues Flora and Teresa de Ataide Malafaia (eds), The Crossroads of Gender and Century Endings (Lisbon: Edições Colibri, 2000), pp. 39–47.
Wheelwright, Philip, Metaphor and Reality (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962).
Winter, Karl J., ‘Sexual/Textual Politics of Terror: Writing and Rewriting the Gothic Genre in the 1790s’, in K. Ackley (ed.), Misogyny in Literature (New York: Garland, 1992), pp. 89–103.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Dana Wight
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wight, D. (2015). Being Passive/Passive Being: Passivity as Self-Expression in Gothic Literature. In: Irigaray, L., Marder, M. (eds) Building a New World. Palgrave Studies in Postmetaphysical Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453020_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453020_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49759-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45302-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)