Abstract
Some economists suggest that sampling errors may resolve the Meese-Rogoff puzzle and that the forecasting power of exchange rate models is sensitive to sample selection. It is also suggested that the length of the estimation window is important in that using additional historical observations enhances forecasting performance. Furthermore, it is suggested that the selection of the forecasting window impacts forecasting performance. We find that a narrower estimation or forecasting window cannot explain the Meese-Rogoff puzzle. In general we find that changing the sample period and using different forecasting and estimation windows does not make much difference.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Imad A. Moosa and Kelly Burns
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moosa, I.A., Burns, K. (2015). Sampling Errors. In: Demystifying the Meese-Rogoff Puzzle. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452481_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452481_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49743-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45248-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)