Skip to main content
  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

Some economists suggest that sampling errors may resolve the Meese-Rogoff puzzle and that the forecasting power of exchange rate models is sensitive to sample selection. It is also suggested that the length of the estimation window is important in that using additional historical observations enhances forecasting performance. Furthermore, it is suggested that the selection of the forecasting window impacts forecasting performance. We find that a narrower estimation or forecasting window cannot explain the Meese-Rogoff puzzle. In general we find that changing the sample period and using different forecasting and estimation windows does not make much difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Imad A. Moosa and Kelly Burns

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moosa, I.A., Burns, K. (2015). Sampling Errors. In: Demystifying the Meese-Rogoff Puzzle. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452481_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics