Abstract
Indigeneity in South Africa is a complicated question. While it is clear that those of European descent, or to be more precise, those who under the apartheid system were classified as whites, are not thought of as indigenous, in practice the label has been restricted to those who can make a plausible claim to at least partial descent from the Khoesan populations even if, as is now generally the case, the only languages they speak are Germanic in origin, as well perhaps as isiXhosa. But even this is problematic. The way of life, and in all probability the language, that was observed by the first European visitors to the Cape, and is now known as Khoekhoe, was at that stage, in the sixteenth century, a relatively recent introduction into what is now South Africa. Just as around the beginning of the Common Era there were, to all extents and purposes, no Bantu-speakers or proponents of the agro-pastoralist lifestyle associated with them, so there were no Khoekhoe pastoralists in the region. The space which was to become South Africa was still exclusively populated by hunter-gatherers, presumably speaking one or more of the non-Khoe Khoesan languages.2 In various parts of the country, groups following a hunter-gatherer lifestyle, and speaking a San language, survived till late in the nineteenth century. Much more generally, though, the pre-Bantu and pre-Khoekhoe population of South Africa was absorbed into the society of their agricultural and pastoralist successors.
In general this article derives from R. Ross (2014), The Borders of Race in Colonial South Africa: The Kat River Settlement, 1829–1856 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In general this article derives from R. Ross (2014), The Borders of Race in Colonial South Africa: The Kat River Settlement, 1829–1856 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
J. Parkington and S. Hall (2010) ‘The Appearance of Food Production in Southern Africa: 1,000 to 2,000 Years ago’, in C. Hamilton, B. Mbenga and R. Ross (eds), The Cambridge History of South Africa, Vol. I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), and also R. Ross (2010) ‘Khoesan and Immigrants: The Emergence of Colonial Society at the Cape, 1500 to 1800’, in ibid.
G. Harinck (1969) ‘Interaction Between Xhosa and Khoi: Emphasis on the Period 1620–1750’, in L. Thompson (ed.), African Societies in Southern Africa (London: Heinemann);
J. Peires (1982) The House of Phalo: a History of the Xhosa People in the Days of Their Independence (Johannesburg: Ravan);
R. Ross (1980) ‘Ethnic Identity, Demographic Crises and Xhosa-Khoikhoi Interaction’, History in Africa, VII, pp. 259–71.
J. Peires (2012) ‘“He Wears Short Clothes!” Rethinking Rharhabe (c. 1715-c.1782)’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 38 (2), pp. 333–55.
T. J. Stapleton (1994) Maqoma: Xhosa Resistance to Colonial Advance 1798–1873 (Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball).
A. Stockenström (1854) Light and Shade, as Shown in the Character of the Hottentots of the Kat River Settlement and in the Conduct of the Colonial Government Towards Them (Cape Town: Saul Solomon).
R. Ross (1993) ‘Montagu’s Roads to Capitalism: the Distribution of Landed Property in the Cape Colony, 1845’, in Robert Ross, Beyond the Pale; Essays on the History of Colonial South Africa (Hanover and London: Wesleyan UP/UP of New England), pp. 192–211.
S. Trapido (1992) ‘The Emergence of Liberalism and the Making of “Hottentot Nationalism”, 1815–1834’, Collected Seminar Papers of the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London: The Societies of Southern Africa in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, p. 17.
D. van Arkel, C. Quispel and R. Ross (1993) ‘Going Beyond the Pale: On the Roots of White Supremacy in South Africa’, in Ross, Beyond the Pale, pp. 69–110; V. C. Malherbe (1997) ‘The Cape Khoisan in the Eastern Districts of the Colony Before and After Ordinance 50 of 1828’, PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.
W. M. Macmillan (1927) The Cape Colour Question: A Historical Survey (London: Faber & Gwyer), p. 249.
Berkeley to Pottinger 23 March 1847, in B. Le Cordeur and C. Saunders (1981), The War of the Axe, 1847: Correspondence Between the Governor of the Cape Colony, Sir Henry Pottinger, and the Commander of the British Forces at the Cape, Sir George Berkeley, and Others (Johannesburg: Brenthurst Press), p. 89.
J. M. Bowker (1962) Speeches, Letters and Selections from Important Papers (reprinted Cape Town: Struik), pp. 124–5.
Cited in R. Ross (1999) Status and Respectability in the Cape Colony, 1750–1870: A Tragedy of Manners (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 63.
D. Shaw (2009) ‘Two “Hottentots”, Some Scots and a West Indian Slave: The Origins of Kaatje Kekkelbek’, English Studies in Africa, 52, pp. 4–17;
P. R. Anderson (2012) ‘“Never Luff to Meddle Met Politics, Sir”: Errant Satire and Historical Gainsaying in A. G. Bain’s “Kaatje Kekkelbek, or, Life among the Hottentots”’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 28 (1), pp. 217–32, which also includes a transcript of the skit;
also E. Elbourne (2011) ‘Sara Baartman and Andries Stoffels: Violence, Law and the Politics of Spectacle in London and the Eastern Cape 1810–1836’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 45 (3), pp. 524–64.
J. Read Jr (1852) The Kat River Settlement in 1851: Described in a Series of Letters Published in the South African Commercial Advertiser (Cape Town: Saul Solomon), p. 47.
E. Bradlow (1989) ‘The “Great Fear” at the Cape of Good Hope, 1851–2’, International Journal of African Historical Studies, 23, pp. 401–2;
J. Marincowitz (1989) ‘From “Colour Question” to “Agrarian Problem” at the Cape: Reflections on the Interim’, in H. Macmillan and S. Marks (eds), Africa and Empire: W. M. Macmillan, Historian and Social Critic (London: Temple Smith for the Institute of Commonwealth Studies), pp. 155–60.
J. Peires (1987) ‘The Legend of Fenner-Solomon’, in B. Bozzoli (ed.), Class, Community and Conflict: South African Perspectives (Johannesburg; Ravan), pp. 65–92.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Robert Ross
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ross, R. (2015). The Possession and Dispossession of the Kat River Settlement. In: Laidlaw, Z., Lester, A. (eds) Indigenous Communities and Settler Colonialism. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452368_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452368_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49735-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45236-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)