Skip to main content

Inequality between Countries: An Ever More Heterogeneous Union?

  • Chapter
Book cover Report on the State of the European Union

Abstract

Determination, anxiety, resolution: the ambitions were high, and were made quite clear in both treaties. The Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), that laid the foundations of the European Monetary Union, made the objectives even more explicit: “strengthening” and “convergence” of the member states’ economies. In almost six decades, the European Community — now EU — has attracted most countries on the continent, enlarging membership from the six founding countries to 28; and in this long time span, there have indeed been major improvements in average standards of living throughout the EU. In particular, those countries that had not, for various reasons, benefited much from the three decades of fast economic growth that followed World War II in Western Europe, did catch up after adhesion: it has been so for Greece, Spain, Portugal and even more for Ireland during the 1980s and 1990s, and more recently for most new members from Central and Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean islands (Malta and Cyprus), at least up to onset of the Great Recession.

…to promote throughout the Community a harmonious development of economic activities, a continuous and balanced expansion, an increase in stability, an accelerated raising of the standard of living and closer relations between the States belonging to it.

Treaty of Rome , 1957

Resolved to achieve the strengthening and the convergence of their economies and to establish an economic and monetary union including, in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty, a single and stable currency.

Treaty of Maastricht , 1992

Determined to lay the foundations of an ever-closer union among the peoples of Europe.

Anxious to strengthen the unity of their economies and to ensure their harmonious development by reducing the differences existing between the various regions and the backwardness of the less favoured regions.

Article 2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balassa, B. (1964) “The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal”. Journal of Political Economy 72 (6): 584–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1967) “Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the European Common Market”. The Economic Journal : 77, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, P. (1988) The European Challenge, Commission of the European Communities, Brookfield, Gower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission (1988) “Cecchini Report”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.P. and Le Cacheux, J. (eds) (2010) Report on the State of the European Union, Vol.3, Crisis in the EU Economic Governance, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1992) Geography and Trade , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, É. and Le Cacheux, J. (2006) “Integrity and Efficiency in the EU: The Case Against the European Economic Constitution”. Centre for European Studies Working Paper Series (130), Harvard University, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cacheux, J. (ed.) (1996) Europe, La nouvelle vague . Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cacheux, J. (2009) “The Challenges and Trappings of Convergence”. L’Europe en formation, Journal of Studies on European Integration and Federalism 351, March: 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1994) “Facets of Balassa-Samuelson Thirty Years Later”. Review of International Economics 72 (3): 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1950) The Customs Union Issue , Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; Reprinted (2014), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Jacques Le Cacheux and Eloi Laurent

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Le Cacheux, J., Laurent, E. (2015). Inequality between Countries: An Ever More Heterogeneous Union?. In: Report on the State of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137451088_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics