Skip to main content

A Framework for Understanding the Acceptability of Rating Agency Methodologies

  • Chapter
Book cover Emerging Markets and Sovereign Risk
  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to explore the academic and other literature associated with the development and practices of international rating agencies and to develop a framework to understand the various rating agency methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antle, R (1984), ‘Auditor Independence’, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, D (2004), ‘AMP to Work on Ratings’, Herald-Sun, 8 March, News Ltd, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R, Gunter N & Otten R (2003), ‘Empirical Evidence on Corporate Governance in Europe: The Ellect on Stock Returns, Firm Valuation and Performance’, Journal of Asset Management, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 296–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D L & Caylor M L (2004), Corporate Governance Study: The Correlation between Corporate Governance and Company Performance, Corporate Governance Study, Institutional Shareholder Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, R & Packer F (1994), ‘The Credit Rating Industry’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, Summer-Fall, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, R & Packer F (1995), ‘The Credit Rating Industry’, The Journal of Fixed Income, vol. 5, no. 3 (December), pp. 10–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, R & Packer, F (1996), ‘Determinants and Impacts of Sovereign Credit Ratings’, Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 2, no. 2 (October), pp. 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, R & Packer, F (1997), ‘Difference of Opinion and Selection Bias in the Credit Rating Industry, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1395–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenburg, S, Greene, T & Erekson, H (2003), ‘Approaching Socially Responsible Investment with a Comprehensive Ratings Scheme: Total Social Impact’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, G, Liu L & Stiglitz, J (1999), ‘The Procyclical Role of Rating Agencies: Evidence from the East Asian Crisis’, Economic Notes, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, G (2002), ‘Sustainability Reporting — A Global Framework’, Company Director, November, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geld, D S & Strawser, J A (2001), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 1, no. 33, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P A, Ishii, L J & Metrick, A (2003), ‘Corporate Governance & Equity Prices’, Quarterly Journal Of Economics, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 107–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D (2003), Socially Responsible Investment in Australia, Ethical Investment Association, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, N & Sandford, Y (2002), Portfolio, Index & Futures Research: Are SRI Indices Responsible?, European Equities Research, Deutsche Bank AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J S & Freeman, R E (1999), ‘Stakeholders, Social Responsibility and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAEW (2000), Review of Guidance on Auditor Independence, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K M, Sutton, M H & Warfield, T D (2001), ‘Antecedents and Consequences of Independence Risk: Framework for Analysis’, Accounting Horizons, vol. 15, no. 1 (March), pp.1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company (2000), Investor Opinion Survey on Corporate Governance, McKinsey & Company, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfort, B & Mulder, C (2000), ‘The Impact of Using Sovereign Ratings by Credit Rating Agencies on the Capital Requirements for Banks: A Study of Emerging Market Economies’, IMF Working Paper, WP/00/69, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M L & Krausz, J (1996), ‘The Association Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 3, no. 15, pp. 321–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, G, Gay, G & Simnett, R (2002), Auditing Concepts and Methods, McGraw-Hill, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, L M & Bushman, T A (1996), ‘An Examination of Independence in Fact when Auditors Perform Nonaudit Services for Audit Clients’, Accounting Enquiries, vol. 6, no. 1 (August), pp. 91–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, R M, Hayobor, S & Agle, B R (1999), ‘The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance’, Business and Society, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shockley R A (1981), ‘Perceptions of Auditors’ Independence: An Empirical Analysis’, The Accounting Review, vol. 56, no. 4 (October), pp. 785–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uren, D (2003), The Transparent Corporation: Managing Demands for Disclosure, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S & Graves, S (1997), ‘The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnie, PHP (2003), ‘Are Unsolicited Credit Ratings Biased Downwards?’, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 193–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S (2004), ‘In Good Governance, Westpac Lights the Way’, The Australian, 17 February, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Nigel Finch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Finch, N. (2015). A Framework for Understanding the Acceptability of Rating Agency Methodologies. In: Finch, N. (eds) Emerging Markets and Sovereign Risk. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137450661_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics