Skip to main content

Assessing Incidental Vocabulary Learning by Chinese EFL Learners: A Test of the Involvement Load Hypothesis

  • Chapter
Assessing Chinese Learners of English

Abstract

One of the most challenging tasks for learners of a Second Language (L2 learners) consists in developing a vocabulary large enough to be able to read and write fluently and take part in conversations on a range of topics. According to Adolphs and Schmitt (2003) learners need 2000–3000 of the most frequent English word families to be able to take part in everyday conversations, whilst they need 5000 word families to begin to read authentic texts (Schmitt, 2007). For unassisted comprehension of written texts it is assumed learners need around 8000–9000 word families, and a vocabulary of 6000–7000 word families for spoken text (Nation, 2006). Many researchers have indicated that L2 learners worry about the formidable task of learning thousands of words (see for example Jones, 1995; Kim, 2008; Lawson & Hogden, 1996), particularly in contexts where learners have few opportunities to go to the country of the target language and/or have little knowledge about the target language culture, as is the case for many Chinese learners of English (Shao, 2014). For teachers it is equally challenging to find ways to help students acquire a wide range of words within the limited class time. Researchers can help address this issue by providing evidence regarding the effectiveness of different approaches to vocabulary learning and teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (4th ed.). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Ch. M., & Yang, M.-Y (1989). Lateralization in the visual perception of Chinese characters and words. Brain and Language, 36(4), 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Ramirez, G., Luo, Y., Geva, E., & Ku, Y.-M. (2012). Comparing vocabulary development in Spanish- and Chinese speaking ELLs: The effects of metalinguistic and sociocultural factors. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1991–2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Level of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behaviour, 11(6), 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4), 559–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics: Using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. (1999). Discussion: Incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., & Laufer, B. (2003). Type of task, time-on-task and electronic dictionaries in incidental vocabulary acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 349–381). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal

    Google Scholar 

  • glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (1998). Current research and practice in teaching vocabulary. The Language Teacher, 22(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe, A. (1995). Text-based tasks and incidental vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 11(2), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, A. (1998). What effects do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. R. (1995). Learning an alien lexicon: A teach-yourself case study. Second Language Research, 11(2), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. J. (2008). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 58(2), 285–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. J. (2011). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 100–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, Myong Hee (2005). Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrañaga, P., Treffers-Daller, J., Tidball, F., & Gil Ortega, M. (2012). L1-transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: the construct of task induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M. J., & Hogden, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of foreign-language students. Language Learning, 46(1), 101–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2004). An analysis of Chinese learners’ beliefs about the role of rote learning in vocabulary learning strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Sunderland, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., & Herman, P. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. Mckeown & M. Curtis (eds.). The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. London: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P., & Wang, K. (1999). Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(2), 355–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (eds.). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (2012). Automaticity and speed of lexical access: Acquisition and assessment. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (ed.). Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–210). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (eds.). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2007). Current perspectives on vocabulary teaching and learning. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (eds.). International handbook of English language teaching: Part II (pp. 827–841). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, X. (2014). A study of Chinese college students’ English reading anxiety. American Journal of Educational Research 2(5). Retrieved from: pubs.sciepub. com/education/2/5/10/

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Kilgarriff, A., & Sommers, S. (2008). Making better wordlists for ELT: Harvesting vocabulary lists from the web using WebBootCat. Retrieved from http://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/Publications/2008-SmithKilgSommers-DAE-BetterWordlists.doc

  • Yaqubi, B., Rayati, R. A., & Allemzade Gorgi, N. (2010). The involvement load hypothesis and vocabulary learning: The effect of task types and involvement index on L2 vocabulary acquisition. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(1), 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Chanchan Tang and Jeanine Treffers-Daller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tang, C., Treffers-Daller, J. (2016). Assessing Incidental Vocabulary Learning by Chinese EFL Learners: A Test of the Involvement Load Hypothesis. In: Yu, G., Jin, Y. (eds) Assessing Chinese Learners of English. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55397-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44978-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics