Abstract
In order to meet the growing demands for oral English proficiency certification among college students in China, the National College English Testing Committee, in collaboration with an IT company, has recently developed the computer-based College English Test—Spoken English Test (CET-SET) to replace the traditional face-to-face interview format. The previous face-to-face version used the group format of testing, where two examiners interviewed three candidates at a time. The candidates undertook several tasks as a group, one of which was a discussion task requiring the three of them to participate in a five-minute discussion among themselves (see National College English Testing Committee, 1999 for a detailed description). The computer-based CET-SET adopts similar testing procedures and tasks. However, it takes an examiner-absent paired format, in which two candidates are randomly paired and work on the test tasks on their own. One of the tasks is paired discussion, where the two candidates discuss a given topic through earphones. The reason for the switch from a group format to a paired format is the difficulties that raters may encounter in discerning more than two voices in the recordings when scoring the discussion task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, A. (1993). The role of test-taker feedback in the test development process: Test takers’ reactions to a tape-mediated test of proficiency in spoken Japanese. Language Testing, 10(3), 277–303.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). New York: Longman.
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing, 20(4), 369–383.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173–210.
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Færch, C. & Kasper, G. (1980). Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 5(1), 47–118.
Færch, C. & Kasper, G. (1983). On identifying communication strategies in interlanguage production. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 210–238). London: Longman.
Fulcher, G. (1993). The construction and validation of rating scales for oral tests in English as a foreign language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Lancaster.
Galaczi, E. (2004). Peer-peer interaction in a paired speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Galaczi, E. (2008). Peer-peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89–119.
He, L. Z. & Liu, R. J. (2004). 基于语料库的大学生交际策略研究 [Corpus-based Investigation into Communication Strategies in CET-SET]. 外语研究[ Foreign Languages Research], 1, 60–65.
Itakura, H. (2001). Describing conversational dominance. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 1859–1880.
Kasper, G. & Kellerman, E. (1997). Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Longman.
Kiddle, T. & Kormos, J. (2011). The effect of mode of response on a semi-direct test of oral proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(4), 342–360.
Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liddicoat, J. A. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.
May, L. (2007). Interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater’s perspective. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.
National College English Testing Committee. (1999). 大学英语四、六级考试口语考试大纲及样题 [College English Test-Spoken English Test Syllabus and Sample Test Papers]. Shanghai: Shangai Foreign Language Education Press.
North, B. (2000). The development of a common reference scale of language proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.
O’Loughlin, K. (1995). Lexical density in candidate output on direct and semi-direct versions of an oral proficiency test. Language Testing, 12(2), 217–237.
O’Loughlin, K. (1997). The comparability of direct and semi-direct speaking tests: A case study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–231.
Shohamy, E. (1994). The validity of direct versus semi-direct oral tests. Language Testing, 11(2), 99–123.
Stenstrom, A. B. (1994). An introduction to spoken interaction. London: Longman.
Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk and repair in inter-language. Language Learning, 30(2), 417–431.
Willingham, W. W. & Cole, N. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Xi, X. (2010). How do we go about investigating test fairness? Language Testing, 27(2), 147–170.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Yan Jin and Lin Zhang
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jin, Y., Zhang, L. (2016). The Impact of Test Mode on the Use of Communication Strategies in Paired Discussion. In: Yu, G., Jin, Y. (eds) Assessing Chinese Learners of English. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55397-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44978-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)