Twenty Years of Cambridge English Examinations in China: Investigating Impact from the Test-takers’ Perspectives

  • Xiangdong Gu
  • Nick Saville

Abstract

In the wake of the political reforms which opened up China to the outside world in 1978, and with China’s entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001, the Chinese economy has become increasingly integrated into the international community. In keeping up with globalisation more generally around the world, English has become widely accepted in China as a utilitarian tool for international mobility, study purposes and career development. This has been reflected in the way that English language teaching and learning has been introduced into compulsory education in China. In 2001, the Chinese government established a national policy whereby children start learning a foreign language (mainly English) from Grade Three in primary school (at age nine), instead of from Grade Seven in junior middle school as before. In line with these social, political and educational changes, English language education in China has also become internationalised. Along with the restoration of the National Matriculation Test (commonly referred to as Gaokao, in which English is a compulsory subject, with equal status to Chinese and Mathematics since 1983) in 1977 after a ten-year suspension, and the implementation of the National College English Test for students of non-English majors (CET) in 1987, an increasing number of internationally recognised English tests have been introduced into China.

Keywords

English Proficiency English Language Learning Test Preparation English Learning Language Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson, J. and Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback, Language Testing, 13(3), 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson, J. and Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist?, Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, S. (1995). Washback or washout? The relationship between examination reform and curriculum innovation. In Nunan, D., Berry, V. and Berry, R. (eds.) Bringing about change in language education (pp. 67–81). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, S., Fullilove, J. and Wong, Y. (2002). Targeting washback: A case-study, System, 30(2), 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachman, L. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use, Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachman, L. and Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing, Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrows, C. (2004). Washback in classroom-based assessment: A study of the washback effect in the Australian adult migrant English program. In Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and Curtis, A. (ed.) Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 113–128). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Cambridge ESOL (2011a). Cambridge English: Key for Schools. Handbook for Teachers, http://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/digitalAssets/117394_Cambridge_English_KeyKET_for_Schools_Handbook.pdf Cambridge ESOL (2011b) Cambridge English: Preliminary for Schools. Handbook for Teachers, http://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/digitalAssets/117385_ Preliminary_for_Schools_Handbook.pdf
  10. Cambridge ESOL (2011c) Cambridge English making an impact. Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL.Google Scholar
  11. Cambridge ESOL (2012) Cambridge English: Business Vantage Certificate Handbook for Teachers, http://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/digitalAssets/1 18035_ Cambridge_English_Business BEC Handbook.pdf
  12. Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T. and McNamara, T. (1999). A dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Graddol, D. (2013). Profiling English in China — The Pearl River Delta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gu, X. (2007). Positive or negative? — An empirical study of CET washback Chongqing: Chongqing University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gu, X. (2011). A longitudinal study of the CET washback, research report to the National Foundation of Philosophy and Social Science of China.Google Scholar
  18. Gu, X. and Saville, N. (2012). Impact of Cambridge English: Key for Schools and Preliminary for Schools — Parents’ perspectives in China, Research Notes, 50, 48–56.Google Scholar
  19. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns, Language Testing, 14(3), 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkey, R. (2006) Impact theory and practice: Studies of the IELTS test and Progetto Lingue 2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hawkey, R. (2009) A study of the Cambridge Proficiency in English (CPE) exam washback on textbooks in the context of Cambridge ESOL exam validation. In Taylor, L. and Weir, C. (ed.) Language testing matters: Investigating the wider social and educational impact of assessment — Proceedings of the ALTE Cambridge Conference, April 2008. (pp. 326–343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayes, B. and Read, J. (2004) IELTS test preparation on New Zealand: Preparing students for the IELTS Academic Module. In Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and Curtis, A. (eds.) Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods (pp.97-111). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Hughes, A. (1989) Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kunnan, A. (2004) Test fairness. In Milanovic, M. and Weir, C. (eds.) European language testing in a global context (pp. 27–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, X. and Gu, X (2013) A review of empirical washback studies worldwide over the past two decades, Foreign Language Assessment and Teaching, 1, 4–17.Google Scholar
  26. Messick, S. (1989) Validity. In Linn, R. (ed.) Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Messick, S. (1996) Validity and washback in language testing, Language Testing, 13(3), 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milanovic, M. and Saville, N. (1996) Considering the impact of Cambridge EFL examinations, internal report. Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL.Google Scholar
  29. Papp, S. and Nicholson, G. (2011). Vocabulary acquisition in children and Cambridge ESOL’s wordlist for tests for young learners aged 9–14, Research Notes, 46, 13–22.Google Scholar
  30. Qi, L (2004). The intended washback effect of the National Matriculation English Test in China: Intentions and reality. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
  31. Qi, L. (2007). Examining the intended and actual washback of the proofreading subtest in the National Matriculation English Test, Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 27(10), 43–46.Google Scholar
  32. Saif, S. (2006) Aiming for positive washback: A case study of international teaching assistants, Language Testing, 23(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saville, N. (2009) Developing a model for investigating the impact of language assessments within educational contexts by a public examination provider, unpublished PhD thesis. Luton: University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar
  34. Saville, N. (2010) Developing a model for investigating the impact of language assessment, Research Notes, 42, 2–8.Google Scholar
  35. Shih, C. (2007) A new washback model of students’ learning, The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des languesvivantes, 64(1), 135–162. Shih, C. (2009). How tests change teaching: A model for reference, English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(2), 188–206.Google Scholar
  36. Shohamy, E. (1992). Beyond proficiency testing: A diagnostic feedback testing model for assessing foreign language learning, The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shohamy, E. (1993). The power of tests: The impact of language tests on teaching and learning. NFLC Occasional Papers. Washington, DC: The National Foreign Language Center.Google Scholar
  38. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective of the uses of language tests. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  39. Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S. and Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time, Language Testing, 13 (3), 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tang, X. (2005). A study of the backwash effect of language testing, Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 7, 55–59.Google Scholar
  41. Tsagari, D. (2009). Revisiting the concept of test washback: Investigating FCE in Greek language schools, Research Notes, 35, 5–10.Google Scholar
  42. Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In Clapham, C. and Corson, D. (ed.) Language testing and assessment (pp.291-302). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Wall, D. (2005). The Impact of high-stakes examination on classroom teaching: A case study using insights from testing and innovation theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wall, D. and Alderson, J. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study, Language Testing, 10(1), 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research, Language Testing, 13(3), 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watanabe, Y. (2004). Teacher factors mediating washback. In Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and Curtis, A. (eds.) Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 129–146). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  47. Weir, C. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Yan, Q., Gu, X. and Khalifa, H. (2014). Impact of Cambridge English: Key for Schools on young learners’ English learning: Voices from students and parents in Beijing, China, Research Notes, 58, 44–50.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, K. and Yin, S. (2012). Theory and evidence of female graduates’ job search: A study based on data from 63 universities, Chinese Journal of Population Science, 32(1), 94–101, 112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Xiangdong Gu and Nick Saville 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiangdong Gu
  • Nick Saville

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations