Abstract
Language teachers often express concern about the gap between the language their students are taught and the language they need to participate in real communication outside of the classroom. There have been many attempts to bridge this gap, and one possible solution is the implementation of a task-based approach or task-based learning and teaching (henceforth, TBLT) (Ellis 2003; Nunan 2004; Samuda and Bygate 2008; Van den Branden 2006). This approach utilises tasks as the central unit for planning and language instruction (Richards & Rodgers 2001). TBLT is based on the premise that language is a dynamic resource for creating meaning and that the learning process involves cognitive processing, affective factors, and social interaction (Nunan 2004). Therefore, this approach emphasises the efficacy of language knowledge that is naturally learnt through meaningful language use in informal contexts and from the provision of rich input and opportunities for learners to promote meaningful communication and interaction (Beglar & Hunt 2002; Brown 2000; Ellis 2003; Kumaravadivelu 1994; Samuda & Bygate 2008).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, D. (1989). Language Testing: A Critical Survey and Practical Guide. London: Edward Arnold.
Barduhn, S. (1997). Teaching thinking. The Newsletter of the IATEFL Teacher Trainer Group, 20 (Summer), 4–7.
Bennett, S., Harper, B., & Hedberg, J. (2001). Designing Real-Life Cases to Support Authentic Design Activities: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. December 9–12, 2001. Melmourn.
Borg, M. (2001). Teacher’s Beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186–187.
Beglar, D. & Hunt, A. (2002). Implementing Task-based Language Teaching. In: Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (eds) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breen, M. (1987) Contemporary Paradigm in Syllabus Design. Language Teaching, 20(3), 157–174.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York; Longman.
Bygate, M. (1999) Task as Context for Framing, Reframing and Unframing of Language, System, 27(1), 33–48.
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (eds) (2001). Researching Pedagogic Tasks, Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Harlow: Longman.
Darasawang, P. (2015 in press). Materials Design for TBLT in Thailand: Balancing Process and Content. In: Thomas, M. & Reinders, H. (eds) TBLT in Asia: Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions. London: Bloomsbury.
Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a Flexible Environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 255–272.
Egbert, J. (2003). A Study of Flow Theory in the Foreign Language Classroom. Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 499–518.
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based Research and Language Pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193–220.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (ed.) (2005). Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fulcher, G. (2000). The ‘Communicative’ Legacy in Language Testing. System, 28, 483–497.
Iemjinda, M. (2003). Task-Based Learning and Curriculum Innovation in a Thai EFL Context (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Tasmania, Australia. Retrieved from http://eprints.utas.edu.au/15794/.
Johnson, K. E. (1998). Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krahnke, K. (1987). Approaches to Syllabus Design for Foreign Language Teaching. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Postmethod Condition: (E)merging Strategies for Second/Foreign Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27–48.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leaver, B. L., & Willis, J. R. (eds). (2004). Task-based Instruction in Foreign Language Education: Practices and Programs. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27–56.
Long, M. & Norris J. (2009). Task-based Teaching and Assessment. In: Kris, V. den B., Martin, B, & John, M. N. (eds) Task-Based Language Teaching. Amsterdam. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
McDonough, K. (2007). Teachers’ and Learners’ Reactions to a Task-Based EFL Course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Office of the National Education Commission (1999). National Education Act of 1999. Retrieved from Office of National Education Commission Website: http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Thailand/Thailand_Education_Act_1999.pdf
Pegrum, M. A. (2000). The Outside World as an Extension of the EFL/ESL Classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(8), retrieved fromhttp://iteslj.org/.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (2000). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in Second Language Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based Instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286.
Skehan, P. (2002). A Non-l Role for Tasks. ELT Journal, 56(3), 289–295.
Van den Branden, K. ed. (2006). Task-based Language Education: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watson Todd, R. (2001). Designing a Task-Based Curriculum: Task-Based Learning and Curriculum Innovation. Bangkok, Thailand, King Mongkut’s University of Technology: Thonburi.
Watson Todd, R. (2006). Continuing Change after the Innovation. System, 34, 1–34.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Wareesiri Singhasiri and Kitcha Thepsiri
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singhasiri, W., Thepsiri, K. (2015). Teachers’ Beliefs about Task-Based Language Teaching for Science and Engineering Students. In: Darasawang, P., Reinders, H. (eds) Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449757_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449757_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68646-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44975-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)