Abstract
The Australian government places great emphasis on the East Asia Summit (EAS) as the key regional grouping in the Asia-Pacific region. It celebrates Australia’s role as a “founding member” of the EAS, which was established in Kuala Lumpur in 2005. The EAS has become increasingly prominent in the region, and Australian foreign ministry officials publicly state that it is the regional institution of the highest priority. Why does Australia put so much emphasis on the EAS? And what are the implications for Australia’s relations with ASEAN? This chapter explores Australia’s emphasis on the EAS and the implications this has for Australia’s role in the broader regional architecture,1 and its relations with individual ASEAN states. Australia’s prioritization of the EAS is partly due to the membership of particular states (particularly China and the United States), which are strategically significant and important trading partners. Australian officials refer to the “security agenda” and potential for confidence-building measures in the EAS. However, the chapter argues that while Australia should certainly remain engaged with the EAS, it must be careful not to neglect relations with ASEAN states—its closest neighbors, which provide important opportunities for closer economic and strategic cooperation. In particular, indications that Australia may want the EAS to be more independent of ASEAN might not bode well for Australia-ASEAN relations. The Australian government should also remain cognizant of the limits to the EAS given the tensions and rivalry among particular members.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Malik (2006) “The East Asia Summit,” Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 60, no. 2, 208.
K. Rudd (2008) “Full Text of Kevin Rudd’s Speech to the Asia Society Australasia,” Australian, June 5.
G. Rodan (2012) “Progress and Limits in Regional Cooperation: Australia and Southeast Asia,” in J. Cotton and J. Ravenhill (eds) Middle Power Dreaming: Australia in World Affairs 2006–2010 (South Melbourne: Oxford), pp. 169–70.
A. O’Neil (2012) “Regional, Alliance and Global Priorities of the RuddGillard Governments,” in Cotton and Ravenhill (eds.) Middle Power Dreaming, p. 277.
D. M. Jones and M. L. R. Smith (2007) “Making Process, Not Progress: ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian Regional Order,” International Security, vol. 32, no. 1, 148–84.
D. K. Emmerson (2012) “Is Indonesia Rising? It Depends,” in A. Reid (ed.) Indonesia Rising: The Repositioning of Indonesia’s Third Giant (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies), p. 59.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Sally Percival Wood and Baogang He
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poole, A. (2014). The East Asia Summit: Navigating ASEAN Multilateralism. In: Wood, S.P., He, B. (eds) The Australia-ASEAN Dialogue. Asia Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449146_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449146_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49664-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44914-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)