Abstract
On 1 January 2012, a “milestone” of international financial regulation was passed when a precursor to Basel 3, Basel 2.5, presumably came into force. While the development of Basel 2.5 (and Basel 3) is the product of the realisation that Basel 2 could not have dealt adequately with the global financial crisis, nothing much has changed in the sense that most of the criticism of Basel 2 can be directed at Basel 2.5. It is a complex and tedious set of capital-based regulations that overlook critical issues such as leverage, liquidity, the separation of investment and commercial banking, and the problem of TBTF. The treatment of leverage and liquidity was left for Basel 3, which is scheduled to be implemented in 2019, as if these were trivial matters that can wait. Worst of all is that Basel 2.5 maintains the procedure whereby regulatory capital is calculated on the basis of risk-weighted assets, where weights are determined primarily by the credit rating agencies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Imad A. Moosa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moosa, I.A. (2015). Bad Regulation: Basel 2.5 and Basel 3. In: Good Regulation, Bad Regulation. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137447104_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137447104_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68593-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44710-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)