Skip to main content

The Role of Home Governments in Outward Foreign Direct Investment

  • Chapter
Institutional Impacts on Firm Internationalization

Abstract

This chapter pays particular attention to the significance of outward FDI institutional development concerning the role of the home institutions and the home government as a key institution in the context of China and Russia. The chapter’s insights are expressed in the form of propositions, an analytical framework and a model derived from existing perspectives and empirical data. First, a review of the scale of outward FDI from China and Russia and the relevance of the home government policy to the creation of institutional systems supporting outward FDI is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aggarwal, R. and Agmon, T. (1990). The International Success of Developing Country Firms: Role of Government-Directed Comparative Advantage, Management International Review, 30: 163–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aykut, D. and Ratha, D. (2004). South-South FDI Flows: How Big Are They? Transnational Corporations, 13: 149–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R., Greif, R., Levy, M., Rosenthal, J.-L. and Weingast, B. (1998). Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations, Organization Studies, 20: 777–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. and Brewer, T. (1994). International Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions, Academy of Management Review, 19: 119–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., Clegg, J., Cross, A., Liu, X., Voss, H. and Zheng, P. (2007). The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment, Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J., Clegg, L.J., Cross, A.R. and Voss, H. (2008). Emerging Countries’ Policies on Outward FDI — Lessons from Advanced Countries, Presented at the “Five-Diamond International Conference Cycle: Thinking Outward: Global Players from Emerging Markets”, 28–29 April 2008, Columbia University, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, K.G. (1999). Outward Foreign Direct Investment: A Novel Dimension of China’s Integration into the Regional and Global Economy, China Quarterly, 160: 856–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. and Rodrigues, S.B (2005). The Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical Extension? Management and Organization Review, 1: 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Lu, Y. and Tsai, T. (2007). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Building an Environmental Protection System for the People’s Republic of China, Organization Studies, 28: 1013–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K. (2010). Outward FDI from China and Its Policy Context. Columbia FDI Profiles. New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment, 18 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In Zucker, L. (Ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environments. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1991). Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: US Art Museums, 1920–1940. In Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 267–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. (2007). Multinational Companies from Emerging Economies: Composition, Conceptualization and Direction in the Global Economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J.D. and Velamuri, S.R. (2009). States, Power, Legitimacy and Maintaining Institutional Control: The Battle for Private Sector Telecommunication Services in Zimbabwe, Organization Studies, 30: 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (2004). Institutions: Theory and History. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C.R. (2002). Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields, Academy of Management Journal, 45: 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the US, Chemical Industry, Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. (1999). Institutions, Institutional Effects and Institutionalism. In Powel, W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 143–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karavaev, V. (2002). Government Regulation of Foreign Investment: Russian Realities and World Experience, Problems of Theory and Practice of Management, 10: 16–27 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (2008.) Internationalization of Indian Enterprises: Patterns, Strategies, Ownership Advantages and Implications, Asian Economic Policy Review, 3: 242–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Hardy, C. and Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration: The Emergence of Proto-Institutions, Academy of Management Journal, 45: 281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. and Scully, M. (2008). The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields, Organization Studies, 28: 971–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (1955). The Theory of Economic Growth. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Xue, Q. and Han, B. (2010). How Emerging Market Governments Promote Outward FDI: Experience from China, Journal of World Business, 45: 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinova, S., Child, J. and Marinov, M. (2012). Institutional Field for Outward Foreign Direct Investment: A Theoretical Extension? Advance in International Management, Institutional Theory in International Business and Management, 25: 233–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008). China’s Outward Direct Investment, OECD Investment Policy Reviews: China2008, 65–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization, Organization Studies, 13: 563–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panibratov, A. and Kalotay, K. (2009). Russian OFDI and Its Policy Context, Columbia FDI Profiles, New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment, No. 1, October 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. (2000). Business Strategies in Transition Economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. (2002). Towards an Institution-Based View of Business Strategy, Asia-Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 251–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prihodko, S., Pahomov, A. and Volovik, N. (2008). Russian Foreign Direct Investment: Major Trends and Consequences for the National Economy. Moscow: Institute of the Economy in Transition (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2002). The Changing World of Chinese Enterprise: An Institutional Perspective. In Tsui, A.S. and Lau, C.M. (Eds.) The Management of Enterprises in the People’s Republic of China. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 59–78.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. and Christensen, S. (1995). Conclusion: Crafting a Wider Lens. In W.R. Scott and Christensen, S. (Eds.) The Institutional Construction of Organizations: International and Longitudinal Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 302–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (1992). Social Institutions and Economic Performance: Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Economies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (Eds.) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. In Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (Eds.) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press: 1–32.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. (1995). Accounting for Acquisition Waves: Evidence from the U.S. Publishing Industry. In Scott, W.R. and Ghristensen, S. (Eds.) The Institutional Construction of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 199–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, H., Buckley, P. and Cross, A. (2009). An Assessment of the Effects of Institutional Change on Chinese Outward Direct Foreign Investment Activity. In Alon, I., Chang, J., Fetscherin, M., Lattemann, C. and McIntyre, J. (Eds.) China Rules: Globalization and Political Transformation. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 135–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Investment Report (WIR) (2006). FDI from Developing Countries and Transition Economies: Implications for Development. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Investment Report (WIR) (2010). Investing in a Low-Carbon Economy. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. and Peng, M. (2005). Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom, Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Svetla Marinova, John Child and Marin Marinov

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marinova, S., Child, J., Marinov, M. (2015). The Role of Home Governments in Outward Foreign Direct Investment. In: Marinova, S. (eds) Institutional Impacts on Firm Internationalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446350_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics