Abstract
Physical evidence for magical practice in modern England survives in the form of amulets, of which over 1,700 remain in museum collections. Amulets can be defined as portable charms to guard against negative influences, or to encourage positive ones — a fossil to keep away lightning, a hag stone to guard against witchcraft, a mole’s foot to fight cramp (Photograph 11.A), or simply a silver charm against bad luck. They are sometimes worn as jewellery, but can be kept in the pocket, sewn into clothing, concealed or displayed in homes or in barns, on agricultural animals or on vehicles. This chapter looks at the physical form of the amulets that survive and the documentation that accompanies them. It considers what these can tell us about the people who made and used amulets, the powers they invested in these objects, and what the material evidence can reveal about the problems these people faced and the issues that were foremost in their minds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Jonathan Roper (ed.), English Verbal Charms (Helsinki, 2005).
Sir James George Frazer, The Golden Bough (London, 1890).
Sir Edward Burnett Tylor, Primitive Culture (London, 1891).
Frederick Thomas Elworthy, The Evil Eye (London, 1895).
Nicholas Saunders, Trench Art: Materialities and Memories of War (London, 2003).
Jude Hill, ‘The Story of the Amulet: Locating the Enchantment of Collections’, Journal of Material Culture, 12(1) (2007), 65–87.
Christopher Duffin, ‘Herbert Toms (1874–1940), Witch Stones and Porosphaera Beads’, Folklore, 122 (2011), 84–101.
Christopher Duffin and Jane Davidson, ‘Geology and the Dark Side’, Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 122 (2011), 7–15.
Kenneth McNamara, The Star-Crossed Stone (Chicago, 2011).
Oliver Douglas, The Material Culture of Folklore (Oxford, 2010).
Richard Dorson, The British Folklorists: A History (London, 1968).
Chris Wingfield, ‘A Case Re-opened: The Science and Folklore of a “Witch’s Ladder”’, Journal of Material Culture, 15(3) (2010), 302–322.
Hugh Cheape, ‘Charms against Witchcraft: Magic and Mischief in Museum Collections’, in Goodare, J., Martin, L. and Miller, J. (eds), Witchcraft and Belief in Early Modern Scotland (Basingstoke, 2008), 228.
Chris Gosden and Frances Larson, Knowing Things (Oxford, 2007), 199.
Mark Jones (ed.) Fake? The Art of Deception (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1990), 84.
Ralph Merrifield, The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic (London, 1987), 135.
Jonathan Roper (ed.), English Verbal Charms (Helsinki, 2005), 189.
Laura Peers and Alison Brown, Museums and Source Communities (London, 2003).
Owen Davies, Cunning Folk (London, 2003), 83.
Steve Patterson, Cecil Williamson’s Book of Witchcraft (London, 2014), 198–199.
Bronislaw Malinowski, ‘Magic, Science and Religion’ in Magic, Science and Religion, and Other Essays (Glencoe, 1948), 70.
Keith Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic (London, 1971), 57.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Tabitha Cadbury
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cadbury, T. (2015). Amulets: The Material Evidence. In: Hutton, R. (eds) Physical Evidence for Ritual Acts, Sorcery and Witchcraft in Christian Britain. Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444820_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444820_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56884-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44482-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)