Skip to main content
  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

Within many projects, there are strategic benefits that may defy financial quantification. Nevertheless, as any firm will be naturally concerned with building and sustaining its competitive strategic position and advantage, such benefits should be identified and evaluated and included in the appraisal process. What is proposed is the strategic index (SI) model which aims at doing just that — identifying and evaluating key strategic benefits. The SI highlights the strategic benefits looked for in each capital investment opportunity and then goes on to assess their ‘worth’ within each project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Narasimhan, R., 1983, An analytical approach to supplier selection. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19 (4), Winter, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Simons, T., 1995, Top management team consensus, heterogeneity, and debate as contingent predictors of company performance: The complementarity of group structure and process. In: Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Vancouver, WA, 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Madu, C. N., Kuei, C-H., and Madu, A. N., 1991, Setting priorities for the IT industry in Taiwan — A Delphi study. Long Range Planning, 24 (5), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hambrick, D. C., 1981, Strategic awareness within top management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See Wheelwright, S. C., and Hayes, R. H., 1985, Competing through manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 63 (1), 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Frank Lefley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lefley, F. (2015). The FAP Model — The Strategic Index (SI). In: The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443526_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics