Abstract
As companies become more and more reliant on ICT systems to aid good decision-making, a regular review of their information technology requirements is inevitable. The appraisal of such investments is not, however, without its problems.1 Arguments have been raised that the traditional methods of financial appraisal are inadequate because ICT investments differ, in many respects, from non-ICT capital investments.2 The literature shows that some companies now tend to use a greater number of appraisal techniques than in the past, but there is no consensus on the actual combination.3 The literature also shows that individual appraisal models on their own are now inappropriate and a more hybrid approach is required, one that includes both economic and strategic dimensions of choice.4 As a result of the perceived failure of some of the traditional methods of capital investment appraisal, managers sometimes base their decisions on ‘acts of faith’ or, as some researchers report, use less sophisticated financial models to evaluate what must be regarded as sophisticated IT projects.5 It is argued that the positivist approach to the evaluation of IT projects that places excessive emphasis on accounting aspects may no longer be relevant and that a more ‘interpretive’ approach should be adopted.6 Sophisticated investments, such as investments in ICT, may require a more sophisticated approach in their appraisal, with the use of a larger diversity of financial, risk, and strategic assessment models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Doherty, N. F., Ashurst, C., and Peppard, J., 2012, Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: Findings from three case studies. Journal of Information Technology, 27 (1), 1–16;
Gunasekaran, A., Love, P. E. D., Rahimi, F., and Miele, R., 2001, A model for investment justification in information technology projects. International Journal of Information Management, 21 (5), 349–364;
Apostolopoulos, T. K., and Pramataris, K. C., 1997, Information technology investment evaluation: Investments in telecommunication infrastructure. International Journal of Information Management, 17 (4), 287–296.
Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259,
see also Chapter 11; Peacock, E., and Tanniru, M., 2005, Activity-based justification of IT investments. Information and Management, 42 (3), 415–424.
Ballantine, J., and Stray, S., 1998, Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process. Journal of Information Technology, 13 (1), 3–14.
Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259;
Heemstra, F. J., and Kusters, R. J., 2004, Defining ICT proposals. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17 (4), 258–268;
Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337;
Small, M. H., and Chen, I. J., 1997, Economic and strategic justification of AMT: Inferences from industrial practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 49 (1), 65–75.
Graham, J. R., and Harvey, C. R., 2001, The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2–3), 187–243.
Serafeimidis, V., and Smithson, S., 2000, Information systems evaluation in practice: A case study of organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 15 (2), 93–105.
Oxford Economics, 2011, Capturing the ICT dividend: Using technology to drive productivity and growth in the EU, September, White Paper.
Gunasekaran, A., Love, P. E. D., Rahimi, F., and Miele, R., 2001, A model for investment justification in information technology projects. International Journal of Information Management, 21 (5), 349–364.
Oxford Economics, 2011, The new digital economy: How it will transform business. June, p. 29, www.oxfordeconomics.com/free/pdfs/the_new_digital_economy.pdf.
Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1999, Moving IS evaluation forward: Learning themes and research issues. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8 (2), 189–207.
This chapter is taken from the following publication, Lefley, F., 2013, The appraisal of ICT and non-ICT capital projects: A study of the current practices of large UK organisations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6 (3), 505–533.
Ward, J., Taylor, P., and Bond, P., 1996, Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: An empirical study of current practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 4 (4), 214–225.
Ballantine, J. A., and Stray, S., 1999, Information systems and other capital investments: Evaluation practices compared. Logistics Information Management, 12 (1–2), 78–93.
Ho, S. S. M., and Pike, R. H., 1998, Organizational characteristics influencing the use of risk analysis in strategic capital investments. Engineering Economist, 43 (3), 247–268;
Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.
Cotton, W. D. J., and Schinski, M., 1999, Justifying capital expenditures in new technology: A survey. Engineering Economist, 44 (4), 362–374.
Ward, J., Taylor, P., and Bond, P., 1996, Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: An empirical study of current practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 4 (4), 214–225.
Ballantine, J. A., and Stray, S., 1999, Information systems and other capital investments: Evaluation practices compared. Logistics Information Management, 12 (1–2), 78–93.
Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.
Hvolby, H., and Trienekens, J., 2002, Supply chain planning opportunities for small and medium sized companies. Computers in Industry, 49 (1), 3–8.
Heemstra, F. J., and Kusters, R. J., 2004, Defining ICT proposals. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17 (4), 258–268.
Heemstra, F. J., and Kusters, R. J., 2004, Defining ICT proposals. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17 (4), 258–268.
Ballantine, J. A., Galliers, R. D., and Stray, S. J. 1996, Information systems/technology evaluation practices: Evidence from UK organisations. Journal of Information Technology, 11 (2), 129–141.
Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.
Ballantine, J. A., Galliers, R. D., and Stray, S. J. 1996, Information systems/technology evaluation practices: Evidence from UK organisations. Journal of Information Technology, 11 (2), 129–141.
Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259.
Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.
Ward, J., Taylor, P., and Bond, P., 1996, Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: An empirical study of current practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 4 (4), 214–225.
See, for example, Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259.
Hyde, W. D., 1986, How small groups can solve problems and reduce costs. Industrial Engineering, 18 (12), 42–49.
Hambrick, D. C., 1994, Top management groups: A conceptual and reconsideration of the team label. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 171–213.
Lefley, F., 2006, Can a project champion bias project selection and, if so, how can we avoid it? Management Research News, 29 (4), 174–183.
Lefley, F., 2006, Can a project champion bias project selection and, if so, how can we avoid it? Management Research News, 29 (4), 174–183.
Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.
Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.
Small, M. H., and Chen, I. J., 1997, Economic and strategic justification of AMT: Inferences from industrial practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 49 (1), 65–75.
Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.
Lefley, F., 1996, The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44 (3), 207–224.
See, for example, Gregory, A., Rutterford, J., and Zaman, M., 1999, The Cost of Capital in the UK: A Comparison of the Perceptions of Industry and the City (London: CIMA).
Evans, D. A., and Forbes, S. M., 1993, Decision making and display methods: The case of prescription and practice in capital budgeting. Engineering Economist, 39 (1), 87–92.
Collier, P., and Gregory, A., 1995, Investment appraisal in service industries: A field study analysis of the UK hotel sector. Management Accounting Research, 6 (1), 33–57.
Ballantine, J., and Stray, S., 1998, Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process. Journal of Information Technology, 13 (1), 3–14.
Ballantine, J., and Stray, S., 1998, Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process. Journal of Information Technology, 13 (1), 3–14.
See, for example, Davis, E. W., and Pointon, J., 1994, Finance and the Firm. Second Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Gregory, A., Rutterford, J., and Zaman, M., 1999, The Cost of Capital in the UK: A Comparison of the Perceptions of Industry and the City. (CIMA: London).
See, for example, Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337.
Lefley, F., 1997, Approaches to risk and uncertainty in the appraisal of new technology capital projects. International Journal of Production Economics, 53 (1), 21–33.
Hillier, F. S., 1963, The derivation of probabilistic information for the evaluation of risky investments. Management Science, 9 (3), 443–457.
Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.
Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337.
Lefley, F., 1996, The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44 (3), 207–224.
Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.
Trahan, E. A., and Gitman, L. J., 1995, Bridging the theory-practice gap in corporate finance: A survey of chief financial officers. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 35 (1), 73–87.
Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337.
Mohanty, R. P., and Deshmukh, S. G., 1998, Advanced manufacturing technology selection: A strategic model for learning and evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 55 (3), 295–307.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Frank Lefley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lefley, F. (2015). The Appraisal of ICT and Non-ICT Projects: A Study of Practices of Large UK Organisations. In: The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443526_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443526_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68454-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44352-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)