Skip to main content

The Appraisal of ICT and Non-ICT Projects: A Study of Practices of Large UK Organisations

  • Chapter
The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

As companies become more and more reliant on ICT systems to aid good decision-making, a regular review of their information technology requirements is inevitable. The appraisal of such investments is not, however, without its problems.1 Arguments have been raised that the traditional methods of financial appraisal are inadequate because ICT investments differ, in many respects, from non-ICT capital investments.2 The literature shows that some companies now tend to use a greater number of appraisal techniques than in the past, but there is no consensus on the actual combination.3 The literature also shows that individual appraisal models on their own are now inappropriate and a more hybrid approach is required, one that includes both economic and strategic dimensions of choice.4 As a result of the perceived failure of some of the traditional methods of capital investment appraisal, managers sometimes base their decisions on ‘acts of faith’ or, as some researchers report, use less sophisticated financial models to evaluate what must be regarded as sophisticated IT projects.5 It is argued that the positivist approach to the evaluation of IT projects that places excessive emphasis on accounting aspects may no longer be relevant and that a more ‘interpretive’ approach should be adopted.6 Sophisticated investments, such as investments in ICT, may require a more sophisticated approach in their appraisal, with the use of a larger diversity of financial, risk, and strategic assessment models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Doherty, N. F., Ashurst, C., and Peppard, J., 2012, Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: Findings from three case studies. Journal of Information Technology, 27 (1), 1–16;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunasekaran, A., Love, P. E. D., Rahimi, F., and Miele, R., 2001, A model for investment justification in information technology projects. International Journal of Information Management, 21 (5), 349–364;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apostolopoulos, T. K., and Pramataris, K. C., 1997, Information technology investment evaluation: Investments in telecommunication infrastructure. International Journal of Information Management, 17 (4), 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. see also Chapter 11; Peacock, E., and Tanniru, M., 2005, Activity-based justification of IT investments. Information and Management, 42 (3), 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ballantine, J., and Stray, S., 1998, Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process. Journal of Information Technology, 13 (1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heemstra, F. J., and Kusters, R. J., 2004, Defining ICT proposals. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17 (4), 258–268;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Small, M. H., and Chen, I. J., 1997, Economic and strategic justification of AMT: Inferences from industrial practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 49 (1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Graham, J. R., and Harvey, C. R., 2001, The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2–3), 187–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Serafeimidis, V., and Smithson, S., 2000, Information systems evaluation in practice: A case study of organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 15 (2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oxford Economics, 2011, Capturing the ICT dividend: Using technology to drive productivity and growth in the EU, September, White Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gunasekaran, A., Love, P. E. D., Rahimi, F., and Miele, R., 2001, A model for investment justification in information technology projects. International Journal of Information Management, 21 (5), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oxford Economics, 2011, The new digital economy: How it will transform business. June, p. 29, www.oxfordeconomics.com/free/pdfs/the_new_digital_economy.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1999, Moving IS evaluation forward: Learning themes and research issues. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8 (2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. This chapter is taken from the following publication, Lefley, F., 2013, The appraisal of ICT and non-ICT capital projects: A study of the current practices of large UK organisations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6 (3), 505–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ward, J., Taylor, P., and Bond, P., 1996, Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: An empirical study of current practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 4 (4), 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ballantine, J. A., and Stray, S., 1999, Information systems and other capital investments: Evaluation practices compared. Logistics Information Management, 12 (1–2), 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ho, S. S. M., and Pike, R. H., 1998, Organizational characteristics influencing the use of risk analysis in strategic capital investments. Engineering Economist, 43 (3), 247–268;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cotton, W. D. J., and Schinski, M., 1999, Justifying capital expenditures in new technology: A survey. Engineering Economist, 44 (4), 362–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ward, J., Taylor, P., and Bond, P., 1996, Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: An empirical study of current practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 4 (4), 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ballantine, J. A., and Stray, S., 1999, Information systems and other capital investments: Evaluation practices compared. Logistics Information Management, 12 (1–2), 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hvolby, H., and Trienekens, J., 2002, Supply chain planning opportunities for small and medium sized companies. Computers in Industry, 49 (1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heemstra, F. J., and Kusters, R. J., 2004, Defining ICT proposals. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17 (4), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heemstra, F. J., and Kusters, R. J., 2004, Defining ICT proposals. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17 (4), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ballantine, J. A., Galliers, R. D., and Stray, S. J. 1996, Information systems/technology evaluation practices: Evidence from UK organisations. Journal of Information Technology, 11 (2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ballantine, J. A., Galliers, R. D., and Stray, S. J. 1996, Information systems/technology evaluation practices: Evidence from UK organisations. Journal of Information Technology, 11 (2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ward, J., Taylor, P., and Bond, P., 1996, Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: An empirical study of current practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 4 (4), 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. See, for example, Lefley, F., 2008, Research in applying the financial appraisal profile FAP model to an information communication technology project within a professional association. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1 (2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hyde, W. D., 1986, How small groups can solve problems and reduce costs. Industrial Engineering, 18 (12), 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hambrick, D. C., 1994, Top management groups: A conceptual and reconsideration of the team label. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 171–213.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lefley, F., 2006, Can a project champion bias project selection and, if so, how can we avoid it? Management Research News, 29 (4), 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lefley, F., 2006, Can a project champion bias project selection and, if so, how can we avoid it? Management Research News, 29 (4), 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D., 1992, Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7 (2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Small, M. H., and Chen, I. J., 1997, Economic and strategic justification of AMT: Inferences from industrial practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 49 (1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lefley, F., 1996, The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44 (3), 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. See, for example, Gregory, A., Rutterford, J., and Zaman, M., 1999, The Cost of Capital in the UK: A Comparison of the Perceptions of Industry and the City (London: CIMA).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Evans, D. A., and Forbes, S. M., 1993, Decision making and display methods: The case of prescription and practice in capital budgeting. Engineering Economist, 39 (1), 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Collier, P., and Gregory, A., 1995, Investment appraisal in service industries: A field study analysis of the UK hotel sector. Management Accounting Research, 6 (1), 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ballantine, J., and Stray, S., 1998, Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process. Journal of Information Technology, 13 (1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ballantine, J., and Stray, S., 1998, Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process. Journal of Information Technology, 13 (1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. See, for example, Davis, E. W., and Pointon, J., 1994, Finance and the Firm. Second Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gregory, A., Rutterford, J., and Zaman, M., 1999, The Cost of Capital in the UK: A Comparison of the Perceptions of Industry and the City. (CIMA: London).

    Google Scholar 

  52. See, for example, Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lefley, F., 1997, Approaches to risk and uncertainty in the appraisal of new technology capital projects. International Journal of Production Economics, 53 (1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hillier, F. S., 1963, The derivation of probabilistic information for the evaluation of risky investments. Management Science, 9 (3), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lefley, F., 1996, The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44 (3), 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lefley, F., and Sarkis, J., 1997, Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (2), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Trahan, E. A., and Gitman, L. J., 1995, Bridging the theory-practice gap in corporate finance: A survey of chief financial officers. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 35 (1), 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Anandarajan, A., and Wen, H. J., 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment. Management Decision, 37 (4), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mohanty, R. P., and Deshmukh, S. G., 1998, Advanced manufacturing technology selection: A strategic model for learning and evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 55 (3), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Frank Lefley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lefley, F. (2015). The Appraisal of ICT and Non-ICT Projects: A Study of Practices of Large UK Organisations. In: The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443526_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics