Advertisement

Governed by Gossip: The Personal Letters and Public Purpose of Philip Ludwell in Early-Eighteenth-Century Virginia

Chapter

Abstract

In March 1703, Philip Ludwell wrote to his father in England about the unseemly behavior of Virginia’s governor, Francis Nicholson. Ludwell’s correspondence revealed his concern over Nicholson’s allegedly foul tongue and slanders as well as Nicholson’s aggressive pursuit of Lucy Burwell, to whom Ludwell was related. Because of this relationship, the governor’s treatment of Lucy Burwell escalated into a battle between the two men and, through Ludwell’s family connections, became part of the contest between the governor and his Council of State. A powerful body politic, the Council was the upper house of the legislature as well as the general court. The Crown appointed its members, including Philip Ludwell in 1702. From his councilor’s rank, Ludwell the scribe became narrator, witness, and judge of Nicholson’s actions and policies. Thus, Ludwell’s letters to his father cast him as protagonist and
Figure 3.1

Map of Virginia and Maryland in 1670 by Augustine Herrman, published in 1673.

protector of young Lucy from the determined governor. Despite the familial character of Ludwell’s interactions with Nicholson on Lucy’s behalf, their private relationship was conducted on a public stage and orchestrated according to a score of gentility. This genteel code guided social ritual and defined comportment; how effectively it was mastered reinforced the political position of Virginians within eighteenth-century society.2

Keywords

State Paper Good Wife Political Alignment Social Ritual Parish Church 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Markman Ellis, Coffee-House: A Cultural History (London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 2004)Google Scholar
  2. Brian Cowan, The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
  3. Edward A. Chappell, “Resurrecting the Coffeehouse,” Colonial Williamsburg Interpreter 29.3 (2008/2009): 7–16Google Scholar
  4. Mark Kostro, Andrew Edwards, and Meredith Poole, “Charlton’s Coffeehouse Archaeology,” Colonial Williamsburg Interpreter 29.3 (2008/2009): 1–6Google Scholar
  5. Jessica Kross, “Mansions, Men, Women, and the Creation of Multiple Publics in Eighteenth-Century British North America,” Journal of Social History 33.2 (Winter 1999): 385–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robert D. Spector, Political Controversy: A Study in Eighteenth-Century Propaganda (new York: Greenwood Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    Kate Loveman, Reading Fictions, 1660–1740: Deception in English Literary and Political Culture (aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2008), 31–32Google Scholar
  8. Ann C. Dean, The Talk of the Town: Figurative Publics in Eighteenth-Century Britain (lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2007), 11–24.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    Hannah Harrison Ludwell is silent actor in this narrative, but for insight into women of her social class and her rights under femme covert status, see Amanda Vickery, The Gentleman’s Daughter: Women’s Lives in Georgian England (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
  10. Linda L. Sturtz, Within Her Power: Propertied Women in Colonial Virginia (new York: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar
  11. Cynthia A. Kierner, Beyond the Household: Women’s Place in the Early South, 1700–1835 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
  12. Marylynn Salmon, Women and the Law of Property in Early America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986)Google Scholar
  13. John Styles and Amanda Vickery, Gender, Taste and Material Culture in Britain and North America, 1700–1830 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  14. 8.
    For a summary of Nicholson’s land policies and the alienation of the councillors those policies caused, see David A. Williams, Political Alignments in Colonial Virginia Politics, 1698–1750 (new York: Garland Publishing, 1989), 4–21.Google Scholar
  15. For contextual understandings, see Dell Upton, “New Views of the Virginia Landscape,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 96 A (October 1988): 403–470Google Scholar
  16. Rhys Isaac, The Transformation of Virginia, 1740–1790 (new York: W.W. Norton, 1988)Google Scholar
  17. Camille Wells, “The Planter’s Prospect: Houses, Outbuildings, and Rural Landscapes in Eighteenth-Century Virginia,” Winterthur Portfolio 28.1 (Spring 1993): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 11.
    Warren M. Billings, A Little Parliament: The Virginia General Assembly in the Seventeenth Century (Richmond: Library of Virginia, for the Jamestown 2007/Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation, 2004), 49–62, 65–68, 78–85.Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    Warren M. Billings, “Berkeley and Effingham: Who Cares?” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 97 (1989): 39–46Google Scholar
  20. Warren M. Billings (ed.) Papers of Francis Howard, Baron Howard of Effingham, 1643–1695 (Richmond: Virginia State Library and Archives, 1989).Google Scholar
  21. 13.
    Billings, A Little Parliament, 82–85; Virginia B. Price, “Constructing to Command: Rivalries between Green Spring and the Governor’s Palace, 1677–1722,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 113 (2005): 26.Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    George Humphrey Yetter, Williamsburg Before and After: The Rebirth of Virginia’s Colonial Capital (williamsburg: Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, 1988 seventh printing, 1996, 17Google Scholar
  23. William P. Palmer (ed.) Calendar of Virginia State Papers, I: 1652–1781 (1875; reprint, New York: Kraus Reprint Corporation, 1968), 73.Google Scholar
  24. 18.
    Kathleen M. Brown, Good Wives, Nasty Wenches and Anxious Patriarchs: Gender, Race, and Power in Colonial Virginia (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996), 247–250.Google Scholar
  25. 19.
    Bourdieu elucidates this social theory in his Distinction. On the study of material culture, see, for example, Jules David Prown, “Mind in Matter: An Introduction to Material Culture Theory and Method,” in Material Life in America, 1600–1860, ed. Robert Blair St. George (Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, 1988), 17–38Google Scholar
  26. George Kubler, The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1962)Google Scholar
  27. Henry Glassie, “Meaningful Things and Appropriate Myths: The Artifacts’s Place in American Studies,” in Material Life in America, 63–92Google Scholar
  28. James Deetz, In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life (new York: Doubleday, 1977)Google Scholar
  29. Ian M. G. Quimby (ed.) Material Culture and the Study of American Life (new York: W.W. Norton, 1978)Google Scholar
  30. Thomas J. Schlereth (comp.) Material Culture Studies in America (Nashville, TN: American Association for State and Local History, 1982).Google Scholar
  31. Regarding cultural performances, see Robert Blair St. George, Conversing by Signs: Poetics of Implication in Colonial New England Culture (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 1–14.Google Scholar
  32. 21.
    Niko Besnier, Gossip and the Everyday Production of Politics (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009), 1–7, 191–194.Google Scholar
  33. 23.
    Dell Upton, Holy Things and Profane: Anglican Parish Churches in Colonial Virginia (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997), 203–209.Google Scholar
  34. 26.
    Henry Hartwell, James Blair, and Edward Chilton, The Present State of Virginia and the College, edited and introduction by Hunter Dickinson Farish (williamsburg: Colonial Williamsburg, 1940), xiii–lxxiii, 21–39, 68–94.Google Scholar
  35. 32.
    Cary Carson, “The Consumer Revolution in Colonial British America: Why Demand?” in Of Consuming Interests: The Style of Life in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Cary Carson, Ronald Hoffman, and Peter J. Albert (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994), 483–697Google Scholar
  36. Richard L. Bushman, The Refinement of America: Persons, Houses, Cities (new York: Vintage Books, 1992).Google Scholar
  37. 33.
    Edmund Berkeley’s appointment to the Council of State in 1714 was one the Colony’s (Lieutenant) Governor Alexander Spotswood derided as a Virginia coffeehouse pick due to the intercession of Micajah Perry. Spotswood to Nicolas Blakiston, December 1, 1714, Spotswood Letters III: 79, as quoted in Williams, Political Alignments in Colonial Virginia Politics, 276n64; Alison G. Olson, “The Virginia Merchants of London: A Study in Eighteenth-Century Interest-Group Politics,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 40.3 (July 1983): 363–388.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    Brown, Good Wives, Nasty Wenches, 254–255Google Scholar
  39. Fairfax Downey, “The Governor Goes A-Wooing,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 55.1 (1947): 6–19Google Scholar
  40. Polly Cary Legg, “The Governor’s ‘Extacy of Trouble’,” William and Mary Quarterly, 2nd series, 22.1 (1942): 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 42.
    Bernard S. Capp, When Gossips Meet: Women, Family, and Neighborhood in Early Modern England (new York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kathleen A. Feeley and Jennifer Frost 2014

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations