Abstract
Contemporary peacekeeping operations and missions have increasingly focused on providing sustainable peace and have thus gained in complexity. At the same time, they have developed from predominantly military to joint military and civilian activities, with the civilian ones representing the larger part. This has resulted in an increase in the number of participating actors, with various governmental, non-governmental and intergovernmental organisations taking on important roles not only in the humanitarian field but also in social and economic fields and the reconstruction of state institutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aliu F. (2012) Report on Kosovo (Priština: BIRN).
Bajrami S. (2011) ‘The Rule of Law in Kosovo: Mission Impossible?’, Balkan Insight.
Bebler A. (2012) ‘The Kosovo Case’ in ‘Frozen Conflicts’ in Europe: Searching for Pragmatic Solutions and Promoting Reconciliation (Ljubljana: EASS and FES), 7–8.
Bentinck M. and de Bruijne K. (2008) ‘The European Union and Peace Support Operations: Gaining Credibility in the Field of International Security’ in Bloemendaal R. and de Bruijne K. (eds) Peace Support Operations: The Past and the Future (Groningen: CESS).
Biserko S. (2012) ‘Accepting Reality or Maintaining Status Quo’ in ‘Frozen Conflicts’ in Europe: Searching for Pragmatic Solutions and Promoting Reconciliation (Ljubljana: EASS and FES), 11–14.
Capersen N. and Herrberg A. (2012) ‘EU as a Mediating Actor’ in ‘Frozen Conflicts’ in Europe: Searching for Pragmatic Solutions and Promoting Reconciliation (Ljubljana: EASS and FES), 39–41.
Committee for Civilian Aspects of Crisis Management (2000) Council Decision O. J. (L 127) 1, 22 May, http://www.consilium.europa.eu, date accessed 17 June 2009.
Deda I. (2012) ‘The Problem of Northern Kosovo’ in ‘Frozen Conflicts’ in Europe: Searching for Pragmatic Solutions and Promoting Reconciliation (Ljubljana: EASS and FES), 14–16.
EULEX Kosovo (2012) Meeting at the Parliamentary Committee of Budgetary Control, 25 May.
Europa (2012) Civilian Headline Goal 2008, http://europa.eu/legislation_ summaries/foreign_and_security_policy/conflict_prevention/133239_En. htm, date accessed 12 December 2012.
Europa (2013a) Crisis Management, http://www.eeas.europa.eu/cfsp/crisis_ management/index_En.htm, date accessed 15 January 2013.
Europa (2013b) European Rule of Law Mission for Kosovo, http://www.eulex-Kosovo.eu, date accessed 13 January 2013.
Europa (2013c) Overview of the Missions and Operations of the European Union, http://www.ue.eu.int, date accessed 18 January 2013.
European Court of Auditors (2012) European Union Assistance to Kosovo Related to the Rule of Law. Special Report, 18.
European Union External Action (2012) CSDP. EULEX Kosovo, EU Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, October.
European Union External Action (2013) Speech by High Representative Catherine Ashton on the Latest Developments in the Common Foreign, Security and Defence Policy. Strasbourg, 23 October.
Ferati V. (2012) Critical Discourse Analysis (De-)Constructing EULEX Discourse (Prishtinë: Kosovar Center for Security Studies).
Gallucci G. M. (2012a) ‘Kosovo — Now and in the Future’ in ‘Frozen Conflicts’ in Europe: Searching for Pragmatic Solutions and Promoting Reconciliation (Ljubljana: EASS and FES), 9–11.
Gallucci G. M. (2012b) ‘Kosovo — If EULEX Leaves, Then What?’, Trans Conflict, 19 January.
International Court of Justice (2010) Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo. Advisory Opinion. 22 July.
Janjić D. (2012) ‘The Case of Northern Kosovo and Mitrovica’ in ‘Frozen Conflicts’ in Europe: Searching for Pragmatic Solutions and Promoting Reconciliation (Ljubljana: EASS and FES), 16–17.
Kandel P. (2012) ‘“Frozen” Regional Conflicts in Europe’ in ‘Frozen Conflicts’ in Europe: Searching for Pragmatic Solutions and Promoting Reconciliation (Ljubljana: EASS and FES), 5–6.
Karadaku L. (2012) ‘Kosovo Approves EULEX Extension’, Southeast European Times, 10 September.
Kosovar Center for Security Studies et al. (2010) Progress Report. Made in Kosova, Prishtina.
Malešič M. (2011) ‘Civilian Crisis Management in the EU — Structural and Functional Aspects’, Journal of International Peacekeeping, 15, 1–26.
Nowak A. (2006) ‘Civilian Crisis Management: The EU Way’, Chaillot Paper, 90 (Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies).
Pipenbaher B. (2008) Usposabljanje civilnih strokovnjakov za CIMIC (Training of Civilian Experts for CIMIC), Slovenska vojska, 16, 18.
Radio Free Europe (2012) European Auditors Slam EULEX Kosovo Mission, 30 October.
Schroeder U. C. (2007) Governance of EU Crisis Management. Evaluating the EU’s Crisis Mission in the Balkans (Brussels: CEPS).
Spernbauer M. (2010) ‘EULEX Kosovo — Mandate, Structure, and Implementation: Essential Clarifications for an Unprecedented EU Mission’, Working Papers, 5 (The Hague: CLEER).
Spiegel Online International (2012) http://www.spiegel.de/international/, 7 November 2012.
TV Slovenija (2013) Interview with Samuel Žbogar, 10 February 2013.
Wittkowsky A. and Kasch H. (2012) ‘Test Case Kosovo: A Preliminary Stocktaking of European Conflict Management’, Policy Briefing, Center for International Peace Operations.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Marjan Malešič
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malešič, M. (2015). EULEX Kosovo: A Test of the EU’s Civilian Crisis Management. In: Galantino, M.G., Freire, M.R. (eds) Managing Crises, Making Peace. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442253_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442253_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49500-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44225-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)