Skip to main content

Seclusive Space: Crisis Confinement and Behavior Modification in Canadian Forensic Psychiatric Settings

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

This essay offers a theoretical reflection emerging from the a u thors’ qualitative empirical studies examining ethical practice and mental health care in Canadian forensic psychiatric settings. Forensic psychiatry is a specialized area of psychiatry LUI!Ling the fields of mental health, law, and criminology. Forensic psychiatry implies the use of (para)medical psychiatric knowledge or ‘opinion’ concerning patients who have legal issues. According to the American Academy of PsychiaLry and the Law, forensic psychiatry involves ‘’civil, criminal, correctional, regulatory or legislative matters, and ... specialized clinical consultations in areas such as risk assessment or employmenL’ (AAPL 2005). While Lhe AAPL’s eLhics guidelines acknowledge the ‘special hazards’ and ‘potential for unintended bias’ in the practice of forensic psychiatry—particularly in the courtroom — the Academy urges its members Lo ‘minimize such hazards’ and to ‘strive’ to reach an ‘objective opinion’ (AAPL 2005). Our research focuses on the clinical use of forensic psychiatry within correctional facilities, where it is applied to a cap Live population of inmaLes who have been diagnosed with a mental disorder linked, in some respects, to their incarceration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AAPL 2005, Ethics guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Available from: <http://www.aapl.org/ethics.htra>. [10 January 2015].

  • Butler, J 2004, Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. Verso, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, j 2005, Giving an account of oneself, Fordham University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castei, F, Castel, R & Loveli, A 1982, The psychiatric society, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, CS 2014, Red skin, white masks: rejecting the colonial politics of recognition, Universi ly of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A 2002, ‘From the convict lease system to the super-max prison’, Tn States of confinement policing, detention, and prisons, ed J James, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 60–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M 1986, How institutions think, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F 1963, The wretched of the earth, Grove Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F 1967, Black skin, white masks, Grove Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D 2012, Humanitarian reason: a moral history of the present, Univcrsiiy of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M 2008a, Psychiatric power: lectures at the College de France, 1973 1974, Read or, IslewYork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M 2008b, The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the College de France, 1978 1979, Picador, Iew York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M 1984 [1967], ‘Of other spaces: heterotopias [Desespaces autres]’ in Archi-tecture, Mouvement, Continuité 5, M Foucault, pp. 46–9. Available from: <http://foucault.in.fo/documents,’lieterotopia/foucault.heterotopia.eTi.html>. [1.0 January 2015].

  • Goffman, E 1961, Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, L 2013, Solitary confinement: social death and its afterlives, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grassian, S 2006, ‘Psychiatric effects of solitary confinement’, Washington University journal of Law & Policy, vol. 22, pp. 325–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D, Kennedy, SI. Si Perron, A 2004, ‘The menially ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of ihe use of seclusion from ihe patient’s perspective’. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 559–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D & Murray, SJ 2011, ‘Civilizing the barbarian: a critical analysis of behaviour modification programmes in forensic psychiatry settings’, journal of Nur sing Management, vol. 19, pp. 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J 2003, ‘Bio-medical topoi-the dominance of space, the recalcitrance of place, and the making of persons’, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 56, no. 11, pp.2343–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J 2012, Heidegger and the thinking of place: explorations in the topology of being, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, T, Vermeer C & Windsor, C 2000, ‘Patients’ perceptions of seclusion: a qualitative investigation’, journal of A foanced Nursing, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 370–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M 1962, Phenomenology of perception, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzi, JM 2010, The protest psychosis: how schizophrenia became a black disease, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir-Cochrarte, EC 1995, ‘An exploration of ethical issues associated with the seclusion of psychiatric patients’, Collegian: journal of the Royal College of Nursing, Australia, 2(3), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir-Cochrane, EC & Holmes, CA 2001, ‘Legal and ethical aspects of seclusion: an Australia!! perspective’, journal of Psychiatric & Menial Health Nursing, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 501–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Sj 2012, ‘Phenomenology, ethics, and the crisis of the lived-body’, Nursing Philosophy, vol. 13, pp. 289–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, SJ & Holmes, D 2013, ‘Toward, a critical ethical reflexMty: phenomenology and language in Maurice Merleau-Ponty’, Bioethics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 341–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, SJ fir Holmes, D 2014, ‘Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) and the ethics of body and place: critical methodological reflections’, Human Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Correctional Investigator 2013, Segregation in Canadian federal corrections: a prison ombudsman’s perspective, Government of Canada. Available from: <http://www.oci-bec.gc.ca/cnt/comiri/prcsentations/prcscnJ:aJ:ions201.30322-23-eng.aspx>. [10 January 2015].

  • Office of the Correctional investigator 2014, A case study of diversity in corrections: the Black inmate experience in federal penitentiaries final report/ Government of Canada. Available from: <http://www.oci-bec.gc.ca/ciit/rpt/oth-aut/oth-aut 20131126-eng.aspx>. [10 January 2015].

  • OTTQ-CMQ 2011, Rapport d’enquête sur la qualité des soins en santé mental au CSSS de St-Jérome, Ord re des infirmières et i nfirmiers du Quebec and Collège des médeci ns do Québec. Avail able fro m:http://www.oiiq.org/sites/default/files/uploads/pdf/salle_de_presse/rapport-enquete-saint-jerome-20110616-VCA-oiiq-VF.pdf>. [10 January 2015].

  • Oshinsky. D 1996, ‘Worse than slavery’:’ Parchman Farm and the ordeal of Jim Crow justice/ Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Safety Canada 2014, Corrections and conditional release statistical overview. Government of Canada. Available from: http://www.pubHcsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ rsrcs/pblctns /crrcins-cndtn]-rls-201.3/indcx-eng.aspx>. [10 January 2015].

  • Roihman, DJ 1975, ‘A historical overview: behavior modi ileal ion in iota! institutions’’, Hastings Center Report vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, S 2009, Supermax: controlling risk through solitary confinement/ Willart, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security 2010, Mental health and drug and alcohol addiction in the federal correctional system: report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security Government of Canada. Available from: <http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/committee/403/secu/reports/rp4864852/securp04/securp04-e.pdf>. [10 January 2015].

  • Szasz, T2014, ‘Varieties of psychiatric criticism’, in Power and the psychiatric apparatus, eds D Holmes, JD Jacob, & A Perron, Ashgate Publishing, Farrtham, UK, pp. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxis, JC 2002, ‘Fthics and praxis: alternative strategies to physical restraint and seclusion in a psychiatric setting’’, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 157–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Stuart J. Murray and Dave Holmes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murray, S.J., Holmes, D. (2015). Seclusive Space: Crisis Confinement and Behavior Modification in Canadian Forensic Psychiatric Settings. In: Reiter, K., Koenig, A. (eds) Extreme Punishment. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441157_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics