Skip to main content

The US Policy of Rebalance: Japanese and South Korean Perspectives

  • Chapter
Origins and Evolution of the US Rebalance toward Asia

Abstract

In attempting to explain the US policy of rebalance,1 Japanese analysts often begin by referring to Hillary Clinton’s article “America’s Pacific Century,” which appeared in the November 2011 issue of Foreign Policy.2 From the Japanese perspective, several considerations influenced the United States’ adoption of the rebalance policy. Kato Yoichi’s assessment summarizes the prevailing Japanese views well.3 He observes that the Obama administration needed to explain to Congress why the defense budget should not be reduced despite the end of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Also, the United States needed a new strategic objective as American military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan were drawing down, and connecting to Asia’s dynamic growth promised to serve both US economic and strategic interests. It was widely believed in Japan that the War on Terror conducted by the Bush administration had led to the reduction of US engagement in the Pacific in diplomatic and national security terms, weakening US leadership in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  • American Forces Press Service, “Hagel Describes Role of Partnerships in Asia Pacific Rebalance,” April 2, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asan Institute for Policy Studies, “Asan 2013 Nuclear Forum, Proceedings,” February 19–20, 2013, pp. 48–55; 60–65; 82–89. Available at http://en.asaninst.org/asannuclear-forum-2013-proceedings/ (accessed on May 15, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Daljung, “Hegemonic Rivalry and Territorial Disputes in Northeast Asia,” presented at the Sixth International Conference, Research foundation on East Asia Community, October 30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, Chaesung, Paper in Compendium of Papers (in Korean) presented at the Sixth International Conference, Foundation for Research on East Asia Community, October 30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “U.S. Strategic rebalancing to Asia,” Asia Policy, no. 15, January 2013, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Kyung Young, “hanbando sinrai purosesoowa dongbooka pyungwha hyumryuk gusanei sunsoonwhan junryak,” Compendium of papers (in Korean), presented at the Sixth International Conference, Research foundation on East Asia Community, October 30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, Hillary, 2011, “America’s Pacific Century,” Foreign Policy, October 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Foreign Relations, “What Happened to the Asia Pivot in 2013,” Expert Roundup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, Patrick, “Japan’s New Defense Strategy.” Available at http://warontherocks.com/2013 (accessed on May 15, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, James, “Conflict with China: What It Would Look Like, How to Avoid It,” The Diplomat, August 14, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, James, David C. Gompert, David A. Shlapak, and Andrew Scobell, “Conflict with China, Prospects, Consequences, and Strategies for Deterrence,” Occasional Paper, RAND Arroyo Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Editorial,” Chosun Ilbo, February 10, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, Aaron, A Contest for Supremacy, New York: W.W. Norton, 2001, pp. 245–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedhoff, Karl, “South Korean Views on the U.S. Rebalance to Asia,” Academic Paper Series, Korea Economic Institute of America, May 8, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumiaki Kubo, Akio Takahata, and the Tokyo Foundation Contemporary American Studies Project, eds., Ajia kaiki suru Amerika: Gaiko anzen hosho seisaku no kensho (America’s Rebalancing to Asia: Evaluating the Foreign and National Security Policy of the Obama Administration), Tokyo: NTT Publishing, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompert, David C. and Phillip C. Saunders, The Paradox of Power, Washington DC: NDU Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Matthew, Testimony before the Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs, the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, December 18, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, Hyug Baeg, “The Future of Korea-U.S. Relationship: A Korean Perspective,” Paper presented at International conference on Korea-U.S. Relations in an Age of Globalization co-hosted by Korean Association of International Studies and Presidential Council on Nation Building at George Washington University, September 18, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Ministry of Defense, National Defense Program Guidelines for FY2014 and Beyond, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda, Hideaki, “nichibei boei kyoryokushishinno minaoshinitsuite,” Yachi Shotaro (ed.), Nihonno anzenhoshoto boeiseisaku, Tokyo: Wedge, 2013, pp. 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, Yoichi, “kokusai kankyono henkano nakano nichibei domei,” Kokusai Mondai, 1–2, 2012, pp. 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami, Takashi, “dainiki Obama seikenkano nichibei domei,” Kubo Fumiaki (ed), ajia kaikisuru amerika gaikoanzenhosho seisakuno kensho, NTT Shuppan, Tokyo, 2013, pp. 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Hee Sang, oneulei hanguk ambo, KINSA Academy #11, 2013/12/16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, James, “Budget Driven Defense: Implications of Potential Shifts in U.S. Defense Posture for the Korean Peninsula and the Asia Pacific in the Coming Decade,” Issue Brief, September 24, 2013, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto, Satoshi, “bei ribalansuha takokukande Hokan o,” Sankei Shimbun, March 18, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “beikokuno ajia jushiseisakuto nichibei domei,” Kokusai Mondai, March 2012, pp. 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, Michael E., “Rebalancing the US Military in Asia and the Pacific,” Opinion, June 9, 2013, Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onodera, Itsunori, “News Transcript, Joint Press Conference with Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel,” Department of Defense, April 6, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Jonathan, No Exit, London/New York: Routledge, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Jonathan and Richard Bush III, Memorandum to President on “Korea Crisis Prompts Conflict with China,” January 23, 2014, Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahashi, Ryo, “Japan-US Security Committee Consultative Committee at Tokyo,” AJISS-Commentary, November 21, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scissors, Derk, Testimony before the Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs, the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, December 18, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stares, Paul et al., Managing Instability on China’s Periphery, The Council on Foreign Relations, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaine Michael D. et al., China’s Military & The U. S. Japan Alliance in 2030—Executive Summary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Sugio, Upgrading the Japan-U.S. Defense Guidelines, Project 2049.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “zaisei kinshukukano beigunto ajia taiheiyochiikino yokusi taisei,” Kokusai Anzen Hosho, December 2013, pp. 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis Ashley J. and Travis Tanner (eds), China’s Military Challenge, Strategic Asia 2012–13, Washington DC: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toki, Masako, Japan’s Defense Guidelines, NTI, March 1, 2011. Available at http://www.nti.org/analysis (accessed on May 15, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • US China Economic and Security Review Commission, China’s Active Defense Strategy and Its Regional Impact, Hearing, January 27, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Defense, “Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense,” January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State, “Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee: Toward a More Robust Alliance and Greater Shared Responsibilities,” October 3, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House, “Fact Sheet. The U.S.-Republic of Korea Alliance: Global Partnership,” April 25, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Joint Press Conference with President Obama and Prime Minister Abe of Japan,” April 24, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “U.S. Japan Joint Statement: The United States and Japan: Shaping the Future of the Asia Pacific and Beyond,” April 25, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, Noboru, “A Japanese Perspective on U.S. Rebalancing toward the Asia Pacific Region,” Roundtable: Regional Perspectives on the U.S. Strategic Rebalancing, pp. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Hugo Meijer

Copyright information

© 2015 Hugo Meijer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, Y.C. (2015). The US Policy of Rebalance: Japanese and South Korean Perspectives. In: Meijer, H. (eds) Origins and Evolution of the US Rebalance toward Asia. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137440372_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics