Skip to main content

“Faith, Here’s an Equivocator”: Language, Resistance, and the Limits of Authority in Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Tom Stoppard’s Cahoots Macbeth

  • Chapter
Book cover Shakespeare, Dissent, and the Cold War

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

  • 103 Accesses

Abstract

At the beginning of Act 2, scene 3 of Macbeth the drunken Porter comes on stage after a loud knocking at the gate of Macbeth’s castle. Macduff and Lennox have just arrived to awaken King Duncan, who—they will soon discover—has been treacherously murdered in his bed. Coming before this gruesome discovery the Porter’s speech provides brief comic relief from the unbearable tension of the preceding scene. But there is also a dark side to this speech: the Porter imagines himself as “the porter of hell gate” from the medieval mystery play The Harrowing of Hell:

PORTER: Here’s a knocking indeed! If a man were a porter of Hell Gate, he should have old turning the key. (Knock.) Knock, knock, knock! Who’s there, I’ th’ name of Belzebub? Here’s a farmer, that hang’d himself on th’ expectation of plenty. Come in time! Have napkins enow about you, here you’ll sweat for’t. (Knock.) Knock, knock! Who’s there in th’ other devil’s name? Faith, here’s an equivocator that could swear in both the scales against either scale, who committed treason enough for God’s sake, yet could not equivocate to heaven. Oh, come in, equivocator. (3.2.1–11)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a reading of Macbeth which presents Malcolm as the true hero of the play and the play as an endorsement of his equivocation, see Richard C. McCoy, “Spectacle and Equivocation in Macbeth,” in Spectacle and Public Performance in the Late Middle Ages and the Renaissance, ed. Robert E. Stillman (Boston: Brill, 2006), 145–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For Macbeth’s “all too literalistic” imagination, see Donald Foster, “Macbeth’s War on Time,” English Literary Renaissance 16 (1986), 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See Gary Wills. Jesuits and Witches: Shakespeare’s Macbeth (Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Henry N. Paul, The Royal Play of Macbeth: When, Why, and How it was Written by Shakespeare (New York: Macmillan, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Michael Hawkings, “History, Politics, and Macbeth,” in Focus on Macbeth, ed. John Russell Brown (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alan Sinfield, “Macbeth: History, Ideology, and Intellectuals,” in Faultlines: Cultural Materialism and the Politics of Dissident Reading (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Nick Aitchison, Macbeth: Man and Myth (Stroud: Sutton, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted from James Simpson, Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), 153.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. John Bossy, Christianity in the West 1400–1700 (Oxford University Press, 1985), 99.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Southwell, Collected Poems, ed. Peter Davidson and Anne Sweeney (Manchester: Carcanet Press, 2007), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. René Weis, Shakespeare Unbound: Decoding a Hidden Life (New York: Henry Holt, 2007), 353–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a favorable view of Garnet that contradicts the Protestant mythology of the evil Jesuit, see Robert Miola, “Two Jesuit Shadows in Shakespeare: William Weston and Henry Garnet,” in Shakespeare and Religion: Early Modern and Postmodern Perspectives, ed. Ken Jackson and Arthur F. Marotti (University of Notre Dame Press, 2011), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sarah Beckwith, Signifying God: Social Relation and Symbolic Act in the York Corpus Christi Plays (University of Chicago Press, 2001), 137.

    Google Scholar 

  14. James Travers, Gunpowder: The Players behind the Plot (Kew: National Archives, 2005), 110–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jonathan Dollimore, “Dr Faustus (c. 1589–92): Subversion through Transgression,” in Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus (London: W.W. Norton, 2005), 323–32 (326).

    Google Scholar 

  16. On anti-Marian iconoclasm, see Gary Waller, The Virgin Mary in Late Medieval and Early Modern English Literature and Popular Culture (Cambridge University Press, 2011), chapter 1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. For murder and masculinity, see Mary Beth Rose, Gender and Heroism in Early Modern English Literature (University of Chicago Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Franz Kalka, “Before the Law,” in Collected Stories, trans. Willa and Edwin Muir (New York: Everyman’s Library, 1993), 175.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peter C. Herman, “Macbeth: Absolutism, the Ancient Constitution, and the Aporia of Politics,” in The Law in Shakespeare, ed. Constance Jordan and Karen Cunningham (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 208–32 (218).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Václav Havel, Selected Plays 1963–83 (London: Faber and Faber, 1992), 209.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maik Hamburger, “Shakespeare the Politicizer: Two Notable Stagings in East Germany,” in Shakespeare in the Worlds of Communism and Socialism, ed. Irena R. Makaryk and Joseph G. Price (University of Toronto Press, 2006), 205–9 (205–6).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quoted from Jill L. Levenson, “Stoppard’s Shakespeare: Textual Re-visions,” in The Cambridge Companion to Tom Stoppard, ed. Katherine F. Kelly (Cambridge University Press, 2001), 154–70 (163).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. John Bull, “Tom Stoppard and Politics,” in The Cambridge Companion to Tom Stoppard, ed. Katherine F. Kelly (Cambridge University Press, 2001), 136–53 (142).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Orlando Figes, “A Double Game with Stalin,” New York Review of Books LIX/1 (January 12, 2012), 32–34 (33).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ira Nadel, Tom Stoppard: A Life (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Annabel Patterson, “‘All is True’: Negotiating the Past in Henry VIII,” in Elizabethan Theater: Essays in Honor of S. Schoenbaum, ed. R.B. Parker and S.P. Zitner (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1996), 147–66.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tom Stoppard, Rock ‘n’ Roll (New York: Grove Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vaclav Havel, Largo Desolato: A Play in Seven Scenes. English version by Tom Stoppard (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1987), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Ernest Gellner, “The Price of Velvet: On Thomas Masaryk and Václav Havel,” Telos 94 (Winter 1992–93), 183–92 (92).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. See also Alfred Thomas, The Labyrinth of the Word: Truth and Representation in Czech Literature (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1995), chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Alfred Thomas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, A. (2014). “Faith, Here’s an Equivocator”: Language, Resistance, and the Limits of Authority in Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Tom Stoppard’s Cahoots Macbeth . In: Shakespeare, Dissent, and the Cold War. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137438959_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics