Abstract
In dance, unlike music and theatre, there is no universal mode of inscription. Although formal movement-notation systems such as Benesh and Labanotation are occasionally used to record movement, more often choreographers draw upon non-codified, idiosyncratic methods to document their work. Furthermore, the advent of video recording had a substantial impact on the documentation of dance, inspiring a wealth of literature concerning the philosophical and practical questions posed by the method.1 Despite their differences, documentation, through both notation systems and video recording, has tended to focus on movement-based performance outputs. This seems a logical response to dance’s ontological status; after all, it is through performance that we are able to see the work in physical form. Such is the significance of performances that Graham McFee (2011) and David Carr (1987) both claim that it is only through performance, as opposed to through recordings and scores, that we are able to access dance works. However, this chapter introduces an emerging form of dance scoring which is not focused on the documentation of specific movements or performances, but rather is concerned with disseminating choreographic process, and revealing features of the work not present in performance. I consider some of the philosophical repercussions of this method, asking how it impacts on the perception, identity and existence of dance works.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adshead, J., Briginshaw, V., Hodgens, P. and Huxley, M. (1988) Dance Analysis: Theory and Practice. London: Dance Books.
Auslander, P. (1999) Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. London: Routledge.
Barthes, R. (1977) ‘The Death of the Author’, in Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana Press, pp. 142–8.
Birringer, J. (2013) ‘What Score? Pre-choreography and Post-choreography’, International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 9:1, pp. 7–13.
Carr, D. (1987) ‘Thought and Action in the Art of Dance’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 27:4, pp. 345–57.
Conroy R. (2013) ‘The Beat Goes On: Reconsidering Dance Work Identity’,in J. Bunker, A. Pakes and B. Rowell (eds), Thinking Through Dance: The Philosophy of Dance Performance and Practices. Hampshire: Dance Books, pp. 102–26.
Cvejić, B. (2012) ‘Introduction’, in A.T. deKeersmaeker and B. Cvejić, A Choreographer’s Score: Fase, Rosas danst Rosas, Elena’s Aria, Bartok. Belgium: Mercatorfonds, pp. 7–19.
Davies, S. (2001) Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford University Press.
deLahunta, S. (2013) Motion Bank Score Release [Presentation]. D üsselfdorf, Germany.
deLahunta, S. and Zuniga Shaw, N. (2006) ‘Constructing Memories: Creation of the Choreographic Resource’, Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 11:4, pp. 53–62.
Dixon, S. (2007) Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theatre, Dance, Performance Art and Installation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forsythe, W. (1999) Improvisation Technologies: A Tool for the Analytic Dance Eye. Karlsruhe: Centre for Art and Media Technology.
Forsythe, W. (2009) ‘Choreographic Objects’ on Synchronous Objects for One Flat Thing, reproduced, http://synclrronousobjects.osu.edu/assets/obi ects/concept ThreadsAmmation/WilliamForsythe-ChoreographicObjects.pdf [accessed 23 June 2014].
Forsythe, W. and Zuniga Shaw, N. (2009) ‘The Dance’, http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/content.html#/VideoAbstractionTool [accessed 6 March 2015].
Goodman, N. (1976) Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, 2nd edn. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Greco, E., et al. (2004-7) Capturing Intention, http://insidemovementknowledge.net/context/background/capturing-intention/ [accessed 20 December 2013].
Hay, D. (2013) ‘No Time to Fly’ on Motion Bank Using the Sky, http://scores.motionbank.Org/dh/#set/sets [accessed 16 June 2014].
Hutchinson Guest, A. (2000) ‘Is Authenticity to be Had?’, in S. Jordan (ed.), Preservation Politics: Dance Revived, Reconstructed, Remade. London: Dance Books, pp. 65–71.
Lamarque, P. (2010) Work and Object: Explorations in the Metaphysics of Art. Oxford University Press.
Leach, J. (2013) ‘Choreographic Objects: Contemporary Dance, Digital Creations and Prototyping Social Visibility’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 7:4, pp. 458–75, www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17530350.2013.858058 [accessed 1 April 2015].
Margolis, J. (1981) ‘The Autographic Nature of the Dance’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39:4, pp. 420–7.
McFee, G. (1992) Understanding Dance. London: Routledge.
McFee, G. (2011) The Philosophical Aesthetics of Dance: Identity, Performance and Understanding. Hampshire: Dance Books.
Motion Bank (2013) Synchronous Objects for One Flat Thing, reproduced, http://scores.motionbank.org/dh/#set/sets [accessed 16 June 2014].
Motion Bank (2013) Using the Sky, http://scores.motionbank.org/dh/#set/sets [accessed 16 June 2014].
O’Shea, J. (2010) ‘Introduction’, in A. Carter and J. O’Shea (eds), The Routledge Dance Studies Reader, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.
Pakes, A. (2009) ‘Choreography Practical Knowledge and Practice-as-Research’, in J. Butterworth and L. Wildschut (eds), Contemporary Choreography: A Critical Reader. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 10–22.
Pakes, A. (2013) ‘The Plausibility of a Platonist Ontology of Dance’, in J. Bunker, A. Pakes and B. Rowell (eds), Thinking Through Dance: The Philosophy of Dance Performance and Practices. Hampshire: Dance Books, pp. 84–101.
Paxton, S. (2008) Material for the Spine [DVD]. Brussels: Contradanse.
Phelan, P. (1993) Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge.
Rubidge, S. (2000) ‘Identity and the Open Work’, in S. Jordan (ed.), Preservation Politics: Dance Revived, Reconstructed, Remade. London: Dance Books, pp. 205–15.
Van Imschoot, M. (2010) ‘Rests in Pieces: On Scores, Notation and the Trace in Dance’, in What’s the Score? Publication on Scores and Notation in Dance, www.sarma.be/oralsite/pages/What%27s_the_Score_Publication/ [accessed 16 June 2014].
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Hetty Blades
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blades, H. (2015). Inscribing Work and Process: The Ontological Implications of Virtual Scoring Practices for Dance. In: Causey, M., Meehan, E., O’Dwyer, N. (eds) The Performing Subject in the Space of Technology. Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137438164_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137438164_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68364-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43816-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)