Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

The previous chapters have concentrated on the European Commission’s work with expert groups in the process of developing research and innovation policy. They have shown that viewing the Commission’s work with expert groups as a purely technocratic endeavor risks overlooking the existing diversity in the dynamics of European policy making. In actual fact, variation exists bothw regarding the extent to which expert groups are involved in the EU policy process and regarding the way in which the Commission uses its expert groups. In accordance with this book’s theoretical proposition, the ways in which the expert groups are used by the Commission — to acquire expertise, support, or consensual positions — does indeed depend on the respective issue context and the type of expert group consulted. In addition, whether Commission services chose to consult expert groups in the first place seemed to vary according to their consultation traditions and habits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Julia Metz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Metz, J. (2015). A Cross-Sectoral View. In: The European Commission, Expert Groups, and the Policy Process. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437235_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics