Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The German Konzentrationslager and the Debates about the Annihilation of the Herero, 1905–1908

  • Chapter
Restorative Justice, Humanitarian Rhetorics, and Public Memories of Colonial Camp Cultures

Part of the book series: Rhetoric, Politics and Society series ((RPS))

  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

As I have discussed since Chapter 1, debates still rage about how best to remember and record the colonial histories of the nation of Namibia, and there are those who contend that at one time German colonizers engaged in an intentional rassenkampf (race war) that almost wiped out large segments of the indigenous Herero, Nama, Damara, and San populations of German South-West Africa.2 Although it may be possible that many more people died in “Weyler’s” Spanish camps, and British negligence may have contributed to the extremely high mortality and morbidity rates in the Boer and African camps, the German camps have sometimes been singled out for attention because their labor camps have been viewed as punitive facilities that kept alive “annihilationist” policies. In other words, other colonial camp systems were deployed to separate colonial rebels from the populations that supported them, but more than a few scholars today argue that the German camps were uniquely problematic in that they were set up to deter the Herero and Nama and break the back of indigenous resistance to colonial rule. Tens of thousands of Africans in German South-West Africa literally worked themselves to death or died from exposure, and some researchers go as far as to call this the “Kaiser’s Holocaust,” because the colonial administrators and their civilian and military superiors in Berlin knew about horrific conditions in the camps.3

… the death rattle of the dying and the shrieks of the mad … they echo in the sublime stillness of infinity.1

Unnamed German soldier

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jon M. Bridgman, The Revolt of the Hereros (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), 131.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grossen Generalstabs, Die Kämofe der deutschen Truppen in Südwestafrika (Berlin: Ernst Siegfried Mittler und Sohn, 1907).

    Google Scholar 

  3. From a historical vantage point, some of the earliest accusations of horrific brutality came from British and South African writers who had a vested interested in circulating propaganda that justified South Africa’s invasion of German South-West Africa in 1915. See, for example, the famous “Blue Book.” Union of South Africa, Report on the Natives of South-West Africa and Their Treatment by Germany (London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1918).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamed Adhikari, “‘Streams of Blood and Streams of Money’: New Perspectives on the Annihilation of the Herero and Nama Peoples of Namibia, 1904–1908,” Kronos 34, no. 1 (2008): 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helmut Bley, South West Africa under German Rule, trans. Hugh Ridley (London: Heinemann, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horst Drechsler, “Let Us Die Fighting”: The Struggle of the Herero and Nama against German Imperialism (1184–1915), (London: Zed Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Olusoga and Casper Erichsen, The Kaiser’s Holocaust: Germany’s Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of Nazism (London: Faber & Faber, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Werner Hillebrecht, “‘Certain Uncertainties,’ or Venturing Progressively into Colonial Apologetics?” Journal of Namibian Studies 1 (2007): 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For an analysis of the politics behind the appropriation of the land from the Herero, see Jan-Bart Gewald, Herero Heroes: A Socio-Political History of the Herero of Namibia 1890–1923 (Oxford: James Currey, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brigette Lau, “Uncertain Certainties,” Mibagus 2 (1989): 4–5, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tilman Dedering, “The German-Herero War of 1904: Revisionism of Genocide or Imaginary Historiography? Journal of Southern African Studies 19 (1993): 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. It is estimated that 10, 000 Nama may have died between 1904 and 1908. On the numbers of lives lost during this period, see Drechsler, “Let Us Die Fighting” 214; Bley, South-West Africa, 151–152. For general overviews of various facets of the Herero and Nama struggles against German colonizers in German South West Africa between 1900 and 1915, see Jeremy Sarkin, Germany’s Genocide of the Herero: Kaiser Wilhelm II, His General, His Settlers, His Soldiers, (Rochester, NY: James Currey, 2011). One interesting academic strand of argumentation highlights the parallels that may be found between Wilhelmine annihilationist practices and Nazi exterminationist rhetorics.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jürgen Zimmer, Von Windhuk nach Auschwitz? Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Kolonialismus und Holocaust (Berlin: Lit. Verlag, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamin Madley, “From Africa to Auschwitz: How German South West Africa Incubated Ideas and Methods Adopted and Developed by the Nazis in Eastern Europe,” European Historical Quarterly 35 (2005): 432, 441.

    Google Scholar 

  15. George Steinmetz, “The Colonial State as a Social Field: Ethnographic Capital and Native Policy in the German Overseas Empire before 1914,” American Sociological Review 73 (2004): 589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jürgen Zimmerer, “The Birth of the Ostland out of the Spirit of Colonialism: A Postcolonial Perspective on the Nazi Policy of Conquest and Extermination,” Patterns of Prejudice 39 (2005): 197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Note the claims that are advanced by many descendants of German settlers, who often contend that their ancestors paid indigenous populations for their land at the same time that the colonizers brought religion, agriculture, and economic prosperity to this part of Africa. Some vocal Namibians and other colonial critics respond to these claims by arguing that this settler mythmaking involves a blending of nationalistic apologetics and colonial amnesia. Tilman Dedering, “The German-Herero War of 1904: Revisionism of Genocide or Imaginary Historiography?” Journal of Southern African Studies 19, no. 1 (March 1993): 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. For a recent critique of some of this “smoking gun” rhetoric, see Henning Melber, “Germany’s Genocide of the Herero: Kaiser Wilhelm II, His General, His Soldiers.” German Studies Review 36 (2013): 200–201.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For a fascinating study of how various generations of the von Trotha family have dealt with the words, deeds, and legacies that were left behind by those who remembered Lothar von Trotha, see Britta Schilling, “Imperial Heirlooms: The Private Memory of Colonialism in Germany,” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 41 (2013): 663–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coleen Michelle Thornley, “Heaps of Sand”: Genocide in German Southwest Africa and Press Silence in 1904 (Ph.D. diss., Rutgers University 2013), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  21. During the first weeks of the uprising that began in January 1904, the Herero killed some 123 German settlers. See Jürgen Zimmerer, “Colonial Genocide: The Herero and Nama War (1904–1908) in German South West Africa and Its Significance,” in The Historiography of Genocide, ed. Dan Stone (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 326.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benjamin Madley, “Patterns of Frontier Genocide 1803–1910: The Aboriginal Tasmanians, the Yuk of California, and the Herero of Namibia,” Journal of Genocide Research 6 (2004): 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peter Scheuler, Die “Eingeborenen” Deutsch-Südwestafrikas: Ihr Bild in deutschen Kolonialzeitschriften von 1884 bis 1918 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 1998), 153.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dan Stone, “White Men with Low Moral Standards? German Anthropology and the Herero Genocide,” Patterns of Prejudice 35 (2001): 40.

    Google Scholar 

  26. For an analysis of how German settlers and others worried about the impact of “race-mixing,” see Matthew P. Fitzpatrick, “The Threat of’Woolly-Haired Grandchildren,”: Race, the Colonial Family and German Nationalism,” The History of the Family 14 (2009): 357.

    Google Scholar 

  27. For one of the most famous examples of popular representations of this idea, see Hans Grimm, Volk Ohne Raum (Munich: Albert Langen, 1926). Hundreds of thousands of copies of this book were sold in Germany before the advent of the World War II.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See, for example, von Missionär F. Irle, Die Herero: Ein Beitrag zur Landes-, Volks-, und Missions-Kunde (Gütersloh: Bortelsmann, 1906).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Andrew Zimmerman, Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Helmut Walser Smith, “Review: Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany,” Central European History 37 (2004): 158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. For commentary on some of the ideological origins of these strands, see Matthew Fitzpatrick, Liberal Imperialism in Germany: Expansionism and Nationalism 1848--1884 (New York: Berghahn, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Many other indigenous communities living in a host of colonies probably had to make agonizing choices about this type of hybridization. See Homi Bhabha, Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. For a fascinating summary of some of the convergence of key social, political, and military motivations on the part of many participants in these rebellions in German South West Africa between 1885 and 1904, see Jon Swan, “The Final Solution in South West Africa,” MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History 3, no. 4 (summer 1991): 36–55.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Isabel V. Hull, “Military Culture and the Production of ‘Final Solutions’ in the Colonies: The Example of Wehelminian Germany,” in The Specter of Genocide: Mass Murder in Historical Perspective, eds. Robert Gellately and Ben Kiernan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 146.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hillebrecht, “‘Certain Uncertainties,’” 76. See Ludwig von Estorff, Wanderungen und Kämpe in Südafrika 1894–1910 (Wiesbade: Selbstverlag, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  36. See, for example, Kurd Schwabe, Der Krieg in Deutsch-Südwestafrika (Berlin: C. A. Weller Verlag, 1907).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Casper W. Erichsen, “The Angel of Death Has Descended Violently among Them”: Concentration Camps and Prisoners-of-War in Namibia, 1904–1908 (Leiden: African Studies Center, 2005), 84.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Von Trotha also added to these instructions when he gave this order: This proclamation is to be read to the troops at roll-call, with the addition that the unit that catches a captain will also receive the appropriate reward, and that the shooting at women and children is to be understood as shooting above their heads, so as to force them to run [away]. I assume absolutely that this proclamation will result in taking no more male prisoners, but will not degenerate into atrocities against women and children. The latter will run away if one shoots at them a couple of times. The troops will remain conscious of the good reputation of the German soldier. Isabell Hull, Absolute Destruction: Military Culture and the Practices of War in Imperial Germany (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tilman Dedering, “A Certain Rigorous Treatment of All Parts of the Nations: The Annihilation of the Herero in German South West Africa, 1904,” in The Massacre in History, eds. M. Levene and P. Roberts (New York: Berhan Books, 1999), 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A typical British critique of German suppression efforts appears in Evans Lewin and M. Montgomery-Campbell, “How Germany Treats the Native,” The Quarterly Review 455 (1918): 372–396.

    Google Scholar 

  41. George Steinmetz, “From Native Policy to Exterminationalism: German South West Africa, 1904, in Comparative Perspective,” 2005, 37, Theory and Research in Comparative Social Analysis, Department of Sociology, UCLA, UC Los Angeles, http://scholarship.org/uc/item/11z1k021.

    Google Scholar 

  42. General von Trotha, cited in Gerhard Pool, Samual Maherero (Windhoek, Namibia: Gamsberg Macmillan, 1991), 273–274.

    Google Scholar 

  43. On the potential applicability of the Geneva Conventions to the fighting in the colony and the camps, see Gerhard Pool, Samuel Maherero (Windhoek: Gamsberg Macmillan, 1991), 293.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Major Ludwiz von Estorff, Wanderungen and Kämpfe in Südewestafrika, Ostafrika und Südafriak (Wiesbaden: Wiesbadener Kurier Verlag, 1968), 117, cited in Steinmetz, “The Colonial State as a Social Field,” 603. Von Estorff went on to explain that “we could have saved many of the people and their herds of cattle if we had spared them and allowed them to return; their punishment had already been sufficient.” 117, cited in Steinmetz, “The Colonial State as a Social Field,” 603.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Some apparently believed that race wars were an inherent feature of colonialism itself that was more about the destruction of “natives” than about the civilization of the natives. See Julius Scharlach, Kolonial und politische Aufsätze und Reden (Berlin: Mittler, 1903), 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Madley, “From Africa to Auschwitz,” 446. For other examples of scholars who take a longitudinal view of the commission of atrocities, including commentaries on these camps, see Jurgen Zimmerer, Joachim Zeller and E. J. Neather, Genocide in German South-West Africa: The Colonial War of 1904–1908 and Its Aftermath (Dublin: Merlin Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  47. As I note in the concluding chapter of this book, various factions on several continents engaged, and continue to engage, in heated conversations about the morality and feasibility of having formal national apologies, legal redress, reparations, and repatriation of artifacts that are all parts of some complex and entangled German-Namibian histories and memories. For some excellent introductions to these debates about the challenges that face those asking for retributive justice for the Herero and Nama, see Jan-Bart Gewald, “Imperial Germany and the Herero of Southern Africa: Genocide and the Quest for Recompense,” Genocide and War Crimes and the West: History and Complicity, ed. Adam Jones (London: Zed Books, 2004), 59–77; Allan

    Google Scholar 

  48. D. Cooper, “Reparations for the Herero Genocide: Defining the Limits of International Litigation,” African Affairs 106 (2007): 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. On the alleged problems of coercive labor in the Congo Free State, see Adam Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sharon Sliwinski, Human Rights in Camera (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. See Rachel Hughes, “The Abject Artefacts of Memory: Photographs from Cambodia’s Genocide,” Media, Culture, and Society 25 (2003): 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jürgen Zimmerer and Joachim Zeller, eds. Genocide in German South-West Africa: The Colonial War (1904–1908) in Namibia and Its Aftermath, trans. Edward Neather (Monmouth, Wales: The Merlin Press, 2008), 85.

    Google Scholar 

  53. See Casper W. Erichsen, “Namibia’s Island of Death,” New African 421 (August/September, 2003): 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  54. See Andrew Bank, “Of’Native Skulls’ and’Noble Caucasians’: Phrenology in Colonial South Africa,” Journal of Southern African Studies 22 (1996): 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Clifton C. Crais, White Supremacy and Black Resistance in Pre-industrial South Africa: The Making of a Colonial Order in the Eastern Cape, 1770–1865 (Cambridge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Saul Debow, Scientific Racism in Modern South Africa (Cambridge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Andrew Smith, “Observations Relative to the Origin and History of the Bushmen,” South African Quarterly Journal 2, no. 1 (January-March 1830): 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  58. For an analysis of how colonial frontier ideologies could be used to influence the demise of the Xhose in what is called the “Cattle-Killing Movement,” see Jeff Peries, The Dead Will Arise (Jonathan Ball Publishers, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Arjun Appadurai, “Dead Certainty: Ethnic Violence in the Era of Globalization,” Public Culture 10 (1998): 242.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dr. Larissa Förster, cited in Magreth Nunuhe, “Dr. Förster Reveals Skull Trafficking,” New Era [Windhoek], October 31, 2011, paragraph 18, http://allafrica.com/stories/201110311497.html.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Peter Weingart, “German Eugenics between Science and Politics,” Osiris 5 (1989): 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Eugen Fischer, Die Rehobother Bastards and das Bastardierungsproblem bein Menschen: Anthropologische und ethnographische Studien an Rehobother Bastardvolk in Deutsch-Südwest-Afrika (Jena: Verla von Gustav Fisher, 1913).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Jürgen Zimmerer, “Annihilation in Africa: The “Race War” in German Southwest Africa (1904–1908) and Its Significance for a Global History of Genocide,” GHI Bulletin, 27 (fall 2005): 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rob Gordon, “Review: The Angel of Death Has Descended Violently among Them,” 2007, H-Net Reviews, http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev. phd&id=13600.

    Google Scholar 

  65. For an annotated copy of the infamous British/South African Blue Book, see Jeremy Silvester and Jan Bart-Gewald, Words Cannot Be Found: German Colonial Rule in Namibia: An Annotated Reprint of the 1918 Blue Book (Boston: Brill, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  66. L. H. Gann, “Economic Development In Germany’s African Empire, 1884–1914,” Colonialism in Africa 1870–1960, vol. 4, eds. Peter Duignan and L. H. Gann (London: Cambridge University Press, 1975), 213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communications, University of Utah, USA

    Hasian Marouf Jr. (Professor of Communications)

Authors
  1. Hasian Marouf Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2014 Hasian Marouf, Jr.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marouf, H. (2014). The German Konzentrationslager and the Debates about the Annihilation of the Herero, 1905–1908. In: Restorative Justice, Humanitarian Rhetorics, and Public Memories of Colonial Camp Cultures. Rhetoric, Politics and Society series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437112_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation