Abstract
Social media have been praised for their potential for facilitating civic engagement. At a time when one of the most difficult problems facing democracy in the Western hemisphere is the decline in citizens’ participation in politics (Dahlgren, 2009), this potential has been vested with hopes that social media can help reinvigorate extra-parliamentarian political participation — i.e. participation beyond the rights and obligations of liberal citizenship (e.g. voting) — and thus strengthen democratic accountability at national and international levels (e.g. Castells, 2013; Van Laer & Van Aelst, 2010). These accounts have highlighted new possibilities for bottom-up, self-organizing participation such as direct democracy and for bypassing mass media gatekeepers and taking action to address issues directly. At the same time, sceptics have pointed to challenges social media pose to extra-parliamentarian political participation. These accounts have highlighted the dominance of commercial interests, individualization, non-committal participation — or ‘clicktivism’ — and security and censorship (e.g. Dahlgren, 2013; Gladwell, 2010; Juris, 2012; Uldam, 2014).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almond, G. A. & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. London: Sage.
Askanius, T., & Uldam, J. (2011). Online social media for radical politics: climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(1), 69–84.
Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Embedding sustainability across the organization: A critical perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 719–731.
Bennett, W. (2003). Communicating global activism. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2), 143–168.
Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232–260.
Bennett, W. L., Wells, C., & Freelon, D. (2011). Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 835–856.
Böhm, S., Spicer, A., & Fleming, P. (2008). Infra-political dimensions of resistance to international business: A Neo-Gramscian approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(3), 169–182.
Boyd, A. (2013). Don’t Wait for the Revolution — Live it, Yes Magazine (July 2013), accessed October 2014 http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/love-and-the-apocalypse/don-t-wait-for-the-revolution-live-it-andrew-boyd
Brei, V., & Böhm, S. (2013). ‘1L= 10L for Africa’: Corporate social responsibility and the transformation of bottled water into a ‘consumer activist’ commodity. Discourse & Society, 25(1): 3–31.
Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering ‘difference’ in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700.
Calhoun, C. (2013). Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 26–38.
Calhoun, C. J. (ed.). (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cammaerts, B. (2007). Jamming the political: Beyond counter-hegemonic practices. Continuum, 21(1), 71–90.
Carpentier, N. (2012). Discursive Structures in the Network Society. Javnost-The Public, 19(4), 25–40.
Castells, M. (2013). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Couldry, N., Livingstone, S. M., & Markham, T. (2007). Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633.
Dahlberg, L. (2014). The Habermasian public sphere and exclusion: An engagement with poststructuralist-influenced critics. Communication Theory, 24(1), 21–41.
Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. London: Sage.
Dahlgren, P. (2001) ‘The Public Sphere and the Net: Structure, Space and Communication’, In L.W. Bennett and R.M. Entman (eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, pp. 33–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahlgren, P. 2003. “Reconfiguring Civic Culture in the New Media Milieu.” In J. Corner, and D. Pels (eds) Media and the Restyling of Politics, pp. 33–55. London: Sage.
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political communication, 22(2), 147–162.
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahlgren, P. (2013). The Political Web: Participation, Media, and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Bakker, F. G., den Hond, F., King, B., & Weber, K. (2013). Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 573–593.
Della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (2005). Transnational processes and social activism: An introduction. Transnational protest and global activism, 1.
Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.
Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202.
Downing, J. (2008). Social movement theories and alternative media: An evaluation and critique. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(1), 40–50.
Downing, J. D. H. (2000). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2013). Discourse and normative business ethics. In C. Luetge (ed.) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics, (pp. 549–580). Dortrecht: Springer.
Feigenbaum, A., Frenzel, F., & McCurdy, P. (2013) Protest Camps. London: Zed Books.
Fenton, N. (2007). Contesting global capital, new media, solidarity. In: Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (eds). (2007). Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and democratic media roles. Intellect Books.
Fenton, N. (2008). Mediating hope: New media, politics and resistance. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(2), 230–248.
Fenton, N., & Barassi, V. (2011). Alternative media and social networking sites: The politics of individuation and political participation. The Communication Review, 14(3), 179–196.
Fenton, N., & Downey, J. (2003). Counter public spheres and global modernity. JAVNOST-LJUBLJANA-, 10(1), 15–32.
Fraser, N. (1992) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere — a Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, in C. Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 109–41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freelon, D. G. (2010). Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1172–1190
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 187–216.
Gitlin, T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In: T. Liebes, & J. Curran (eds), Media Ritual and Identity (pp. 168–174). London: Routledge.
Gladwell, M. (2010). Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker, http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/10/04/small-change-3.
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.
Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Offentlicheit (Darmstadt and Neuwied); English translation: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans. T. Burger (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).
Habermas, Jürgen (1987) [1981]. Theory of Communicative Action Volume Two: Liveworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas A. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hartley, J. (2010). Silly citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 233–248.
Juris, J. S. (2008). Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Duke University Press.
Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279.
Karagianni, K. S., & Cornelissen, J. (2006). Anti-corporate movements and public relations. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 168–170.
King, B. G., & Pearce, N. A. (2010). The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual review of sociology, 36, 249–267.
Kraemer, R., Whiteman G., & Banerjee, B. (2013) Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: The importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements, Organization Studies, 34, 823.
Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Media studies’ fascination with the concept of the public sphere: Critical reflections and emerging debates. Media, Culture & Society, 35(1), 87–96.
Mansell, R. (2010) Commentary — mediating the public sphere: Democratic deliberation, communication gaps, and the personalization of politics. In Charles T. Salmon (ed.) Communication Yearbook 34 (pp. 259–274). Oxford: Routledge.
Martin-Barbero, J. (1993) Communication, Culture and Hegemony, London: Sage.
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management review, 30(1), 166–179.
Mouffe, Chantal (1998) ‘The radical centre. A politics without adversary’, Soundings, 9, Summer: 11–23.
Munro, I. (2014). Organizational Ethics and Foucault’s ‘Art of Living’: Lessons from Social Movement Organizations. Organization Studies, 35(8): 1127–1148.
Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–775.
Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.
Silverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History, 33(4), 761–780.
Starr, A. (2000). Naming the Enemy: Anti-Corporate Movements Confront Globalization. London: Zed Books.
Sullivan, S., Spicer, A. & Bohm, S. (2011) Becoming global (un)civil society: counter-hegemonic struggle and the Indymedia network. Globalizations, 8(5), 703–717.
Tarrow, S. (2001). Transnational politics: Contention and institutions in international politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 1–20.
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In: S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (eds), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 175–190), London: Sage.
Uldam, J. (2012). After the Protest: Online Social Media and Political Engagement. The 62nd ICA Annual Conference. Phoenix, 2012.
Uldam, J. (2013). Activism and the online mediation opportunity structure: Attempts to impact global climate change policies? Policy & Internet, 5(1), 56–
Uldam, J. (2014). Corporate management of visibility and the fantasy of the post-political: Social media and surveillance, New Media and Society, doi: 10.1177/1461444814541526.
Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171.
Van Zoonen, L., Vis, F., & Mihelj, S. (2010). Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 249–262.
Whelan, G. (2013). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 709–737.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Julie Uldam and Anne Vestergaard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uldam, J., Vestergaard, A. (2015). Introduction: Social Media and Civic Engagement. In: Uldam, J., Vestergaard, A. (eds) Civic Engagement and Social Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434166_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434166_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49288-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43416-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)