Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Defending the Fort: Michael Crichton, Pulp Fiction, and Green Conspiracy

  • Chapter
Book cover Voice and Environmental Communication

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the intersection of voice, narrative, and argument. All seek an audience, and all aim to constitute evaluative grounds. My case study is science-fiction author Michael Crichton’s broad critique of the North American environmental movement as exemplified in two texts: a 2003 speech titled “Environmentalism as religion,” and the 2004 thriller novel State of Fear. Each work strategically orchestrates the spheres of personal, technical, and public argumentation (Goodnight, 1982) and thus invites critique of the politically dexterous voice of a prominent writer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • About Michael Crichton (2012). Michael Crichton: The official site. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.crichton-official.com/aboutmichaelcrichton-biography.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcott, B. (2005, January 30). “State of Fear”: Not so hot. The New York Times. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html? res=9903E2DA1038F933A05752C0A9639C8B63.

  • Ceccarelli, L. (2001). Rhetorical criticism and the rhetoric of science. Western Journal of Communication, 65 (3), 314–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (2003, September 15). Environmentalism as religion. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/crichton_three_speeches.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (2004). State of Fear. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, B. J. (1997). Politicizing voice. Western Journal of Communication, 61(2), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. E. (2007, February 21). 216 Million Americans are scientifically illiterate (Part I). MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.technologyreview.com/view/407346/216-million-americans-are-scientifically-illiterate-part-i/

  • Fabj, V. (1993). Motherhood as political voice: The rhetoric of the mothers of Plaza de Mayo. Communication Studies, 44(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of moral public argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. (1987). Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, S., & Feder, M. A. (2011). Climate Change Education: Goals, Audiences, and Strategies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight, G. T. (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 18, 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight, G. T. (1995). The firm, the park, and the university: Fear and trembling on the postmodern trail. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81, 267–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight, G. T. (2005). Science and technology controversy: A rationale for inquiry. Argumentation and Advocacy, 42(1), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York, NY: Plenum Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guggenheim, D. (Director) (2006). An Inconvenient Truth. Film, Lawrence Bender Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariman, R. (1995). Political Style: The Artistry of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC History (2012). IPCCFacts. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.ipccfacts.org/history.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Janofsky, M. K. (2005, September 29). Michael Crichton, novelist, becomes senate witness. The New York Times. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/29/books/29cric.html

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Smith, N. (2011). Climate change in the American Mind: Public support for climate & energy policies in May 2011. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/PolicySupport May2011.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, S. M. (2001). Global warming wars: Rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to Exxon Mobil’s corporate public discourse. The Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyne, J. (2005). Science controversy, common sense, and the third culture. Argumentation and Advocacy, 42, 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. (2003). Exploring Media Discourse. London, UK: Hodder.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1998). Environmentalism, wise use and the nature of accumulation in the rural West. In B. Braun & N. Castree (Eds.), Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium (pp. 125–148). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, C. (2004, December 14). Crichton fans will embrace “Fear.” USA Today. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/books/reviews/2004–12–13-crichton_x.htm

  • Miller, A. (2006). Bad fiction, worse science. Issues in Science and Technology, 22(2), 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, W. (2006a). Climate zealotry produces bad policy. George C. Marshall Institute. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.marshall.org/article.php?id=451.

  • O’Keefe, W. (2006b). Group think masquerading as consensus. George C. Marshall Institute. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.marshall.org/article.php?id=450.

  • Paine, T. (1776). Common sense. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/commonsense/text.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Paliewicz, N. (2012). Global warming and the interaction between the public and technical spheres of argument: When standards for expertise really matter. Argumentation and Advocacy, 48(4), 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendley, W. (1995). War on the West: Government Tyranny on America’s Great Frontier. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D., & Leiss, W. (1997). Mad Cows and Mother’s Milk: The Perils of Poor Risk Communication. Montreal, QC: McGill/Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, N. (2010). Top 10 failed celebrity political campaigns. Time.com. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2009170_2009172_2009179,00.html

  • Solomon, S. Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyl, K. B., Tignor, M., & Miller, H. L. (Eds.) (2007). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Royal Society (2012). Climate change. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://royalsociety.org/policy/climate-change/

    Google Scholar 

  • Time.com (2012). Top 10 airplane books. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1923223,00.htm1

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Concerned Scientists (2008, June 19). Crichton’s thriller State of Fear: Separating fact from fiction. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/global_warming_contrarians/crichton-thriller-state-of.html

  • U.S. Department of State (2009). Office of the special envoy for climate change. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.state.gov/s/climate/index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voice (n.d.). In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from www.oed.com.

  • Wagner, T. (2008). Reframing ecotage as ecoterrorism: News and the discourse of fear. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 2(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallack, L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan, D., & Thernba, M. (1993). Media Advocacy and Public Health: Power for Prevention. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, A. (2004, December 26). Crichton techno-thriller explores danger of mixing politics, science. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.post-gazette.corn/stories/ae/book-reviews/state-of-fear-by-michael-crichton-563693/

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, E. K. (2001). “Voice” and “voicelessness” in rhetorical studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. M. (1997). Listening to their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Women. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whidden, R. A. (2012). Maternal expertise, vaccination recommendations, and the complexity of argument spheres. Argumentation and Advocacy, 48(4), 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012). Climate change. Retrieved 1 August 2013 from http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climatechange

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Patrick Belanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Utah State University, USA

    Jennifer Peeples

  2. University of Cincinnati, USA

    Stephen Depoe

Copyright information

© 2014 Patrick Belanger

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belanger, P. (2014). Defending the Fort: Michael Crichton, Pulp Fiction, and Green Conspiracy. In: Peeples, J., Depoe, S. (eds) Voice and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137433749_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation