Skip to main content

Identity, Responsibility and Corporate Personhood

  • Chapter
The True Value of CSR
  • 1388 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we will look at one particular aspect of the idea of corporate identity, namely that of responsibility, and how far this might be explained in terms of personhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle (1941) Nichomachean Ethics book VII chs 1–10, trans. R. McKeon, Random House, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, I. and Winstanley, D. (2007) ‘For or Against Corporate Identity? Personification and the Problem of Moral Agency’, Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. (2008) ‘Identity-Based Views of the Corporation: Insights from Corporate Identity, Organizational Identity, Social Identity, Visual Identity’, European Journal of Marketing, 42, 9–10, 879–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. (2011) ‘Corporate Marketing Myopia and the Inexorable Rise of a Corporate Marketing Logic’, European Journal of Marketing, 45, 9–10, 1329–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A.F. and McHugh, P. (1971) ‘The Social Ascription of Motives’, American Sociological Review, 36, 1, 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1980) Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1982) Corporations and Morality, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P. (1984) Collective and Corporate Responsibility, Columbia University Press,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (1997) ‘Relations Between Organizational Culture, Identity and Image’, European Journal of Marketing, 31, 5–6, 356–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, H. (2012) ‘Corporate Identity Anchors: A Managerial Cognition Perspective’, European Journal of Marketing, 46, 5, 609–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, V.H. (2012) ‘Theories of Corporate Groups: Corporate Identity Reconceived’, Seton Hall Law Review, 42, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S.R., Rhodes, C. and Kornberger, M. (2006) ‘The Ethics of Managerial Subjectivity’, Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyamabo, J., Owolawi, S., Otubanjo, O. and Balogun, T. (2013) ‘Corporate Identity: Identifying Dominant Elements in CI Models’, Journal of Management Research, 5, 3, 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2012 [1774]) Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans, Gregor, M. and Timmermann, J., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lok, J. (2010) ‘Institutional Logics As Identity Projects’, Academy Of Management Journal, 53, 6, 1305–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R. (1984) ‘Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood’, Journal of Business Ethics, 3, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melewar, T. and Karaosmanoglu, E. (2006) ‘Seven Dimensions of Corporate Identity: A Categorisation from the Practitioners’ Perspectives’, European Journal of Marketing, 40, 7–8, 846–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesteruk, J. (1990) ‘Persons, Property, and the Corporation: A Proposal for a New Paradigm’, De Paul Law Review, 39, 543–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M. (2013) ‘The Relationship between Identity Crises and Crises of Control’, Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripken, S. (2009) ‘Corporations are People Too’, Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 15, 97–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. and Child, J. (2008) ‘The Development of Corporate Identity: A Political Perspective’, Journal of Management Studies, 45, 5, 885–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (1989) ‘Corporate Persons’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume 63), 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachout, Z.R. (2011) ‘Historical Roots of Citizens United vs. FEC: How Anarchists and Academics Accidentally Created Corporate Speech Rights, The General Essay’, Harvard Law and Policy Review, 5, 163–187; online at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/431 [accessed 22 September 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riel, C. (1995) Principles of Corporate Communication, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. (1998) ‘Corporations as Intentional Systems’, Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. (1985) Persons Rights and Corporations, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Paul Griseri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Griseri, P. (2015). Identity, Responsibility and Corporate Personhood. In: Fryzel, B. (eds) The True Value of CSR. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137433206_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics