Abstract
The spatial issue has traditionally played a role in organizational and management studies (Clegg & Kornberger, 2006). This chapter contributes to the recent growing interest of scholars in the relationship between spatial structure and organizational practices through the idea of “organizational space” (Hernes, 2004; Taylor & Spicer, 2007; Elsbach & Pratt, 2007; Van Marrewijk & Yanow, 2010; de Vaujany & Vaast, 2013).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Choay, F. (1965). L’Urbanisme, Utopies et Réalités. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2006). Space, Organizations and Management Theory. Oslo and Copenhagen: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
de Vaujany F.-X. (2011). A new perspective on the genealogy of collective action through the history of religious organisations. Management and Organizational History, 5(1), 65–78.
de Vaujany, F.-X., & Vaast, E. (2013). If these walls could talk: the mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy, Organization Science, September, 1–9.
Dober, R. (1963). Campus Planning. New York: Reinhold.
Duby, J.-J. (1999). Propositions pour le Plateau de Saclay. rapport remis à Claude Allègre.
Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). 4 The Physical Environment in Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 181–224.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
Foucault, M. (1977) [1975]. Discipline and Punish. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1977) [1971]. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In M. Foucault, & D. F. Bouchard (eds) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 139–164.
Genestier, P. (2002). L’université et la cité. Espaces et sociétés, 80–81, 21–41.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Githens, A. M. (1907). Universities, colleges and schools. The Brickbuilder, article V, December.
Gropius W. (1965) [1935]. The New Architecture and the Bauhaus. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.
Hamlin, A. D. F. (1903). Recent American college architecture. The Outlook, 1 August, 790–799.
Hernes, T. (2004). The Spatial Construction of Organization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Hoskin, K., & Macue, R. (1986). Accounting and examination: a genealogy of disciplinary power, Accounting Organisations and Society, 11(2), 105–136.
Hottin, C. (2004). Les Délices du campus ou le douloureux exil. Trois grandes écoles parisiennes face à leur transfert (1950–1980). Histoire de l’Education, 102, 267–293.
Humboldt, W. von (1903–1936). Gesammelte Schriften. Ausgabe der Preubischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Werke [Oeuvres choisies: Edition de l’Académie des Sciences de Prusse], Berlin, 17.
Le Corbusier (1973) [1933]. The Athens Charter. New York: Grossman Publishers.
Le Corbusier (1937). Quand les Cathédrales Etaient Blanches: Voyage au Pays des Timides. Paris: Plon.
Plan-Campus du plateau de Saclay (2009). Rapport, Tomes 1 et 2.
Merlin, P. (1995). Urbanisme Universitaire à l’Etranger et en France. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées.
Musselin, C. (2001). La Longue Marche des Universités Françaises. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Sciences Sociales et Sociétés).
Muthesius, S. (2000). The Postwar University. Utopianist Campus and College. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Olmsted, F. L. (1997) Civilizing American Cities: Writings on City Landscapes. Cambridge, Ma.: Da Capo Press.
Pesqueux, Y., & Saudan, A. (1996). Foucault et la méthode généalogique: à propos de “surveiller et punir”. Comptabilité et Développement, 1041–1055.
Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, November–December, 77–90.
IDEX Paris-Saclay (2012). Submission Form.
Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: a narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Review, 9(4), 325–346.
Turner, P. V. (1984). Campus: An American Planning Tradition. Cambridge, London, New-York: M.I.T Press and the Architectural History Foundation.
Vaaland, M. (2010). What we Talk about when we Talk about Space: End User Participation between Processes of Organizational and Architectural Design, PhD dissertation. Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School. http://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/8002/Marianne_StangVaaland.pdf?sequence=1
Van Marrewijk, A., & Yanow, D. (2010). Organizational Spaces, Rematerializing the Workaday World. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Yoo, Y., Boland, R., & Lyytinen, K. (2006). From organization design to organization designing. Organization Science, 17(2), March–April, 215–229
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Caroline Scotto
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scotto, C. (2014). The Principles of Campus Conception: A Spatial and Organizational Genealogy. What Knowledge Can We Use from a Historical Study in Order to Analyse the Design Processes of a New Campus?. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Laniray, P., Vaast, E. (eds) Materiality and Time. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432124_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432124_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49239-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43212-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)