Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to stimulate the contribution that historical awareness may add to the field of information systems (IS) research. Despite the offerings from the study of history, the IS community has not developed a strong tradition of historical research (Land, 2010; Mitev & de Vaujany, 2012; see also a special issue on history in IS research, Bryant et al., 2013). Arguably, the adoption of historical sensitivity and awareness is especially pertinent in a field that is often driven by the “awesome potential” of advanced information and communication technologies. All too frequently, we lose sight of some of the difficulties that are being posed as we are seduced by new technology, and the field of IS especially can suffer from presentism (see Hartog’s chapter in this book). The acquisition of a historical consciousness may enable the evaluation of these changes within their historical context and origins. Quite often superficial changes are focused upon by the management consultancy “change industry”, and so concepts and themes are often repackaged several years later (Westrup, 2005), with little awareness as to how these recent trends compare with similar developments in the past.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, M. T., & Hecht, G. (2001). Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press.
Alvesson, A. M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage.
Avgerou, C., Siemer, J., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (1999). The academic field of information systems in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 136–153.
Bannister, F. (2002). The dimension of time: historiography in information systems research. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 1(1), 1–10.
Banville, C., & Landry, M. (1989). Can the field of MIS be disciplined? Communications of the ACM, 32, 48–60.
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183–194.
Bernroider, E. W., Pilkington, A., & Córdoba, J. (2013). Research in information systems: a study of diversity and inter-disciplinary discourse in the AIS basket journals between 1995 and 2011. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 74–89.
Booth, C., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). Management and organizational history: prospects. Management & Organizational History, 1(1), 5–30.
Bowker, G. C. (1998). Modest reviewer goes on virtual voyage: some recent literature of cyberspace. Technology and Culture, 39, 499–511.
Braun, H.-J. (2000). Current research in the history of technology in Europe. In G. Hollister-Short (ed.) History of Technology, London: Continuum, Volume 21, 167–188.
Brunninge, O. (2009). Using history in organizations: how managers make purposeful reference to history in strategy processes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 8–26.
Bryant, A., Black, A., Land, F., & Porra, J. (2013). Information systems history: what is history? what is IS history? what IS history?…and why even bother with history? Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 1–17.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: a re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 977–1002.
Campbell-Kelly, M. (1998). Data processing and technological change: the post office savings bank, 1861–1930. Technology and Culture, 39(1), 1–32.
Campbell-Kelly, M. (2003). From Airline Reservations to Sonic the Hedgehog: A History of the Software Industry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Campbell-Kelly, M. (2010). Historical reflections: victorian data processing. Communications of the ACM, 53(10), 19–21.
Campbell-Kelly, M., & Asprey, W. (1996). Computer: A History of the Information Machine. New York: Basic Books.
Campbell-Kelly, M., & Garcia-Swartz, D. (2013). The history of the internet: the missing narratives. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 18–33.
Caswill, C., & Wensley, R. (2007). Doors and boundaries: a recent history of the relationship between research and practice in UK organizational and management research. Business History, 49(3), 293–320.
Carr, E. H. (1961). What is History? Middlesex: Penguin.
Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Clark, P., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). The treatment of history in organisation studies: towards an “historic turn”? Business History, 46(3), 331–352.
Cooke, B. (1999). Writing the left out of management theory: the historiography of the management of change. Organization, 6(1), 81–105.
Cortada, J. W. (1996). Information Technology as Business History: Issues in History and Management of Computers. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Cortada, J. W. (2004). The Digital Hand: How Computers Changed the Work of American Manufacturing, Transportation and Retail Industries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Culnan, M., & Swanson, E. (1986). Research in management information systems 1980–1984: points of work and reference. MIS Quarterly, Sept., 289–301.
Delahaye, A., Booth, C., Clark, P., Procter, S., & Rowlinson, M. (2009). The genre of corporate history. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 27–48.
de Vaujany, F-X. (2006). Conceptualizing IS archetypes through history: the case of the Roman Curia. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Dec.
de Vaujany, F., Walsh, I., & Mitev, N. (2011). A historically grounded critical analysis of research articles in IS. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 395–417.
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2010). Actor-network theory: ANTi-history and critical organizational historiography. Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Montreal, 6–10 August 2010.
Elbanna, A. R. (2002). Information technology and organisational transformation: history, rhetoric and practice. Information Technology & People, 15(2), 175–179.
Fox, R. E. (1996). Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Gannon, B. (2013). Outsiders: an exploratory history of IS in corporations. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 50–62.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Fabbri, T. (2002). Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(6), 622.
Gillenson, M., & Stutz, J. (1991). Academic issues in MIS: journals and books. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 147–452.
Grey, C. J. (2005). How should we do the history of organization theory? Organization, 12(6), 925–927 (Book Review: Reflections on the “State” of Organizational Theory).
Grint, K. (1997). TQM, BPR, JIT, BSCs and TLAs: managerial waves or drownings? Management Decision, 35(10), 731–738.
Haigh, T. (2001). Inventing information systems: the systems men and the computer, 1950–1968. Business History Review, 75(1), 61.
Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1997). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 7(4), 183–211.
Hardgrave, B., & Walstrom, K. (1997). Forums for MIS scholars. Communications of the ACM, 40(11), 119–124.
Hartt, C. M., Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2009). Performing the past: ANTi-history, gendered spaces and feminist practice, 26th European Group on Organisation Studies (EGOS) Colloquium (Lisbon, June).
Hecht, G., & Allen, M. T. (2001). Authority, political machines and technology’s history. In M. T. Allen, & G. Hecht (eds) Technologies of Power, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 1–28.
Heinrich, L. J., & Riedl, R. (2013). Understanding the dominance and advocacy of the design-oriented research approach in the business informatics community: a history-based examination. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 34–49.
Hirschheim, R. A. (1985). Information systems epistemology: an historical perspective. In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, & G. Fitzgerald (eds) Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 13–38.
Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2000). Information systems research at the crossroads: external versus internal views. In R. Baskerville, J. Stage, & J. DeGross (eds) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 233–254.
Holsapple, C., Johnson, L., Manakyan, H., & Tanner, J. (1994). Business computing research journals: a normalized citation analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 131–140.
Howcroft, D. A., Mitev, N. N., & Wilson, M. (2004). What we may learn from the social shaping of technology approach. In L. Willcocks, & J. Mingers (eds) Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, Chichester: John Wiley (Information Systems Series), 329–371.
Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, Ma.: John Hopkins University Press.
Ingelstam, L. (1996). Complex Technical Systems. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research.
Jacques, R. (1996). Manufacturing the Employee: Management Knowledge from the 19th to 21st Centuries. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
Keen, P. G. W. (1991). Relevance and rigor in information systems research. In H.-E. Nissen, H. Klein, & R. Hirschheim (eds) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 27–50.
Kieser, A. (1994). Why organization theory needs historical analyses — and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5(4), 609–620.
Kieser, A. (1997). Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. Organization, 4(1), 49–74.
Land, F. (2010). The use of history in IS research: an opportunity missed? Journal of Information Technology, 25(4), 385–394.
Lawrence, B. (1984). Historical perspective: using the past to study the present. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 307–312.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science, social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.
MacKenzie, D. (1996). How do we know the properties of artefacts? Applying the sociology of knowledge to technology. In Robert Fox (ed.) Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology, London: Harwood, pp. 247–263.
MacKenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. (eds) (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Martins, L-P. (2009). The nature of the changing role of first-tier managers: a long-cycle approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 92–123.
Mason, R. O., McKenney, J. L., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Developing an historical tradition in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 257–320.
McKenney, J. L., Mason, R., & Copeland, D.G. (1997). Bank of America: the crest and trough of technological leadership. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 321–353.
Mitev, N., & de Vaujany, F-X. (2012). Seizing the opportunity: towards a historiography of information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 1–15.
Mitev, N. and D. Howcroft (2011) Poststructuralism, Science and Technology Studies and Actor Network Theory: what can they bring to IS research? in R. Galliers & W. Currie (eds) Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 329–371.
Myers, M. D., & Avison, D. (2002). Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader. London: Sage.
Mylonopoulos, N., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). On-site: global perceptions of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 44(9), 29–33.
O’Brien, J., Remenyi, D., & Keaney, A. (2004). Historiography — a neglected research method in business and management studies. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(2), 135–144.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
Oshri, I., & Van Uhm, B. (2012). A historical review of the information technology and business process captive centre sector. Journal of Information Technology, 27(4), 270–284.
Pickering, A. (2013). Living in the material world. In F.-X. de Vaujany, & N. Mitev (eds) Materiality and Space: Organisations, Artefacts and Practices, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–40.
Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. S. (2005). The History of Texaco’s corporate information technology function: a general systems theoretical interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 721–746.
Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. S. (2006). Forty years of the corporate information technology function at Texaco Inc. — a history. Information and Organization, 16, 82–107.
Rowlinson, M., Clark, P., Delahaye, A., Booth, C., & Procter, S. (2008). The uses of History as corporate knowledge. In H. Scarbrough (ed.) The Evolution of Business Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–356.
Slaton, A., & Abbate, J. (2001). The hidden lives of standards: technical prescriptions and the transformation of work in America. Technologies of Power, 95–144.
Stowell, F., & Mingers, J. (1997). Introduction. In J. Mingers, & F. Stowell (eds) Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw-Hill.
Usdiken, B., & Kieser, A. (2004). Introduction: history in organisation studies. Business History, 46(3), 321–330.
Wells, W. (2000). Certificates and computers: the remaking of Wall Street 1967–1971. Business History Review, 72, 193–235.
Westrup, C. (2005). Management fashions and information systems. In D. Howcroft, & E. M. Trauth (eds) Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Whitman, M., Hendrickson, A., & Townsend, A. (1999). Research commentary. Academic rewards for teaching, research and service: data and discourse. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 99–109.
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 865–899.
Winter, S., & Taylor, L. (2001). The Role of information technology in the transformation of work: a comparison of post-industrial, industrial and proto-industrial organization. In J. Yates, & J. Van Maanen (eds) Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric and Practice, London: Sage, 7–34.
Yates, J. (2005). Structuring the Information Age: Life Insurance and Technology in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zald, M. N. (2002). Spinning disciplines: critical management studies in the context of the transformation of management education. Organization, 9(3), 365–385.
Zan, L. (2004). Accounting and management discourse in protoindustrial settings: the Venice Arsenal in the turn of the XVI Century. Accounting and Business Research, 32, 145–175.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Nathalie Mitev
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitev, N. (2014). The Role of History in Information Systems Research: Beyond Presentism. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Laniray, P., Vaast, E. (eds) Materiality and Time. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432124_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432124_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49239-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43212-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)