Skip to main content

‘Identity’ in International Relations and Foreign Policy Theory

  • Chapter
Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World

Abstract

Quoting George Orwell, Frederick Cooper and Roger Brubaker once suggested that instead of elaborating alternative and better suited analytical concepts for social inquiry,1 the social sciences and the humanities have ‘surrendered’ to the word ‘identity’ — ‘the worst thing one could do with words’ (Brubaker and Cooper, 2000, 1).2 Indeed, the growing interest in this concept in social science in general, but also in International Relations (IR) and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) in particular, has not led to a substantial clarification about the relevance of identity in contemporary (international) politics. Considering the significant proliferation of conceptualizations, it even seems as though the field now amounts to ‘definitional anarchy’ (Abdelal et al., 2006, 695), apparently depriving the concept of any analytical advantage. Nonetheless, identity-based theoretical explanations of foreign policy and international relations have continued to gain popularity, even across fairly different paradigms and schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y., Johnston, A. I., and McDermont, R. (2006) ‘Identity as a Variable’, Perspectives on Politics, 4:(4), 695–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y., Johnston, A. I., and McDermont, R. (eds.) (2009). Measuring Identity. A Guide for Social Scientists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M., Levin, S., and Henry, P. J. (2005) ‘Image Theory, Social Identity, and Social Dominance: Structural Characteristics and Individual Motives Underlying International Images’, Political Psychology, 26:(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. and Verba, S. (eds.) (1980) The Civic Culture Revisited (London: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashizawa, K. (2008) ‘When Identity Matters: State Identity, Regional Institution Building and Japanese Foreign Policy’, International Studies Review, 10:(3), 571–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banchoff, T. (1999) ‘German Identity and European Integration’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(3), 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. (1999) ‘Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(1), 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berenskoetter, F. (2010) ‘Identity in International Relations’, in Denemark R. (ed.) The International Studies Compendium Project (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 3594–3611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T. U. (1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan’, in Katzenstein, P. (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, W. (1990) Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broderson, A. (1961) ‘National Character. An Old Problem Revisited’, in Rosenau, J. (ed.) International Politics and Foreign Policy (Glencoe: Free Press of Glencoe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R and Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond “identity”’, Theory and Society, 29:(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. (2000) ‘The Passion of World Politics. Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships’, International Security, 24:(4), 116–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1987a) On Diplomacy. A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1987b) ‘Mediating Estrangement. A Theory for Diplomacy’, Review of International Studies, 13:(2), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. W. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Sea (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (1999) ‘Speaking “Europe”: The Politics of Integration Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6:(4), 598–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (2010) ‘Europäische Identität, die EU und das Andere. Von der Vergangenheit und neuen Grenzziehungen’, in Winkler C. and J. Wienand (eds.) Die kulturelle Integration Europas (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. (1996) ‘Norms, Culture and World Politics. Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism’, International Organization, 50:(2), 325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (1993) Metaphors of Identity: A Culture–Communication Dialogue (Albany: State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. (eds.) (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K. (1970) ‘National Role Conception in the Study of Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 14:(3), 233–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005) ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 6:(4), 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2008) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M. (2002) Research Report on the Use of Identity Concepts in International Relations (Harvard Identity Project, Weatherhead Center for International Relations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. (2005) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. (2010) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Origins (1954–93) and Contestations’, The International Studies Encyclopedia (Denemark: Blackwell Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. and Vore, C. (1995) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’, Mershon International Studies Review, 39:(2), 209–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R., Wendt, A., and Katzenstein, P. (1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security’, in Katzenstein, P. (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996) The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krappmann, L. (1969) Soziologische Dimensionen der Identität: Strukturelle Bedingungen für die Teilnahme an Interaktionsprozessen (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. (1996) ‘Is the Ship of Culture at Sea or Returning?’ in Lapid, Y. and F. Kratochwil (eds.) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. (2007) ‘Re-Thinking the “Inter” in International Politics’, Millennium, 35:(3), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurki, M. (2006) ‘Causes of a Divided Discipline: Rethinking the Concept of Cause in International Relations Theory’, Review of International Studies, 32:(2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapid, Y. (1996) ‘Culture’s Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory’, in Lapid, Y. and F. Kratochwil (eds.) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J. (2009) ‘The Plasticity of Identity under Anarchy’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:(1), 37–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Prestre, P. (ed.) (1997) Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transitions (Montreal: McGill University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, M and Risse, T. (eds.) (2003) Europeanization, Collective Identities and Public Discourses. IDNET Final Report, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, H. (1990/1991) ‘Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers’, Foreign Affairs, 69:(5), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (1995) ‘Anarchy and Identity’, International Organization, 49:(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (2010) ‘Emotional Beliefs’, International Organization, 64:(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, J. (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(2), 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. (1967) Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabers, D. (2008) ‘9/11 and the Rise of Political Fundamentalism in the Bush Administration. Domestic Legitimatization versus International Estrangement?’ Global Change, Peace and Security, 20:(2), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabers, D. (2009) ‘Filling the Void of Meaning. Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 5:(2), 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I. (1993) ‘Russia as Central Europe’s Constituting Other’, East European Politics and Society, 12:(2), 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I. (1996a) Russia and the Idea of Europe. A Study in Identity and International Relations (New York: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I. (1996b) ‘Self and Other in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:(2), 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1947) Moral Man and Immoral Society (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Omoniyi, T. (2006) ‘Hierarchies of Identity’, in Omoniyi, T. and G. White (eds.) The Sociolinguistics of Identity (London: Continuum International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, L. and Verba, S. (eds.) (1965) Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. (1996) Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., Hermann, R., and Brewer, M. (eds.) (2004) Transnational Identities. Becoming European in the European Union (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. and van der Veen, M. (2005) ‘The Emergence of a Shared Identity: An Agent-Based Computer Simulation of Idea Diffusion’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49:(5), 686–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. (1998) ‘Interests, Identity and American Foreign Policy’, in Ruggie, J. (ed.) Constructing the World Polity (New York: Routledge).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1986) ‘The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour’, in Worchel, S. and W. Austin (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, M. and Warriner, I. (1997) ‘Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes toward International Conflict: Exploring Relationships with Survey Data from the Middle East’, World Politics, 49:(2), 250–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., and Wetherell, M. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. (1965) ‘Comparative Political Culture’, in Pye, L and S. Verba (eds.) Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, O. (2002) ‘Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy. Discourse Analysis as a Foreign Policy Theory’, in Hansen, L. and O. Waever (eds.) European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States (London: Routledge), 20–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1987) Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis (Durham: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. and Mendlowitz, S. H. (1990) Contending Sovereignties: Redefining Political Community (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1959) Man, the State, and War (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. (1995) Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldes, J. (1993) Constructing National Interests: The Logic of US National Security in the Post-War Era. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, C. (1997) Collective Identities in World Society. Some Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations. World Society Research Group Working Paper No. 6. Frankfurt am Main and Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organisation, 41:(3), 335–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organisation, 46:(2), 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1994) ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, American Political Science Review, 88:(2), 384–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M. (1995) ‘Well, What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs, 71:(2), 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Ursula Stark Urrestarazu

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urrestarazu, U.S. (2015). ‘Identity’ in International Relations and Foreign Policy Theory. In: Hellmann, G., Jørgensen, K.E. (eds) Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431912_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics