Abstract
Quoting George Orwell, Frederick Cooper and Roger Brubaker once suggested that instead of elaborating alternative and better suited analytical concepts for social inquiry,1 the social sciences and the humanities have ‘surrendered’ to the word ‘identity’ — ‘the worst thing one could do with words’ (Brubaker and Cooper, 2000, 1).2 Indeed, the growing interest in this concept in social science in general, but also in International Relations (IR) and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) in particular, has not led to a substantial clarification about the relevance of identity in contemporary (international) politics. Considering the significant proliferation of conceptualizations, it even seems as though the field now amounts to ‘definitional anarchy’ (Abdelal et al., 2006, 695), apparently depriving the concept of any analytical advantage. Nonetheless, identity-based theoretical explanations of foreign policy and international relations have continued to gain popularity, even across fairly different paradigms and schools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y., Johnston, A. I., and McDermont, R. (2006) ‘Identity as a Variable’, Perspectives on Politics, 4:(4), 695–711.
Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y., Johnston, A. I., and McDermont, R. (eds.) (2009). Measuring Identity. A Guide for Social Scientists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Alexander, M., Levin, S., and Henry, P. J. (2005) ‘Image Theory, Social Identity, and Social Dominance: Structural Characteristics and Individual Motives Underlying International Images’, Political Psychology, 26:(1), 27–45.
Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Almond, G. and Verba, S. (eds.) (1980) The Civic Culture Revisited (London: Sage Publications).
Ashizawa, K. (2008) ‘When Identity Matters: State Identity, Regional Institution Building and Japanese Foreign Policy’, International Studies Review, 10:(3), 571–598.
Banchoff, T. (1999) ‘German Identity and European Integration’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(3), 259–289.
Barnett, M. (1999) ‘Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(1), 5–36.
Bartelson, J. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Berenskoetter, F. (2010) ‘Identity in International Relations’, in Denemark R. (ed.) The International Studies Compendium Project (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 3594–3611.
Berger, T. U. (1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan’, in Katzenstein, P. (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
Bloom, W. (1990) Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Broderson, A. (1961) ‘National Character. An Old Problem Revisited’, in Rosenau, J. (ed.) International Politics and Foreign Policy (Glencoe: Free Press of Glencoe).
Brubaker, R and Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond “identity”’, Theory and Society, 29:(1), 1–34.
Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Crawford, N. (2000) ‘The Passion of World Politics. Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships’, International Security, 24:(4), 116–156.
Der Derian, J. (1987a) On Diplomacy. A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Der Derian, J. (1987b) ‘Mediating Estrangement. A Theory for Diplomacy’, Review of International Studies, 13:(2), 91–110.
Deutsch, K. W. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Sea (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Diez, T. (1999) ‘Speaking “Europe”: The Politics of Integration Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6:(4), 598–613.
Diez, T. (2010) ‘Europäische Identität, die EU und das Andere. Von der Vergangenheit und neuen Grenzziehungen’, in Winkler C. and J. Wienand (eds.) Die kulturelle Integration Europas (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
Finnemore, M. (1996) ‘Norms, Culture and World Politics. Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism’, International Organization, 50:(2), 325–347.
Fitzgerald, T. (1993) Metaphors of Identity: A Culture–Communication Dialogue (Albany: State University of New York Press).
Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. (eds.) (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Holsti, K. (1970) ‘National Role Conception in the Study of Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 14:(3), 233–309.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005) ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 6:(4), 419–443.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2008) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:(1), 1–23.
Horowitz, M. (2002) Research Report on the Use of Identity Concepts in International Relations (Harvard Identity Project, Weatherhead Center for International Relations).
Hudson, V. (2005) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30.
Hudson, V. (2010) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Origins (1954–93) and Contestations’, The International Studies Encyclopedia (Denemark: Blackwell Publishing).
Hudson, V. and Vore, C. (1995) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’, Mershon International Studies Review, 39:(2), 209–238.
Jepperson, R., Wendt, A., and Katzenstein, P. (1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security’, in Katzenstein, P. (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996) The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
Krappmann, L. (1969) Soziologische Dimensionen der Identität: Strukturelle Bedingungen für die Teilnahme an Interaktionsprozessen (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta).
Kratochwil, F. (1996) ‘Is the Ship of Culture at Sea or Returning?’ in Lapid, Y. and F. Kratochwil (eds.) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).
Kratochwil, F. (2007) ‘Re-Thinking the “Inter” in International Politics’, Millennium, 35:(3), 495–511.
Kurki, M. (2006) ‘Causes of a Divided Discipline: Rethinking the Concept of Cause in International Relations Theory’, Review of International Studies, 32:(2), 189–216.
Lapid, Y. (1996) ‘Culture’s Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory’, in Lapid, Y. and F. Kratochwil (eds.) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).
Legro, J. (2009) ‘The Plasticity of Identity under Anarchy’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:(1), 37–65.
Le Prestre, P. (ed.) (1997) Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transitions (Montreal: McGill University Press).
Maier, M and Risse, T. (eds.) (2003) Europeanization, Collective Identities and Public Discourses. IDNET Final Report, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute.
Maull, H. (1990/1991) ‘Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers’, Foreign Affairs, 69:(5), 91–106.
Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).
Mercer, J. (1995) ‘Anarchy and Identity’, International Organization, 49:(2), 229–252.
Mercer, J. (2010) ‘Emotional Beliefs’, International Organization, 64:(1), 1–31.
Milliken, J. (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(2), 225–254.
Morgenthau, H. (1967) Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Nabers, D. (2008) ‘9/11 and the Rise of Political Fundamentalism in the Bush Administration. Domestic Legitimatization versus International Estrangement?’ Global Change, Peace and Security, 20:(2), 169–184.
Nabers, D. (2009) ‘Filling the Void of Meaning. Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 5:(2), 191–214.
Neumann, I. (1993) ‘Russia as Central Europe’s Constituting Other’, East European Politics and Society, 12:(2), 349–369.
Neumann, I. (1996a) Russia and the Idea of Europe. A Study in Identity and International Relations (New York: Routledge).
Neumann, I. (1996b) ‘Self and Other in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:(2), 139–174.
Niebuhr, R. (1947) Moral Man and Immoral Society (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).
Omoniyi, T. (2006) ‘Hierarchies of Identity’, in Omoniyi, T. and G. White (eds.) The Sociolinguistics of Identity (London: Continuum International Publishing).
Pye, L. and Verba, S. (eds.) (1965) Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Ringmar, E. (1996) Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Risse, T., Hermann, R., and Brewer, M. (eds.) (2004) Transnational Identities. Becoming European in the European Union (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).
Rousseau, D. and van der Veen, M. (2005) ‘The Emergence of a Shared Identity: An Agent-Based Computer Simulation of Idea Diffusion’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49:(5), 686–712.
Ruggie, J. (1998) ‘Interests, Identity and American Foreign Policy’, in Ruggie, J. (ed.) Constructing the World Polity (New York: Routledge).
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1986) ‘The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour’, in Worchel, S. and W. Austin (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers).
Tessler, M. and Warriner, I. (1997) ‘Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes toward International Conflict: Exploring Relationships with Survey Data from the Middle East’, World Politics, 49:(2), 250–281.
Turner, J., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., and Wetherell, M. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell).
Verba, S. (1965) ‘Comparative Political Culture’, in Pye, L and S. Verba (eds.) Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Waever, O. (2002) ‘Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy. Discourse Analysis as a Foreign Policy Theory’, in Hansen, L. and O. Waever (eds.) European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States (London: Routledge), 20–49.
Walker, S. (1987) Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis (Durham: Duke University Press).
Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Walker, R. B. J. and Mendlowitz, S. H. (1990) Contending Sovereignties: Redefining Political Community (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).
Waltz, K. (1959) Man, the State, and War (New York: Columbia University Press).
Weber, C. (1995) Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Weldes, J. (1993) Constructing National Interests: The Logic of US National Security in the Post-War Era. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota.
Weller, C. (1997) Collective Identities in World Society. Some Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations. World Society Research Group Working Paper No. 6. Frankfurt am Main and Darmstadt.
Wendt, A. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organisation, 41:(3), 335–370.
Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organisation, 46:(2), 391–425.
Wendt, A. (1994) ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, American Political Science Review, 88:(2), 384–396.
Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Zalewski, M. (1995) ‘Well, What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs, 71:(2), 339–356.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Ursula Stark Urrestarazu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Urrestarazu, U.S. (2015). ‘Identity’ in International Relations and Foreign Policy Theory. In: Hellmann, G., Jørgensen, K.E. (eds) Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431912_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431912_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68290-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43191-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)