Abstract
In the United Kingdom, and in many societies, whatever level of support might be available outside the child’s home, the primary carers for children with autism are often their own family members, usually their parents. Consequently, parents’ resources for supporting their children’s capacity to engage in activities are of considerable practical importance and merit careful analysis. Indeed, there is evidence from a randomised control study that a joint engagement programme can have a positive long-term effect on children’s abilities (Kasari, Gulsrud, Wong, Kwon, & Locke, 2010). A general aim of parents’ participation in children’s activities (including neurotypical children) is to enable children to achieve more than they could unaided. The importance of such co-participation is captured by Vygotsky’s influential idea of the zone of proximal development (ZPD). This refers to a region which is just beyond a child’s current sphere of competence but into which the child can move through the involvement of a more experienced peer or carer. For Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory of learning, it is not merely that the child can achieve more with support but rather that such supportive encounters are fundamental for development. He states that the ZPD ‘awakens a variety of internal developmental processes that are able to operate only when the child is interacting with people in his environment’ (Vygotsky, 1978, p. 90). The term ‘scaffolding’ (Wood, Bruner, & Ross, 1976) is a related metaphor that is widely used in learning environments to describe the supportive conduct.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60, 168–175.
Barron, B. (2006). Video as a tool to advance understanding of learning and development in peer, family and other informal learning contexts. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 159–187). Routledge: Abingdon.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393–451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carr, A., & Pike, A. (2012). Maternal scaffolding behaviour: Links with parenting style and maternal education. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 543–551.
Dickerson, P., Stribling, P., & Rae, J. (2007). Tapping into interaction: How children with autistic spectrum disorders design and place tapping in relation to activities in progress. Gesture, 7, 271–303.
Ekström, A., Lindwall, O., & Säljö, R. (2009). Questions, instructions, and modes of listening in the joint production of guided action: A study of student-teacher collaboration in handicraft education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(5), 497–514.
Freeman, S., & Kasari, C. (2013). Parent-child interactions in autism: Characteristics of play. Autism, 17(2), 147–161.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse Society, 18(1), 53–73.
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–33). New York: Free Press.
Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86–100). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Kasari, C., Gulsrud, A. C., Wong, C., Kwon, S., & Locke, J. (2010). Randomized controlled caregiver mediated joint engagement intervention for toddlers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(9), 1045–1056.
Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1998). Social interaction skills for children with autism: A script-fading procedure for beginning readers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(2), 191–202.
Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 13, pp. 171–194). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A. (2012). Instruction-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35(1), 27–49.
MacDuff, G. S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.), Making a Difference: Behavioral Intervention for Autism (pp. 37–50). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Maynard, D. W. (2005). Social actions, gestalt coherence, and designations of disability: Lessons from and about autism. Social Problems, 5, 499–529.
Mondada, L. (2014). Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 131–161.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 152–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salonen, P., Lepola, J., & Vauras, M. (2007). Scaffolding interaction in parent-child dyads: Multimodal analysis of parental scaffolding with task and non-task oriented children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(1), 77–96.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.
Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344–364.
Stribling, P., & Rae, J. (2010). Interactional analysis of scaffolding in a mathematical task in ASD. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood insights from conversation analysis (pp. 185–208). New York: Wiley.
Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, M. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behaviour for children with autism. Behaviour Modification, 25, 678–724.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original manuscripts [ca. 1930–1934].)
Wood, D. J. (1980). Teaching the young child: Some relationships between social interaction, language, and thought. In D. R. Olsen (Ed.) The Social Foundations of Language and Thought (pp. 280–296). New York, NY: Norton.
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2014). ‘Put your fingers right in here’: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 163–183.
Recommended reading
• Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding and its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344–364.
• Tarplee, C., & Barrow, E. (1999). Delayed echoing as an interactional resource: A case study ofa 3-year-old child on the autistic spectrum. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13, 449–482.
Transcription codes
The notation scheme used in for these data was originally developed by Gail Jefferson. For further explanation of Jefferson’s transcription conventions, see Jefferson, G. (1984) Transcription notation. In Atkinson, J. & Heritage, J. (Eds.) Structures of Social Action (pp. ix–xvi). New York: Cambridge University Press. Superscribed letters, as in Mary’s rendering of ‘help’, shown as ‘help’, are used to show sounds that are partially present, for example which condition the pronunciation of other sounds in the word but are not fully expressed.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Monica Ramey and John Rae
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramey, M., Rae, J. (2015). Parents’ Resources for Facilitating the Activities of Children with Autism at Home. In: O’Reilly, M., Lester, J.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428318_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428318_25
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57695-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42831-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)