Advertisement

Curbing Corruption or Promoting Integrity? Probing the Hidden Conceptual Challenge

  • Paul M. Heywood
  • Jonathan Rose
Chapter
Part of the Political Corruption and Governance book series (PCG)

Abstract

It is now widely accepted, both by academics and by policymakers, that corruption among public officials seriously undermines the quality of governance. Corruption increases bureaucratic inefficiency, reduces tax returns, challenges political legitimacy, and — fundamentally — is unethical. Corruption — however defined — also represents a major cost: globally, potentially $1 trillion could be ‘lost’ to corruption each year, although estimations of the costs of corruption are inherently imprecise. Given such staggering potential losses, it is unsurprising that there has been a desire to understand and ultimately reduce corruption. That has led to much detailed work that focuses on measuring and evaluating corruption, which in turn has prompted the paying of ever more attention to the issue of precisely how corruption may best be combated. Development aid agendes and financial institutions, in particular, have increasingly insisted that corruption be curbed (Charron, 2011: 71); thus, corruption within development projects is sufficient grounds for the World Bank to suspend project loans indefinitely (see, for example, World Bank, 2010: 11). The ostensible goal is to reduce the rate of corruption to more or less zero. However, regardless of questions about the efficiency of a system that seeks to be completely non-corrupt (see Anechiarico and Jacobs, 1996), it is far from obvious that achieving zero corruption — were such a thing possible — would result in the expected gains in either efficiency or ethics.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Public Official American Political Science Review Political Corruption Transparency International 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnafors, M. (2013), ‘Quality of Government: Toward a More Complex Definition,’ American Political Science Review, 107(3): 433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhassan-Alolo, N. (2007), ‘Gender and Corruption: Testing the New Consensus,’ Public Administration and Development, 27: 227–237. doi:  10.1002/pad.455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alm, James (1988), ‘Compliance Costs and the Tax Avoidance-Tax Evasion Decision,’ Public Finance Quarterly, 16(1): 31–66.Google Scholar
  4. Amundsen, Inge (1999), Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues (Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute).Google Scholar
  5. Andersson, S. and Heywood, P.M. (2009), ‘The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International’s Approach to Measuring Corruption,’ Political Studies, 57(4): 746–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anechiarico, F. and Goldstock, R. (2007), ‘Monitoring Integrity and Performance: An Assessment of the Independent Private Sector Inspector General,’ Public Integrity, 9(2): 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anechiarico, F. and Jacobs, J. (1996), The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  8. Ansell, C. (2001), ‘Legitimacy: Political,’ in N.J. Smelser, J. Wright and P. B. Baltes (eds), International Encyclopaedia of Social & Behavioural Sciences (Oxford: Elsevier): 8 704–8 706.Google Scholar
  9. Baldry, J.C. (1984), ‘The Enforcement of Income Tax Laws: Efficiency Implications*,’ Economic Record, 60: 156–159. Doi: 10.1111 /j.1475–4932.1984.tb00848.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beber, B. and Scacco, A. (2012), ‘What the Numbers Say: A Digit Based Test for Election Fraud,’ Political Analysis, 20(2): 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bratsis, Peter (2003), ‘The Construction of Corruption,’ Social Text, 21(4): 9–33. Doi:10.1215/01642472–21–4_77–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooks, R.C. ([1910] 1970), ‘The Nature of Political Corruption,’ in A. Heidenheimer (ed.), Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis (London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.): 56–64.Google Scholar
  13. Buchan, B. and Hill, L. (2014), An Intellectual History of Political Corruption (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchanan, A. (2002), ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy,’ Ethics, 112(4): 689–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carman, C. (2010), ‘The Process is the Reality: Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Participatory Democracy,’ Political Studies, 58(4): 731–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cartier—Bresson, J. (1997), ‘Cormption Networks, Transaction Security and Illegal Social Exchange.’ Political Studies, 45(3): 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chander, P. and Wilde, L.L. (1998),’A General Characterization of Optimal Income Tax Enforcement,’ Review of Economic Studies, 65(1): 165–183. Doi: 10.1111/ 1467–937X.00040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Charron, N. (2011), ‘Exploring the Impact of Foreign Aid on Corruption: Has the “Anti-Corruption Movement” Been Effective?’ The Developing Economies, 49(1): 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cicero, M. (1913 [44BC]), De Officiis, translated by Walter Miller (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coady, C.A.J. (2008), Messy Morality: The Challenge of Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  21. Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) (2009), MPs’ Expenses and Allowances: Supporting Parliament Safeguarding the Taxpayer, Cm 7724 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  22. Dan-Cohen, M. (2001), ‘The Value of Ownership,’ Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(4): 404–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fox, R. and Korris, M. (2012). ‘A Fresh Start? The Orientation and Induction of New MPs at Westminster Following the 2010 General Election,’ Parliamentary Affairs, 65(3): 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Golden, M. and Picci, L. (2005), ‘Proposal for a New Measure of Corruption. Illustrated with Italian Data,’ Economics and Politics, 17(1): 37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heywood, P. and Krastev, I. (2006), ‘Political Scandals and Corruption,’ in P.M. Heywood, E. Jones, M. Rhodes and U. Sedelmeier (eds), Developments in European Politics (Basingstoke: Macmillan): 157–176.Google Scholar
  26. House of Commons (2009), The Green Book: A Guide to Members’ Allowances (London: House of Commons).Google Scholar
  27. Huberts, L., Lasthuizen, K. and Peeters, C. (2006), ‘Measuring Corruption: Exploring the Iceberg,’ in C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors and F. Galtung (eds), Measuring Corruption (London: Ashgate): 265–293.Google Scholar
  28. Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) (2013), Annual Review of the MPs’ Scheme of Business Costs and Expenses, HC 1032 (London: The Stationary Office).Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, S. (2013 [1755]), ‘Corruption,’ A Dictionary of the English Language: A Digital Edition of the 1755 Classic by Samuel Johnson, B. Besalke (ed.). Available at http://johnsonsdictionaryonline.com/?p=16540 (last modified: November 7, 2013).Google Scholar
  30. Kalinin, K. and Mebane, W. (2010), ‘Understanding Electoral Frauds Through Evolution of Russian Federalism: From “Bargaining Loyalty” to “Signaling Loyalty”,’ Paper prepared for the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, September 2–5.Google Scholar
  31. Kalnins, V. (2014), Anti-Corruption Policies Revisited: D3.2.8. Background paper on Latvia. Alina Mungiu-Pippidi (ed.). ANTICORP deliverable paper [Available online: http://anticorrp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Latvia-Background-Report_final.pdf].Google Scholar
  32. Kelso, A. (2009), ‘Parliament on its Knees: MPs’ Expenses and the Crisis of Transparency at Westminster,’ The Political Quarterly, 80(3): 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenny, M. (2009). ‘Taking the Temperature of the British Political Elite 4: Labour, Chronicle of a Defeat Foretold?’ Parliamentary Affairs, 62(4): 663–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirk, U., Harvey, A., and Montague, P. R. (2011), ‘Domain Expertise Insulates Against Judgment Bias by Monetary Favors through a Modulation of Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25): 10332–10336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Legg, T. (2010), ‘ACA Review,’ in House of Commons Members Estimate Committee (ed.), Review of Past ACA Repayments, HC348 (London: The Stationary Office Limited).Google Scholar
  36. Mackie, J. (1977), Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  37. Mathur, A. and Singh, K. (2013), ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Corruption and Democracy,’ Applied Economics, 45(8): 991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mungiu-Pippidi, A., Loncaric, M., Vaz Mundo, B., Sponza Braga, A., Weinhardt, M., Solares, A., Skardziute, A., Martini, M., Agbele, F., Jensen, M., von Soest, C., and Gabedava, M.(2011), Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation).Google Scholar
  39. National Audit Office (NAO) (2011), IndependentParliamentary Standards Authority: The Payment of MPs’ Expenses, HC 1273 (London: The Stationary Office).Google Scholar
  40. Lord Nolan (1995), Standards in PublicLi fe: First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Cmnd. 2850–51 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  41. Nye, J.S. (1967), ‘Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis,’ The American Political Science Review, 51(2): 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Persson, A., Rothstein, B. and Teorell, J. (2012), ‘Why Anti-Corruption Efforts Fail: Systematic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem,’ Governance, 26(3): 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Philp, M. (2006), ‘Corruption Definition and Measurement,’ in C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors and E Galtung (eds), Measuring Corruption (London: Ashgate): 45–79.Google Scholar
  44. Philp, M. (2007), Political Conduct (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  45. Pope, J. (ed.) (1996), Nationallntegrity Systems: The TI Sourcebook (Berlin: Transparency International).Google Scholar
  46. Public Accounts Committee (2011), Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, HC 1426 (London: The Stationary Office Limited).Google Scholar
  47. Rose, J. (2014), The Public Understanding of Political Integrity: The Case for Probity Perceptions (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rose, J. and Heywood, P.M. (2013), ‘Political Science Approaches to Integrity and Corruption,’ Human Affairs, 23(2): 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rothstein, B. (2011), The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective (London: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sampford, C., Smith, R., and Brown, A. J. (2005), ‘From Greek Temple to Bird’s Nest: Towards a Theory of Coherence and Mutual Accountability for National Integrity Systems,’ Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(2): 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott, I. and Leung, J.Y. (2012). ‘Integrity Management in Post-1997 Hong Kong: Challenges for a Rule-Based System,’Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(1): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  53. Transparency International (TI) (2011), What is the Corruption Perceptions Index. Available at http://www.transparency.org/cpi2011/in_detail/#myAnchor3Google Scholar
  54. Tyler, T. (1994), ‘Governing Amid Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decisionmaking Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government,’ Law & Society Review, 28(4): 809–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tyler, T. (2000), ‘Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure,’ International Journal of Psychology, 35(2): 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vian, T. (2008), ‘Review of Corruption in the Health Sector: Theory, Methods and Interventions,’ Health Policy and Planning, 23(2): 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. World Bank (1996), Annual Meetings Address by James D Wolfensohn, October 1, 1996. Available at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ ORGANIZATION/EXTPRESIDENT/EXTPASTPRESIDENTS/PRESIDENTEXTERNAL/0„contentMDK:20025269-menuPK:232083-pagePK:159837-piPK:159808-theSit ePK:227585,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  58. World Bank (2010), Standard Conditions for Loans Made by the World Bank out of the Climate Investment Funds. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ INTLAWJUSTICE/Resources/STDCIF-English-10.pdfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul M. Heywood and Jonathan Rose 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul M. Heywood
  • Jonathan Rose

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations