Advertisement

Organizational Integrity and Human Maliciousness

  • Wim Dubbink
Chapter
  • 216 Downloads
Part of the Political Corruption and Governance book series (PCG)

Abstract

Recent decades have seen many instances of moral misconduct of organizations. Enron (fraud, corruption, greed, in 2007), Siemens (bribery in, 2006) and BP (negligence and environmental damage, in 2010) are just three world famous examples out of a long list. I define moral misconduct of organizations as something that happens when actions that — sociologically speaking — there is reason to attribute to an organization have consequences that constitute an infringement of the legal or moral rights of those outside the organization. The high number of incidents of organizational misconduct has led to an intensified interest in (explicit) ethics program within organizations.

Keywords

Compliance Strategy Organizational Integrity Integrity Strategy Rational Creature Immoral Conduct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson-Gold, S. and Muchnik, P. (eds) (2010), Kant’s Anatomy of Evil (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A., Caprara, G.-V. and Zsolnai, L. (2000), ‘Corporate Transgressions through Moral Disengagement,’ Journal of Human Values, VI/1: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, M. (1988), ‘What is Wrong with Self-Deception?’ in B.P. McLaughhlin and A. Oksenberg Rorty (eds), Perspectives on Self-Deception (Berkeley: University of California Press): 431–449.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, W. (1983), ‘Kants Pragmatische Anthopologie,’ in I. Kant (W. Becker (ed.)), Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (Stuttgart: Reclam): 9–26.Google Scholar
  5. Bowie, N. (2013), Business Ethics in the Early 21st Century (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, M.T. (2005), Corporate Integrity. Rethinking Organizational Ethics and Leadership (Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubbink, W. and Smith, J. (2011), ‘A Political Account of the Corporation as a Morally Responsible Actor,’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, XIV/2: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. French, P.A. (1992), Responsibility Matters (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas).Google Scholar
  9. Goodpaster, K. (2007), Conscience and Corporate Culture (Malden: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  10. Grenberg, J. (2005), Kant and the Ethics of Humility. A Story of Dependence, Corruption and Virtue (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harbers, H. (2005), Inside the Politics of Technology. Agency and Normativity in the Co-production of Technology and Society (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartley, R.F. (2005), Business Ethics. Mistakes and Successes (Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons).Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. (1788/1913), Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Kant’s Schriften Band V (Berlin: W. De Gruyter).Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1793/1914), Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blo/den Vernunft. Kant’s Schriften Band VI (Berlin: W. De Gruyter).Google Scholar
  15. Kant, I. (1797/1914), Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Kant’s Schriften Band VI (Berlin: W. De Gruyter).Google Scholar
  16. Kant, I. (1798/1917), Anthropologie im pragmatischer Hinsicht. Kant’s Schriften Band VII (Berlin: W. De Gruyter).Google Scholar
  17. Lamme, V. (2010), De vrije wil bestaat niet. Over wie er echt de baas is in het brein (Amsterdam: Bert Bakker).Google Scholar
  18. Loose, D. (2013), ‘Kants Architectuur van de Vrijheid,’ in Oomen, P. (ed.), Vrije Wil een Hersenkronkel? Wetenschappers en filosofen over een fascinerende vraag (Zoetermeer: Klement): 173–194.Google Scholar
  19. Maclntyre, A. (1987), After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
  20. Muchnik, P. (2010), ‘An Alternative Proof of the Universal Propensity to Evil,’ in S. Anderson-Gold and P. Muchnik (eds), Kant’s Anatomy of Evil (New York: Cambridge University Press): 116–143.Google Scholar
  21. Painter-Morland, M. (2011), Business Ethics as Practice. Ethics as Everyday Business ofBusiness (Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Pettit, P. (2001), A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  23. Selznick, P. (1992), The Moral Commonwealth. Social Theory and the Promise of Community (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  24. Seneca (and Janssen, T.H. (ed.)) (2006), Dialogen (Amsterdam: Boom).Google Scholar
  25. Sharp Paine, L. (1994), ‘Managing for Organizational Integrity,’ Harvard Business Review, March—April: 106–117.Google Scholar
  26. Sharp Paine, L. (1997), Cases in Leadership, Ethics and Organizational Integrity (Chicago: Irwin).Google Scholar
  27. Sticker, M. (2012), ‘Rationalizing as Self-Deception,’ Working Paper.Google Scholar
  28. Thielemann, U. (2005), ‘Compliance and Integrity — Zwei Seiten ethisch integrierter Unternehmenssteuerung,’ ZFWU, VI/1: 31–45.Google Scholar
  29. Trevino, L.K. and Nelson, K.A. (2007), Managing Business Ethics. Straight Talk about How to Do It Right, 4th edn (Hoboken: John Wiley).Google Scholar
  30. Vardi, Y. and Weitz, E. (2004), Misbehavior in Organizations. Theory, Research, and Management (London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates).Google Scholar
  31. Waters, J.A. (1978), ‘Catch 20.5: Corporate Morality as an Organizational Phenomenon,’ Organizational Dynamics, VII/1: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walzer, M. (1983), Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wim Dubbink 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wim Dubbink

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations